The piss match between Canucks and Avs fans will always be funny to me considering we’re not even rivals and this was the first ever trade between both teams.
I agree with everything you said. I'm not trying to dump on him and I have been very consistent saying that he would likely play NHL games for VAN or someone who needed an NHL D due to injuries would give VAN a late pick for him.While this is largely true, i think it's still worth mentioning that they don't really need it to scale. It's a nice surprise, just to have Brannstrom looking competent and bringing a little bit of puck movement to the bottom-pairing of a team that badly needs more of that element than their other Bottom-4 defencemen bring to the table.
Like...nobody is expecting it to scale to high leverage Top-4 minutes. But the reality is, he has been solid in the curated bottom-pairing minutes they've asked him to play. Which is fine value and a pleasant surprise on what was largely seen as a "contract dump" in this Poolman deal. Getting an actually playable NHLer even in protected minutes, is just a pure bonus.
I think that's a little overstated. The makeup of Vancouver's blueline is set pairs and is top heavy. It's not so much about managing this one player as it is maximizing ice time for Hughes-Hronek.Everything is relative. It's an objective truth that he is playing highly curated and managed minutes relative to your average bottom pairing defenseman. 14 minutes a night is nowhere near average bottom pairing minutes, let alone with the kind of hand picked deployment and competition he has faced.
The last time the two teams could have been considered good enough at the same time for it to matter was a decade ago in like 2003.The piss match between Canucks and Avs fans will always be funny to me considering we’re not even rivals and this was the first ever trade between both teams.
it started with Makar vs Hughes vs Fox in their rookie year. Who knew back then those three will likely define a whole generation of defensmen? Some posters didnt let go since. AVs are my backup team, since Sakic and Forsberg's first cup. I hope we will have a solid rivalry again.The piss match between Canucks and Avs fans will always be funny to me considering we’re not even rivals and this was the first ever trade between both teams.
The last time the two teams could have been considered good enough at the same time for it to matter was a decade ago in like 2003.
He played 150 games over the last 2 years, 16:00 toi, so your basic full time bottom pairing d-man. Though it was for Ottawa so maybe that doesn't count fully.I agree with everything you said. I'm not trying to dump on him and I have been very consistent saying that he would likely play NHL games for VAN or someone who needed an NHL D due to injuries would give VAN a late pick for him.
Point of contention was people conflating fringe or depth NHL D play with a legitimate bottom pair guy like a true #5.
11 pages on a D man playing 5/6 minutes or just over 13 minutes a game
When has LTIRetired players ever taken a 1st or 2nd to move? A mid/late pick has been the going rate since... well forever.
This is such a minor deal, it's weird people calling a winner. It's a step up from AHLers getting swapped.
Wait, are you talking specifically about the season where :Remember when Avs fans started a thread saying Toews was a better than Hughes based on a small sample in the middle of his first season with the Avs?
2020-21 | Vancouver Canucks | NHL | 56 | 3 | 38 | 41 | 22 | -24 |
2020-21 | Colorado Avalanche | NHL | 53 | 9 | 22 | 31 | 16 | 29 |
Wait, are you talking specifically about the season where :
Quinn Hughes
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]2020-21[/TD]
[TD]Vancouver Canucks[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]56[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]-24[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Devon Toews
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]2020-21[/TD]
[TD]Colorado Avalanche[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
That -24 eyesore doesn't exactly inspire a ton of confidence in what you're trying to say. Besides, it was probably a select few Avs fans who enjoy taking part in these types of discussions.
We all now realize that Q.Hughes is generational and Makar only wishes he had his skill set.
Wait, are you talking specifically about the season where :
Quinn Hughes
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]2020-21[/TD]
[TD]Vancouver Canucks[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]56[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]-24[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Devon Toews
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]2020-21[/TD]
[TD]Colorado Avalanche[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
That -24 eyesore doesn't exactly inspire a ton of confidence in what you're trying to say. Besides, it was probably a select few Avs fans who enjoy taking part in these types of discussions.
We all now realize that Q.Hughes is generational and Makar only wishes he had his skill set.
Who hurt you?Oh you mean when the Avs were a powerhouse and the Canucks were one of the worst in the league? When Toews got to play with one of the best (if not the best) dmen in the league, while QH got the amazing Luke Schenn?
I mean sure if you completely ignore context.............
How about just realizing that he isn't Tyson Barrie 2.0 (which quite a few in the avs fanbase kept saying) or that you don't need to comment on any message board or social media every time QH name is mentioned, just because a few overzealous Canucks fans had the "gall" to compare the immortal Cale Makar to Quinn Hughes? How about that?
11 pages on a D man playing 5/6 minutes or just over 13 minutes a game
The New Jersey devilsWho hurt you?
A cop-out is probably preferable rather than the endless, pointless player comparisons that people seem to enjoy.