Notabaguette
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2018
- 575
- 238
Nope. Tofolli’s value isn’t close to this.Lapierre for Toffoli?
Zachary Bolduc (Saint-Louis Blues)
Zachary L'Heureux (Nashville Predators)
Jakob Pelletier (Calgary Flames)
Samuel Poulin (Pittsburgh Penguins)
Hendrix Lapierre (Wahingston Capitals)
Xavier Bourgault (Edmonton Oilers)
Wondering if those players are available at all on the market for Montreal and if so, what would be the ask.
I'm not trying to low-ball these teams since I know they are all highly valuable assets.
Would be open to move some recent mid-late first as well (Poehling, Caufield) as well as retain on players like Petry, Gallagher, Price even if it's not likely to happens. But the deal would preferably be vets for youth, since Montreal are trending towards a rebuild. Semi-vets could be available too (Toffoli, Dvorak, Lekhonen, Hoffman, Drouin, Allen) and can be packaged. Retention on these players is another option.
Only untouchable I guess would be Suzuki on the team and the 1st 2022 or 2023 unprotected, unless the player listed above are part of a package. I know these are probably the assets that interest other teams the most (maybe the only one actually), but I think it's fair to say that they have more value 1 vs 1 than the 6 player mentioned.
Trying to get an idea on how teams value those skaters. I welcome offer for other NON-FRENCH CANADIANS prospect as well (late first/early second or decent project preferably), just feel the new direction might want to add some local talent to its prospect pool.
I've got news for you. Every GM has non-hockey-related biases that affect who they draft/acquire.
Does Montreal place a higher importance than every other team on local talent? Yes
Is it more important to Montreal fans to have local talent than the rest of the league? Yes
Does every other team also occasionally make decisions based on local player biases? Yes.
Does Montreal make decisions solely based on local talent completely ignoring scouting? No.
Except, "best player available" is far from an exact science. With any selection there is a large margin of error, and within that space it pays off to pick players with some kind of x-factor, and that can be a range of things from their personality type, reputation, and yes, where they are from.
It's not just the Habs either. As an Oiler fan, I see a lot of players picked because they are from the area.
Also, in this thread no one is talking about the top of the draft. We are talking later picks with a lot of uncertainty around them.
I dont know if French canadian players have any sort of record of hitting their potential. I bet it's worth noting. For some locals it might be a detriment but I would bet that it is often a very positive element that gives a player an extra push. It also makes them feel a little bit more comfortable and closer to home. Its definitely worth giving consideration to because these are humans and not their stats.
Never understood the need to go get these local guys. Last one cost us Sergachev
I would say it goes way beyond just hockey.Why is it always so accepted that's its OK for Montreal to want certain players and management based on race/culture? Seems very backwards in todays world.
Romanov for Lapierre?Zachary Bolduc (Saint-Louis Blues)
Zachary L'Heureux (Nashville Predators)
Jakob Pelletier (Calgary Flames)
Samuel Poulin (Pittsburgh Penguins)
Hendrix Lapierre (Wahingston Capitals)
Xavier Bourgault (Edmonton Oilers)
Wondering if those players are available at all on the market for Montreal and if so, what would be the ask.
I'm not trying to low-ball these teams since I know they are all highly valuable assets.
Would be open to move some recent mid-late first as well (Poehling, Caufield) as well as retain on players like Petry, Gallagher, Price even if it's not likely to happens. But the deal would preferably be vets for youth, since Montreal are trending towards a rebuild. Semi-vets could be available too (Toffoli, Dvorak, Lekhonen, Hoffman, Drouin, Allen) and can be packaged. Retention on these players is another option.
Only untouchable I guess would be Suzuki on the team and the 1st 2022 or 2023 unprotected, unless the player listed above are part of a package. I know these are probably the assets that interest other teams the most (maybe the only one actually), but I think it's fair to say that they have more value 1 vs 1 than the 6 player mentioned.
Trying to get an idea on how teams value those skaters. I welcome offer for other NON-FRENCH CANADIANS prospect as well (late first/early second or decent project preferably), just feel the new direction might want to add some local talent to its prospect pool.