Useless Thread MDCLXXXV: 2016 Is Almost Over

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,274
17,318
Hey look I'm half-cut and beasting a Codemasters racing game

Standard
 

Siamese Dream

Registered User
Feb 5, 2011
75,209
1,244
United Britain of Great Kingdom
"eh, whatever you want"

There was a hilarious generation gap in court a month or so ago when the middle-aged advocate was trying to explain a UB40 reference to the Magistrates (who are all ancient) and of course I had no clue what she was on about either.

It was something to do with the defendant not being allowed to contact his ex and they were fans of UB40 and he had commented on a Facebook feed in which her name was tagged so she could see it, and he had referenced the "Rat In My Kitchen" song in reference to her being a rat for grassing him up to the police and that he was going to kill her, like a lyric in the song apparently. The Advocate was trying to explain to the Magistrates that it was a joke.
 

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,274
17,318
There was a hilarious generation gap in court a month or so ago when the middle-aged advocate was trying to explain a UB40 reference to the Magistrates (who are all ancient) and of course I had no clue what she was on about either.

It was something to do with the defendant not being allowed to contact his ex and they were fans of UB40 and he had commented on a Facebook feed in which her name was tagged so she could see it, and he had referenced the "Rat In My Kitchen" song in reference to her being a rat for grassing him up to the police and that he was going to kill her

are you sure you work in a court and not on the Jeremy Kyle show
 

Siamese Dream

Registered User
Feb 5, 2011
75,209
1,244
United Britain of Great Kingdom
are you sure you work in a court and not on the Jeremy Kyle show

I'm not sure sometimes. The family court is always the best, they are in court against their ex partner and they always bring their new partner with them as a "McKenzie friend" to stir up the pot even more.

Actually the best ones are when the police come to do a Domestic Violence Prevention Order against someone and the bloke turns up accompanied by the woman they want to prevent him from seeing, and she opposes the police doing it
 

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,274
17,318
I'm not sure sometimes. The family court is always the best, they are in court against their ex partner and they always bring their new partner with them as a "McKenzie friend" to stir up the pot even more.

9457719.jpeg

?
 

Siamese Dream

Registered User
Feb 5, 2011
75,209
1,244
United Britain of Great Kingdom

A McKenzie friend assists a litigant in person in a court of law in England and Wales. This person does not need to be legally qualified. The crucial point is that litigants in person are entitled to have assistance, lay or professional, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

Their role was set out most clearly in the eponymous 1970 case McKenzie v McKenzie.[1] Although in many cases a McKenzie friend may be an actual friend, it is often somebody with knowledge of the area, and the trend is heavily in favour of admitting McKenzie friends.[2] He or she may be liable for any misleading advice given to the litigant in person[citation needed] but is not covered by professional indemnity insurance.
 

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,274
17,318
A McKenzie friend assists a litigant in person in a court of law in England and Wales. This person does not need to be legally qualified. The crucial point is that litigants in person are entitled to have assistance, lay or professional, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

Their role was set out most clearly in the eponymous 1970 case McKenzie v McKenzie.[1] Although in many cases a McKenzie friend may be an actual friend, it is often somebody with knowledge of the area, and the trend is heavily in favour of admitting McKenzie friends.[2] He or she may be liable for any misleading advice given to the litigant in person[citation needed] but is not covered by professional indemnity insurance.

I can see no possible downsides to this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad