John Price
Gang Gang
- Sep 19, 2008
- 384,994
- 30,519
I do have a naver account and have had for over a year and a halfof course not, you don't even have naver tv
i installed the app a few days agoI do have a naver account and have had for over a year and a half
There's a bunch of restricted stuff on naverdid you have anny region restrictions?
I was trying to watch pga golf on naver and it was region blocked
2k announced it like two weeks agohe tweeted this today
do you have 2k
nice is it any fun2k announced it like two weeks ago
Do have it
in this discussion people are saying BF1 was good @Sega Dreamcast
Again going to insist 1 was alright and 5 was okay
they were not disasters but they didn't have the appeal of 4. Maybe it was the historical theme and the guns of the era. 4's guns blow 1 and 5 away
you use to be able to run over people with horses or hit them with a sword and kill themI guess an apt description of the difference between BF4 and BF1 is the same way people compare the first and second seasons of The Wire.
BF1 isn't bad, but it's too different from BF4 for my tastes.
I would be that medic in the underground train map who would stand near one of the main stairways and just revive people over and over and over@Sega Dreamcast @Oogie Boogie reminisce with me about the old days of BF
I have never played MOHAA but it was regarded as widely popular in FPS circles back in the dayDidn't EA also make (more like acquire) the Medal of Honor series?
They already had WW1 games, so trying to differentiate themselves from the futuristic theme of Call of Duty was pretty pointless.
Imagine if they had just remade Battlefield Vietnam or Battlefield 2142. Easy money
they put a limit to how many times you can revive in 4 (someone could be revived 20 rev, die, and there's no option to revive him, meanwhile in 2 you could revive him repeatedly)I would be that medic in the underground train map who would stand near one of the main stairways and just revive people over and over and over