Useless Thread MDCCXCV: O N E M I L L I O N

Status
Not open for further replies.

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,045
30,537
You're accessing the website in an unsanctioned manner by using an adblocker, therefore using an adblocker to view copyrighted material is theft.
lol wat

you're crazy lol

you're saying accessing an article that is free to access for everyone, without a paywall, is theft

:laugh:
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,045
30,537
Finally, I'm the one shitposting and getting you all riled up
gfEKVUnwQE8uYNHEVySlpxJj-An7W_u-56eJ1Qhj754.gif
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,045
30,537
boys the AOTY hype for Lilac is off the charts it's ranking super high on Melon and other korean analytics sites

dY0-lmPjkNO7nflT3Y9v3192TN4VLMKhaggmLvpv3lo.gif
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,045
30,537
that being said if you want to bitch about legal and non legal there is literally no legal way for me to watch the Washington Nationals. :laugh:

- Legal

Get a f***ing cable sub

- Illegal (most people)

- VPN

- third party streaming site

Which is why I just listen on radio
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,045
30,537
It's immoral in that the website doesn't make money showing stupid ads

but it is also legal

that is like saying skipping commercials is illegal. The advertiser can show us ads. I can just fast forward.
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,045
30,537
Skipping commercials is perfectly legal. Nobody pays attention tot hat shit. They put a movie on cable and you record and skip commercials*

*except in the case of VoD where I was subjected to at least 6 3 minute ad breaks during The Great Gatsby On Demand video last night

Seriously they don't let you fast forward lol

it's fine






Every one of them has the same stupid drug ad though. SMOKING HURTS YOUR LUNGS. IF YOU SMOKE YOU HURT THE PEOPLE YOU LOVE. lolwat

SMOKING CONTAINS HARMFUL CHEMICALS

yeah we know
 

Sega Dreamcast

party like it's 1999
May 6, 2009
47,666
7,304
Charlotte
It’s not ad-blocking that’s illegal.

It’s the circumvention of ‘technological measures’ that is.

Ad blockers don’t just block ads.

Most current-generation ad blockers have an additional layer of technology that goes around technological defenses of ad-block-detection scripts used by publishers.

And that’s where the rub is.
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,045
30,537
It’s not ad-blocking that’s illegal.

It’s the circumvention of ‘technological measures’ that is.

Ad blockers don’t just block ads.

Most current-generation ad blockers have an additional layer of technology that goes around technological defenses of ad-block-detection scripts used by publishers.

And that’s where the rub is.
bullshit
 

Sega Dreamcast

party like it's 1999
May 6, 2009
47,666
7,304
Charlotte

Are ad blocker programs illegal for you to use?

The whole article actually makes sense of it.

If a publisher uses access-control technologies, such as BlockAdblock, to prevent users—or restrict browsers equipped with ad-blocking plug-in—from accessing or selectively downloading their site’s copyrighted content without the accompanying advertising, that “defense” should be left alone to be implemented.

It's not illegal to block ads, but it is illegal to bypass a system that grants access to copyrighted material.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad