MrCreamm
Registered User
- Nov 16, 2023
- 89
- 200
I mean within the future, I'm not denying they've won something.If I remember correctly, the USA won a best on best in the mid 90’s.
I mean within the future, I'm not denying they've won something.If I remember correctly, the USA won a best on best in the mid 90’s.
Im fine. Just curious what you base it on.
What makes Barkov, Hintz, Lundell and Aho better than Bratt, Nylander, Forsberg and Raymond?
Rantanen and Heiskanen is better than any Swede, that i admit.
How is Lindell better than Dahlin, Ekholm, Brodin, Hedman, Rasmus Andersson and Forsling?
Taking in consideration the expensive prices for kids to play hockey today, how hockey is losing tradition in Quebec (The Meca of Hockey), and how hockey is growing in the United States, do you think that in the next 20 years, the USA national team will became the biggest potence in the international hockey world?
For this to happen, hockey simply needs to gain much more popularity in the USA. More viewers = bigger salaries.Don Cherry predicted as much.
This was before the ‘96 tournament. And he emphasized the lack of sustainable structure on rising costs, but also noting that the then building American youth system was placing greater emphasis on sound youth hockey education and resources.
Programmatically, he’s right.
Like everything that was once identifiably Canadian, cost and culture have become too expensive.
Doesn’t mean we won’t produce players in the future. I just think the Americans will produce more and as a consequence of greater yield, shift leadership accordingly.
Demographics in a multiplicative of applications aren’t in Canada’s favor here.
Don Cherry predicted as much.
make it make sense people![]()
ye ik its a minority, kinda got carried away but point still standsNot everyone from the same country has the same opinion. And it's an extreme minority position that the USA's recent history is stronger than Canada's.
You're conflating a few people with the consensus opinion.
Happy to help it make sense for you.
Since 2001, USA Swimming membership has increased by 25%, and more of those athletes are sticking with the sport (70% in 2010 compared to 65% in 2001). Clearly not all of that interest can be directly attributed to Phelps, but after Beijing, the organization saw its highest increase in year-round memberships in 23 years. At the last swim of his career in London, fans poured into the Aquatic Center from around the globe.You don’t get to just make up stupid fake facts and then demand facts to prove you wrong. You made a bs claim. You got called out and you couldn’t back it up. Own it.
More wealth in the US.People ask this all the time like it's not just as expensive in the US.
You say more wealth, I say more income disparity. Just because you can pay for it doesn't mean the kid is skilled enough. Hockey is an expensive sport but rich families aren't exactly the ones who comprise the elite athlete tier.More wealth in the US.
Also the defence and goalies of Canada are falling off. The US is pumping out elite goalies one after another.
And a lot of Canadian players are still developed in Canada in Canadian leagues paid for in Canadian dollars. Just because the US is richer doesn't mean they produce top talents everywhere, even in the other Big 5 sports it's Europeans and Latin Americans and other persons of other cultural backgrounds dominating the new generation.Yes, but the US is a much richer country than Canada.
Taking in consideration the expensive prices for kids to play hockey today, how hockey is losing tradition in Quebec (The Meca of Hockey), and how hockey is growing in the United States, do you think that in the next 20 years, the USA national team will became the biggest potence in the international hockey world?
Montreal is the Mecca of hockey.United states has like 10x the population of Canada. It is only a matter of time if the sport grows enough due to sheer numbers they overtake Canada in players. Canada will continue to produce superstars though.
As for your Meca comment / bait, let me know when Quebec is turning out superstar after superstar like Ontario is. Who was the last great Quebec superstar?
Don Cherry predicted as much.
This was before the ‘96 tournament. And he emphasized the lack of sustainable structure on rising costs, but also noting that the then building American youth system was placing greater emphasis on sound youth hockey education and resources.
Programmatically, he’s right.
Like everything that was once identifiably Canadian, cost and culture have become too expensive.
Doesn’t mean we won’t produce players in the future. I just think the Americans will produce more and as a consequence of greater yield, shift leadership accordingly.
Demographics in a multiplicative of applications aren’t in Canada’s favor here.
That didn’t support your made up point. USA has always been the best at swimming so the premise doesn’t make sense. It’s not as if Phelps was the first great American swimmer. Your point is garbage. American hockey fans care a lot more about their nhl teams. Not what country a particular player is from. Who do you think is more popular in Washington DC - Auston Matthews or Alex Ovechkin?Since 2001, USA Swimming membership has increased by 25%, and more of those athletes are sticking with the sport (70% in 2010 compared to 65% in 2001). Clearly not all of that interest can be directly attributed to Phelps, but after Beijing, the organization saw its highest increase in year-round memberships in 23 years. At the last swim of his career in London, fans poured into the Aquatic Center from around the globe.
![]()
Out of the Olympic Pool, Can Michael Phelps Still Grow Swimming? | TIME.com
He's sworn off swimming competitively (for now). But that doesn't mean he won't be the world's best ambassador for the sportolympics.time.com
There's one.
Lets see you provide a single source outside of talking out your ass.
And in those 30 years it could be argued that Canada increased its gap over the USA. Canada has multiple wins in best in best since that last American win. Other Euro countries have wins. While the USA has none. The USA produces a lot of good players but lacks the elite players other countries have. Other than Patrick Kane was there an elite difference maker from the US since the 90’s? Yet during that time Canada and several European nations have produced a lot.Don Cherry predicted as much.
This was before the ‘96 tournament. And he emphasized the lack of sustainable structure on rising costs, but also noting that the then building American youth system was placing greater emphasis on sound youth hockey education and resources.
Programmatically, he’s right.
Like everything that was once identifiably Canadian, cost and culture have become too expensive.
Doesn’t mean we won’t produce players in the future. I just think the Americans will produce more and as a consequence of greater yield, shift leadership accordingly.
Demographics in a multiplicative of applications aren’t in Canada’s favor here.
In 2019/20, the 2001/2005 generation, Canadiens also seemed superior with Lafreniere, Byfield, Drysdale, Power, Clarke, Wright, Fantilli, Bedard. Everyone has become less strong than expected and USA has the advantage over these generations while in the draft they were behind (J.Hughes, Boldy, Sanderson, Faber, Knies, L.Hughes, Cooley, Hutson).Well, if you look at the best rosters they can ice these days, they are pretty much equal so i would say it has been not just talking but also actions so far. But then on the other hand, drafts previous years and in the coming years have been dominated by Canada when it comes to top talent, i am not sure if its is going to stay as equal as it is right now.
Bedard, Fantilli, Celebrini, Schaefer, McKenna, Dupont. Pretty dominant 5-year run
Montreal is the Mecca of hockey.
History + Passion + 24 Cups make Montreal the Mecca of hockey. And it’s not just me who makes that allusion.Saying it doesn't make it true. It's all good