For this roster? I'd take Perron without thinking twice.
Chippy veteran who's great down low and on the cycle, has Stanley Cup pedigree and can still contribute 40-50 points in a secondary role while providing stability and leadership in the room for an immature and inexperienced core that badly needs it.
And as someone else said, Amadio is the Joseph replacement, much moreso than Perron.
The crux of it, though, is that this roster was very poorly contructed. And the results speak for themselves.
But after the last couple of weeks, we have much more balance and flexibility to move forward.
Even if, when looked at in a vacuum, some of the trades may not have returned as much "value" as fans wanted.
Joseph actually outscored Perron at even strength last year. Only reason Perron had more points last year is because he played almost 3 minutes a game on the top PP unit of Detroit, while Joseph only played 54 seconds a game on the second unit.
He won't get that here with Stutzle, Tkachuk, Norris, Batherson and Giroux in our top 6. Might push Greig out of the top 6, which I don't love and put up 40-50P because of it, but that doesn't mean he'll be more valuable than Joseph all-around.
Not sure why people are so hyperfocused on who Joseph's replacement is. We had room for a top 9 forward and we signed two. Could have just signed Amadio and rolled out an excellent shutdown line of Joseph-Pinto-Amadio, not to mention keeping the 3rd and having an extra 1M in cap space to help extend Pinto and maybe add some depth.
He lost his spot to Brossoit and then Hill. He was seen as their third string goalie. There is a reason he went for two third round picks.
All of this is incorrect.
He was the starting goalie for the Knights in 22/23, got injured in the playoffs and then Brossoit/Hill took over.
Brossoit played on Winnipeg this past season and Thompson split starts with Hill. Just like in 22/23 he played the most games of any Vegas goalie at 46.