Okay. But that would make Guryanov ineligible for international competition in the event Russia returns to IIHF touraments.
My question is what rule will Guryanov break? I mean the player, not the club/league (
If). Guryanov is currently without a contract both in the NHL and in another European league.
The IIHF international transfer regulations knows the transfer to Non-Member Organization (NHL, KHL). They regulate the transfer from MNA (any European league) to Non-Member Organization & vice versa. But, does the IIHF transfer regulations say something about a
transfer from Non-Member Organization (NHL) to Non-Member Organization (KHL)? I doubt ... but you can prove me wrong. If the IIHF rules do not regulate such transfers (NHL to KHL), how can the IIHF sanction a player / club? All process happening outside IIHF jurisdiction. You said "NHL still voluntarily adheres to the IIHF Transfer Card process even though they're not required to."
The IIHF international transfer regulations, article 8.1, is very interesting. Quoting: "All MNAs, their leagues, and clubs must respect all existing and valid Contracts of Players playing in other MNAs or Non-Member Organizations. " Question:
must Non-Member Organizations (NHL, KHL) respect all existing and valid Contracts of Players playing in other MNAs? My understanding is that it is the point of the rule to make the NHL free to
not respect all valid contracts of players in Europe (MNA). Hence the need to sign the NHL Transfer Agreement. But it is not an obligation. So, even without NHL TA the European clubs would have to respect the NHL valid contracts, but the NHL would not need to respect the valid players contracts with European clubs. Yes, the rule is one-sided, giving the NHL an advantage. ... now the same applies to KHL if the IIHF will honor their rules.
All transfers from NHL to KHL & vice versa will very soon happen outside IIHF jurisdiction. The same applies to transfers from MHL (Russian major junior league) to NHL (not CHL/USHL).