GDT: United States Vs Germany | 2:30PM ET | Group A - Canadian Tire Centre

MTU34

Registered User
Oct 6, 2020
1,363
2,570
Only thing I can think of is it was delayed because he didn’t have possession
That’s 100% what it is. Asinine that pushing the puck 6 inches ahead of your stick is considered not having possession but here we are
 
  • Like
Reactions: SI90

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
18,908
12,973
Only thing I can think of is it was delayed because he didn’t have possession
It is determined form when he touched the puck in the zone. If it took that long to review it then there was no clear view of his toe on the ice. GHo with the call on the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SI90

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
43,172
9,317
That’s 100% what it is. Asinine that pushing the puck 6 inches ahead of your stick is considered not having possession but here we are

I don’t think the delayed offside rule uses the wording possession but rather touching the puck. I guess one could argue it’s not delayed so touching doesn’t matter.
 

jj cale

Registered User
Jan 5, 2016
16,721
10,117
Nova Scotia
Regardless of the call..................interesting to witness Augustines performance tonight, call never should have had to come come into effect anyway.

Put this one away in the files.
 

MTU34

Registered User
Oct 6, 2020
1,363
2,570
I don’t think the delayed offside rule uses the wording possession but rather touching the puck. I guess one could argue it’s not delayed so touching doesn’t matter.
Everything you’ve said about the scenario in this thread is 100% correct. I just hate the way the rule is written
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chainshot

Cloned

Begging for Bega
Aug 25, 2003
81,775
71,992
USA screwing themselves the last few min of play (and 0 for 3 PP), but that's the typical shit call against USA playing in CAN
Do you actually think Canada would want the US finishing lower in their group and potentially having to face them earlier in the elimination round?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad