Daneurism
Registered User
- Nov 13, 2010
- 1,086
- 307
Sutter is an absolute embarassment to Canadian hockey with those comments he made. We're unskilled, my buttocks.
I know this isn't a U17 debate, but seriously, how one coach can pick a roster, refuse to play 1/3 of said roster, and having that roster heavily slanted towards grinders with slow feet and then not taking any accountability for how that team played is a joke.
That clown better not step foot near these kids again, it's attitudes like his that have us where we are.
The Finns were not more skilled than the Swede's, Russian's, or Canadian's, they just played the best at the U20. If Canada took their most skilled players, maybe the coaches wouldn't have to worry about finding 4-5 minutes a night for Fred Gauthier and Kerby Rychel (who are good Pro prospects, but had no business making the U20 team).
Sorry for going way off-topic, but I'm embarassed as a Canadian, not so much at the performance of these KIDS, but the lack of accountability for that goof of a coach. In my eyes, we were outcoached every game. Every team gained our blueline with ease, and had the ability to support the puck all over the ice. Sutter's team couldn't find any space in the neutral zone, but all the other teams could against us...to me that is coaching.
end rant/
U17 was a good tourney, I really like the proposed changes. Taking 3 teams of the best players makes more sense for HC.
Here here
Really shameful of him to throw his team under the bus like that.