I have watched Toffoli play quite a bit. It seems to me that you have followed his development from an earlier age, so a couple questions. It seems to me, at least in the AHL, that Toffoli seems to disappear for long stretches of games. I am not sure if that is because of his style of play, meaning looking for holes in those scoring areas on the ice, or if it is because of a more, dare I say it, lazy style of play? How would you describe his game? Second, why was he passed over for the World Junior Team after two consecutive monster years in Junior Hockey. Is their something else to this? Anyway, just general observations, looking for your opinion on this.
There has been allot of speculation as to why TT was left of of team CA (you've probably heard most of them) but as far as the Kings, the 67's and myself personally believe (and TT as well if you ask him) it was all politics.
So, what does that mean in this case? It is said that TT was overlooked originally as a spat between two coaches that was very bitter and that was caused by an on the ice incident involving TT and a coaches son all the way back in Bantam. I don't have and way of verifying anything either way outside of asking people who either have an interest in TT's success or failure. It seems far fetched to me.
Back when this was being discussed there seemed to be allot of talk around the 67's about TT being overlooked due to a single scouting report by a biased individual that said that TT was too streaky and a poor skater. This seems more likely then any spat between coaches.
Other than that I honestly don't know why TT was left off of the roster. I do know that most everyone around knows that it was a mistake and the results show that things could have been different if TT had been on the team.
On the vanishing TT question I see it this way.
Some players see the game slightly differently then the rest. Sometimes this is a good thing and some times it isn't. When it works you see a player who always seems to find themselves in the best possible position to make the best play for their respective positions.
A goalie who seems to be in the perfect place every time but doesn't have a specific style. A Dman who has a prolific sense of when to step up etc etc.
TT is one of those guys who just looks to be in the perfect position to be where the puck is looking to end up so he can get a great shot off. So far it is working really well for him but, the reason that you and everyone else who watches him sees him as disappearing during stretches of a game (or games) is that he tends to only look for those types of opportunities instead of just continuing to work hard the rest of the time like most every other player.
It is a style of play that is unusual and so it appears that he isn't doing anything when he is actually looking for what he sees as doing the right thing. Will that translate to NHL success? There is the question. So far he has had coaches who see what he is doing and have adapted their expectations (and in Ottawa even their own coaching style at times) to accommodate TT's style of play because he is so successful.
DS isn't going to do that and so Morris and co have worked hard at developing the rest of TT's game to try and find balance between his own style and what is going to be expected of him on the Kings (and in the NHL).
They haven't had to work too hard and TT is having some huge success in the AHL but due to his style of play it can look like he is floating. That is just the way the kid plays. I think he will do really well in the NHL eventually but will be a bit of a streaky scorer. A good one but streaky.