Senovision
Registered User
- May 23, 2011
- 2,928
- 1,977
2 more right handed versions please.He's ready. He's exactly what they are missing. Enough AHL for him, maybe some of the other d will see his physicality and start to emulate it. His range and reach shut down the entire side of the ice. They need 2 more of him.
Yeah, of all the guys that could be around when we pick, that looks like a nice pick.Yakemchuk has the size & reach to be a similar player with much more offence to his game.
3 klevens and then we will be talking but how we have too much of one type of guy2 more right handed versions please.
Yeah, of all the guys that could be around when we pick, that looks like a nice pick.
Last year when he finished the season. But he was more poised this time. Its not fancy hockey but he plays winning hockey something this team needs in spades. Advanced stat guys arent going to think he's anything special so if you relly on that type of thing you probably wont love him. However the other team see's him and how there is no gap no space and a long reach they wont like it.Maybe by a micro step. But I’ve seen him play like that for us.
Is that was Vegas was saying when they hoisted the cup. Whitecloud, Hague, McNabe, Martinez. Its good to have physicaly defensive players. I dont see them complaining about it.3 klevens and then we will be talking but how we have too much of one type of guy
Courtesy of @2CHAINZ3 klevens and then we will be talking but how we have too much of one type of guy
They have to make changes on defence, it was terrible this yr along with goaltending. My guess is they buy out Hamonic & either let Brannstrom walk or try & trade him again. This defence is too weak, too small & too soft & Kleven brings all of those tangibles this defence lacks especially on the left side. They also need to make a decision whether to go another yr with Chabot & Chychrun or exchange one likely Chychrun for a legitimate #1 goalie (Ullmark) or a top 4 RD (Jones). It doesn't matter what happens with the rest of this yr, it will give him some experience, but next yr he needs to earn that spot & it's obvious he's close.I like Kleven a lot but didn't see a player who showed he's ready to make that next step to become a full time NHLer. That said it was one game and consistency is going to be a big factor. He needs time to get more comfortable but I'd like to see him play a little quicker. Chicago didn't manage to get much of a forecheck going but against teams like Carolina and Florida he could be in a lot of trouble. Winnipeg should be a good test.
Why do you think his advanced stats will be bad?Advanced stat guys arent going to think he's anything special so if you relly on that type of thing you probably wont love him.
But we have chabot/chychrun and sanderson and Brannstrom though3 klevens and then we will be talking but how we have too much of one type of guy
Sanderson and chabot are not the same guy.But we have chabot/chychrun and sanderson and Brannstrom though
Branny turned it over and didn’t take anyone in front. Klevin wasn’t blameless but….Was that 1st goal Klevens fault or brannys
I just don't think they're gonna be elite but he will be very effective. The parts of his game he excels at aren't typically measured that way.Why do you think his advanced stats will be bad?
No, but my point is just that we have the puck movers, we need shutdown type guys for the right side.Sanderson and chabot are not the same guy.
An experienced guy can be his partnerrather get someone with experience to play the bottom pair and have Kleven be a callup
Well, at some point decisions need to be made, and having a vet to play on the bottom pair may have to come at the expense of something else.rather get someone with experience to play the bottom pair and have Kleven be a callup
How many games does Hamonic have? Asking for a friend.An experienced guy can be his partner
Brannstrom. 25 in September. 265+ NHL games. 350+ professional games. A puck mover to Kleven's stay at home.Well, at some point decisions need to be made, and having a vet to play on the bottom pair may have to come at the expense of something else.
Some have suggested we need a middle six winger, a top four RHD, a bottom pair D, and a new starting goalie. If I had to sacrifice something, it starts with the vet bottom pair D.