Player Discussion Tyler Kleven (D) at 44th Overall (Sens traded up)

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,966
7,917
I agree that most D are left-handed, which is why RHD are more inherently valuable, which is why it's confusing why we don't prioritize it like other teams seem to do. Instead, we prefer to convert players to their off-side which often has mixed results. It makes it even more confusing when we are drafting nearly LHD at 2x the rate of RHD as well since 2013 where is has been by far our biggest need, along with consistent goaltending. You would think that in 10 years, we could get something decent, or at least better than Zub, who we got in FA.

Should have kept Dylan Demelo and Cosy Ceci.


Stupid asset management
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sens of Anarchy

RickyLafleur

Fall of Pierre
Oct 17, 2013
3,119
2,117
Ottawa, ON
The pick was McAvoy in 2016
He would look on the top pairing, that's for sure. Logan did have some red flags about him, which may have been skating or health-related. I remember him being one of the more "boom or bust types". Hard to say what my exact feelings were about him at the time as I can't quite remember.
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
67,224
52,970
He would look on the top pairing, that's for sure. Logan did have some red flags about him, I remember him being one of the more "boom or bust types". Hard to say what my exact feelings were about him at the time as I can't quite remember.
They traded up for Brown too. I remember sort of making fun of NJD fans at the time with their taking Michael McLeod. Everyone would want McLeod now. Funny how things work out... Brown certainly looked like he had all kinds of potential that never really took hold for several possible reasons.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,026
34,799
They traded up for Brown too. I remember sort of making fun of NJD fans at the time with their taking Michael McLeod. Everyone would want McLeod now. Funny how things work out... Brown certainly looked like he had all kinds of potential that never really took hold for several possible reasons.
Felt a bit like we were drafting for position, we wanted the next Spezza, and had apparently lost faith in Zibanejad, I loved the pick at the time, obviously in hindsight there were some guys that would have been preferable, ironically I wanted him or Chychrun that year. Kind of got both eventually...
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,734
10,622
Montreal, Canada
Hindsight is 20/20, but realistically they had 2 good drafts in the past 10 years. That's not a lot for a team that only made the playoffs twice since 2013 and prides itself on the draft and prospect development. No prospects from the last 3 drafts have played a single game yet.

There was no problem with this team outside of Melnyk before Dorion put his footprint. His first trade was Zibanejad + 2nd for Brassard and it all went downhill from there. Sure we weren't contenders before that but since making the finals in 2007 with a one line-team, we made the playoffs 6 times in the next 10 years with 3 rounds won and an ECF (not much credit to Dorion as it was Murray's team). The difference is we never got to rebuild after the team took a nosedive in 2008-09, yet Murray rebuilt it on the fly and we had at least some mitigated success. Remember we couldn't rebuild as long as Alfie was playing... So I don't see the problem before 2017-18, what we needed is making that 2016-17 even better but with Melnyk and Dorion, I think it was just not possible (plus Karlsson-Hoffman saga and tons of injuries, etc)

But looking at the last 10 drafts (so 2014 to 2023)

2014 : was seen as a weak draft, we traded our 1st and got Bobby Ryan who played 455 games for this team and scored 266 pts, which could have been better if he didn't ran into a bunch of injuries (plus personal problems). Sure it took years but Englund seems to be doing well for the Kings now. Is Ryan + Englund good vs that quality of draft? I don't know but not bad at all. I won't count it as a good draft since Ryan wasn't a pick

2015 : just getting Chabot at 18th OA is a homerun in itself. We also got White, Chlapik, Wolanin, Jaros and Daccord who were all pretty good prospects at some point and played in the NHL. Daccord seems to be establishing himself as a NHLer right now. Not sure what happened with White but he should be a bottom-6 forward, sure Dorion totally overpaid him and that kinda derailed his trajectory but surprising he's not in the NHL right now

2016 : first draft with Dorion as the GM, there was hope with Brown, Dahlen and Lajoie but not much out of that draft in the end

2017 : Formenton and Batherson, excellent. Sucks that Formenton is a possible a-hole but can't blame that on Dorion/Sens

2018 : Tkachuk was a 4th OA pick yes but that makes it an automatic great draft for the team. JBD, Crookshank and possibly Mandolese makes it an even better draft for Ottawa

2019 : Pinto in the 2nd was a homerun (if he starts playing lol), Sogaard another possible homerun. Kastelic and Guenette were good picks too, the quality of this draft haul remains to be seen but seems like a good draft for us. Thomson has talent, who knows if ever finds more self-confidence

2020 : one of the best draft hauls by a single team in NHL history

2021 : Ostapchuk might be the only hope, maybe Boucher ends up as an useful 4th liner. Awful draft so far but depending on these 2... it might change

2022 : Pettersson, Halliday and Donovan are good/decent prospects but the hopes are thin at the moment, for sure. Traded our 1st and 2nd for DeBrincat...

2023 : Andonovski looks promising, maybe some of the others will surprise but could easily be another bust draft. Traded our 1st for Chychrun too


2015, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 were good drafts. The last 3 are still huge question marks

Only 2014 and 2016 were bad and possibly the last 3 (way too early to know)
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,734
10,622
Montreal, Canada
I agree that Pinto and Grieg will likely be impact players for us, but the rest of that list is underwhelming, to say the least.
Unfortunately, Formenton will likely never play in the NHL again as he was really good on the 3rd line.
It is likely, that we won't get a single impact player (top 6 F/top 4 D) from the last 3 drafts. That would be disastrous for a contender, but it's even worse for a team that missed the playoffs each of those 3 years.

So it's not just Batherson like you initially claimed...

Formenton, Pinto, Greig... all would have been or will be good/great players.

As for the rest, I think you are drawing conclusions quite fast.

Bernard-Docker is just starting to play and is 23 y/o, IMO he will have a long career as an efficient defensive D-man, will not put the pts that will make him earn big money so a cheap reliable D-man. Not awesome for a late first but not bad at all.

Sogaard turned 23 y/o this month... still very young for a goalie, some break out in their late 20's. He's still progressing and has a lot of potential

Kastelic is a success 5th rounder, he's big, elite on face-offs and properly coached can be an effective 4th liner as long as he is physical and defend his teammates. He has a bit of a goal scoring touch too (early for Crookshank but he could be another success 5th round pick)

Guenette also look like a future very successful 7th round pick. I mean, most 7th rounders usually don't even sniff being as good as he has been in the AHL. He's only 22 y/o, still early but his development suggest he will play in the NHL (hope they get rid of Hamonic and he's on the team next season)

Jarventie is also very young... 21 y/o since August only... Look at this route, did very well everywhere in men's league, now is starting to produce at a PPG pace in the AHL. His overall game has been progressing a lot too.

Kleven will also be a NHLer, how good remains to be seen but he has a pretty nice toolset and think he can be a Top-4 D-man, just 21 y/o as well.

Merilainen is also just 21 y/o, very young for a goalie... pretty good pro stats in general so far, has shown a lot of potential already

So a minimum of 3 very good picks outside of Batherson and many still in evaluation process, most are 21 y/o and under


As for the last 3 drafts, I agree, we might end up with 2 good bottom-6 forwards (Ostapchuk and Pettersson) and 2 decent bottom-pairing D-men (Andonovski and Donovan)? Too early to say but hard to see these drafts becoming "good drafts" for us

Another thing we might agree is that Dorion was completely out of his league as a GM but drafting is not on top of my list of reasons. Dilapidating assets like a madman at a casino would be a reason over the drafting quality

Should have kept Dylan Demelo and Cosy Ceci.


Stupid asset management

Spent a 3rd in the Ceci trade, got Connor Brown back, who we finally traded for a 2nd but had to take Zaitsev contract which we paid for year until Dorion finally moved it at a cost of a 2nd + 4th. Got a 3rd for DeMelo

Have none of DeMelo, Ceci or Zaitsev and lost a 4th in the process lol

Both DeMelo and Ceci are doing quite well on their respective teams.
 
Last edited:

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
I agree that Pinto and Grieg will likely be impact players for us, but the rest of that list is underwhelming, to say the least.
Unfortunately, Formenton will likely never play in the NHL again as he was really good on the 3rd line.
It is likely, that we won't get a single impact player (top 6 F/top 4 D) from the last 3 drafts. That would be disastrous for a contender, but it's even worse for a team that missed the playoffs each of those 3 years.
That's kind of misleading. Some of that draft capital was used to acquire Chychrun. Some used to acquire DeBrincat. We struck out re-signing DeBrincat. Hopefully Chychrun stays.
 

RickyLafleur

Fall of Pierre
Oct 17, 2013
3,119
2,117
Ottawa, ON
There was no problem with this team outside of Melnyk before Dorion put his footprint. His first trade was Zibanejad + 2nd for Brassard and it all went downhill from there. Sure we weren't contenders before that but since making the finals in 2007 with a one line-team, we made the playoffs 6 times in the next 10 years with 3 rounds won and an ECF (not much credit to Dorion as it was Murray's team). The difference is we never got to rebuild after the team took a nosedive in 2008-09, yet Murray rebuilt it on the fly and we had at least some mitigated success. Remember we couldn't rebuild as long as Alfie was playing... So I don't see the problem before 2017-18, what we needed is making that 2016-17 even better but with Melnyk and Dorion, I think it was just not possible (plus Karlsson-Hoffman saga and tons of injuries, etc)

But looking at the last 10 drafts (so 2014 to 2023)

2014 : was seen as a weak draft, we traded our 1st and got Bobby Ryan who played 455 games for this team and scored 266 pts, which could have been better if he didn't ran into a bunch of injuries (plus personal problems). Sure it took years but Englund seems to be doing well for the Kings now. Is Ryan + Englund good vs that quality of draft? I don't know but not bad at all. I won't count it as a good draft since Ryan wasn't a pick

2015 : just getting Chabot at 18th OA is a homerun in itself. We also got White, Chlapik, Wolanin, Jaros and Daccord who were all pretty good prospects at some point and played in the NHL. Daccord seems to be establishing himself as a NHLer right now. Not sure what happened with White but he should be a bottom-6 forward, sure Dorion totally overpaid him and that kinda derailed his trajectory but surprising he's not in the NHL right now

2016 : first draft with Dorion as the GM, there was hope with Brown, Dahlen and Lajoie but not much out of that draft in the end

2017 : Formenton and Batherson, excellent. Sucks that Formenton is a possible a-hole but can't blame that on Dorion/Sens

2018 : Tkachuk was a 4th OA pick yes but that makes it an automatic great draft for the team. JBD, Crookshank and possibly Mandolese makes it an even better draft for Ottawa

2019 : Pinto in the 2nd was a homerun (if he starts playing lol), Sogaard another possible homerun. Kastelic and Guenette were good picks too, the quality of this draft haul remains to be seen but seems like a good draft for us. Thomson has talent, who knows if ever finds more self-confidence

2020 : one of the best draft hauls by a single team in NHL history

2021 : Ostapchuk might be the only hope, maybe Boucher ends up as an useful 4th liner. Awful draft so far but depending on these 2... it might change

2022 : Pettersson, Halliday and Donovan are good/decent prospects but the hopes are thin at the moment, for sure. Traded our 1st and 2nd for DeBrincat...

2023 : Andonovski looks promising, maybe some of the others will surprise but could easily be another bust draft. Traded our 1st for Chychrun too


2015, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 were good drafts. The last 3 are still huge question marks

Only 2014 and 2016 were bad and possibly the last 3 (way too early to know)

So it's not just Batherson like you initially claimed...

Formenton, Pinto, Greig... all would have been or will be good/great players.

As for the rest, I think you are drawing conclusions quite fast.

Bernard-Docker is just starting to play and is 23 y/o, IMO he will have a long career as an efficient defensive D-man, will not put the pts that will make him earn big money so a cheap reliable D-man. Not awesome for a late first but not bad at all.

Sogaard turned 23 y/o this month... still very young for a goalie, some break out in their late 20's. He's still progressing and has a lot of potential

Kastelic is a success 5th rounder, he's big, elite on face-offs and properly coached can be an effective 4th liner as long as he is physical and defend his teammates. He has a bit of a goal scoring touch too (early for Crookshank but he could be another success 5th round pick)

Guenette also look like a future very successful 7th round pick. I mean, most 7th rounders usually don't even sniff being as good as he has been in the AHL. He's only 22 y/o, still early but his development suggest he will play in the NHL (hope they get rid of Hamonic and he's on the team next season)

Jarventie is also very young... 21 y/o since August only... Look at this route, did very well everywhere in men's league, now is starting to produce at a PPG pace in the AHL. His overall game has been progressing a lot too.

Kleven will also be a NHLer, how good remains to be seen but he has a pretty nice toolset and think he can be a Top-4 D-man, just 21 y/o as well.

Merilainen is also just 21 y/o, very young for a goalie... pretty good pro stats in general so far, has shown a lot of potential already

So a minimum of 3 very good picks outside of Batherson and many still in evaluation process, most are 21 y/o and under


As for the last 3 drafts, I agree, we might end up with 2 good bottom-6 forwards (Ostapchuk and Pettersson) and 2 decent bottom-pairing D-men (Andonovski and Donovan)? Too early to say but hard to see these drafts becoming "good drafts" for us

Another thing we might agree is that Dorion was completely out of his league as a GM but drafting is not on top of my list of reasons. Dilapidating assets like a madman at a casino would be a reason over the drafting quality
You are severely overrating the potential of the players you listed above. Ottawa does not have a single top affiliated prospect with any single publication. I already said that Formenton was good, but will likely never play in the NHL again. I also already stated that Pinto and Grieg are looking like good picks so far.

Year
2nd Round Played in the NHL
Played 100+ games
Sens Results/Notes
2013
23/30
13
Curtis Lazar (17) Playing on the 4th line in NJ
2014
18/30
11
Andreas Englund (40) Playing 3rd pair LA
2015
23/31
18
Chabot (15) Daccord (199), waived in the Seattle expansion draft
2016
24/31
17
Logan Brown (11) and Jonathan Dahlin (42) out of league by 2023
2017
23/32
11
Shane Bowers (28) is the only complete bust in the first round, everyone else has between 70 and 403 GP. Formenton (47) Good pick, but out of the league by 2022. Batherson (121) Home run Pick
2018
18/32
7
Brady Tkachuk (3), current captain and possible 3rd/4th liner Angus Crookshank (126)
2019
22/32
3
Shane Pinto (32) Suspended for half a season for gambling. Possibly 1A/1B in Mads Soogard (37) and Mark Kastelic (125) as the team's current 4C.
2020
14/32
1
Stutzle (3), Sanderson (5) & Grieg (28). The first round was a home run. Jarventie (33) Boom/Bust Pick, but no room in the top 6 for him. Could’ve taken Peterka or Faber as well to have the best sens draft in history.
2021
5/32
1
Tyler Boucher (10) and not a single player drafted after #69 played a single game in the NHL.
2022
4
0
Traded 7 overall for 1 year of Alex Debrincat. Could’ve taken Korchinski, or Minyukov, sens likely take Kasper.
2023
0
0
Only 4 players have played in the NHL so far.


Outside of Pinto's rookie season, not one of them has been a factor for this team. It's even worse when you look past the second-round picks with Drake Batherson as the only notable pick made since 2013. Only 1 other Ottawa Senator played at least 100 games during this time as well, can you guess the other one? Ben Harpur
 
Last edited:

Bileur

Registered User
Jun 15, 2004
18,801
7,671
Ottawa
Been paired with Guénette recently, I think that's a good pairing,

You take the best guy available, if you start prioritizing by hand, you are inherently taking a lesser player. Pick your poison I guess but particularly outside of the first round when success rates are already low, handicaping yourself further seems like a recipe for failure.

Generally, drafting for position is not viewed as a successful strategy, which seems to be what you are proposing, take the lesser player because we are in need at the position, failing to account for the reality that by the time a draft pick us ready, if ever, your roster needs may have changed.

Yeah passing on Kleven for a greater need is exactly the type of thinking that led to mistakes like the Roger pick.

Poster is being influenced by a heavy dose of hindsight.
 

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,412
3,516
Brampton
I think Brannstrom will be the oddman out and an easy piece to move come deadline because of the strides Kleven has made in his development.
 

Ice-Tray

Registered User
Jan 31, 2006
16,621
8,535
Victoria
There was no problem with this team outside of Melnyk before Dorion put his footprint. His first trade was Zibanejad + 2nd for Brassard and it all went downhill from there. Sure we weren't contenders before that but since making the finals in 2007 with a one line-team, we made the playoffs 6 times in the next 10 years with 3 rounds won and an ECF (not much credit to Dorion as it was Murray's team). The difference is we never got to rebuild after the team took a nosedive in 2008-09, yet Murray rebuilt it on the fly and we had at least some mitigated success. Remember we couldn't rebuild as long as Alfie was playing... So I don't see the problem before 2017-18, what we needed is making that 2016-17 even better but with Melnyk and Dorion, I think it was just not possible (plus Karlsson-Hoffman saga and tons of injuries, etc)

But looking at the last 10 drafts (so 2014 to 2023)

2014 : was seen as a weak draft, we traded our 1st and got Bobby Ryan who played 455 games for this team and scored 266 pts, which could have been better if he didn't ran into a bunch of injuries (plus personal problems). Sure it took years but Englund seems to be doing well for the Kings now. Is Ryan + Englund good vs that quality of draft? I don't know but not bad at all. I won't count it as a good draft since Ryan wasn't a pick

2015 : just getting Chabot at 18th OA is a homerun in itself. We also got White, Chlapik, Wolanin, Jaros and Daccord who were all pretty good prospects at some point and played in the NHL. Daccord seems to be establishing himself as a NHLer right now. Not sure what happened with White but he should be a bottom-6 forward, sure Dorion totally overpaid him and that kinda derailed his trajectory but surprising he's not in the NHL right now

2016 : first draft with Dorion as the GM, there was hope with Brown, Dahlen and Lajoie but not much out of that draft in the end

2017 : Formenton and Batherson, excellent. Sucks that Formenton is a possible a-hole but can't blame that on Dorion/Sens

2018 : Tkachuk was a 4th OA pick yes but that makes it an automatic great draft for the team. JBD, Crookshank and possibly Mandolese makes it an even better draft for Ottawa

2019 : Pinto in the 2nd was a homerun (if he starts playing lol), Sogaard another possible homerun. Kastelic and Guenette were good picks too, the quality of this draft haul remains to be seen but seems like a good draft for us. Thomson has talent, who knows if ever finds more self-confidence

2020 : one of the best draft hauls by a single team in NHL history

2021 : Ostapchuk might be the only hope, maybe Boucher ends up as an useful 4th liner. Awful draft so far but depending on these 2... it might change

2022 : Pettersson, Halliday and Donovan are good/decent prospects but the hopes are thin at the moment, for sure. Traded our 1st and 2nd for DeBrincat...

2023 : Andonovski looks promising, maybe some of the others will surprise but could easily be another bust draft. Traded our 1st for Chychrun too


2015, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 were good drafts. The last 3 are still huge question marks

Only 2014 and 2016 were bad and possibly the last 3 (way too early to know)
I think that there was pretty prevalent worries that we were toiling in mediocrity for a long time. I think there was lots wrong with the team all the way through Murray’s reign and into Dorion’s. We weren’t contenders and were trending down. Murray never seemed willing or able to make the moves we needed to take the next step, instead we toiled.

The absolute best thing for us was the rebuild when it was announced. It was the one thing that a team could do somewhat properly while also heavily prioritizing saving money for the owner. Regardless of your hate for PD, he did a fine job getting our core players if nothing else. It could have, should have, would have, been better if we had a different owner and manager perhaps, but we didn’t. Based on what and who we had, the core looks pretty good.

If we had continued to try to ice a regular team through entirety of EM’s budget years, we would still have done nothing and have little to show for it. People already proclaimed the one playoff run as lucky, it’s as good as things were going to get.

Yeah we shed assets and picks for cash that we’ll never get back, that sucks, but the new ownership and management has a wealth of high quality young players to work with, a couple high draft picks to use, and higher class of management group to steer the ship.

PD picking Brady over Zadina, and Stu over anyone else alone gets him a high five from me now that we have a new crew taking it from here. I haven’t felt like we have the room to build a championship team since the cap came into play and we had to start dismantling our legendary squad.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,734
10,622
Montreal, Canada
DeMelo has been fine, but Ceci is sheltered and quite bad on Edmonton.

Having said that, I'd have taken one season of Ceci over the extended chances we gave Zaitsev

DeMelo has been more than fine, he's WPG #2 right now and is doing really well.

Ceci is not as good but has been good with Pittsburgh and now Edmonton in a reduced role. The problem is more the way we used in his last 3 seasons in Ottawa, he's obviously not a Top-10 shutdown D-men in the league

You are severely overrating the potential of the players you listed above. Ottawa does not have a single top affiliated prospect with any single publication. I already said that Formenton was good, but will likely never play in the NHL again. I also already stated that Pinto and Grieg are looking like good picks so far.

ok so the only way a pick can be successful is if he becomes a top affiliated prospect in a publication?

Remember you said "Outside of Batherson, our drafting has been abysmal when you don't factor in top 5 picks"

Formenton, Pinto, Greig : ok so we agree that they were all pretty good picks

That's already 3. For the rest, I am not "overrating their potential", I am listing the guys that could still end up as good picks even though if you already declared all these picks "abysmal"

Kastelic and Guenette are already successful picks based on where they were picked but ok they won't move the needle all that much

Kleven, Jarventie and Sogaard are our 3 best prospects left. You don't think they have a chance to be good players?

Bernard-Docker is already playing in the NHL and has shown good things. Sure he plays on a really bad team but he's fine individually. Merilainen is a 21 y/o goalie, wayyyyy too soon to declare him as a bust.

So what I am trying to say and you seem to resist is that our drafting outside of Batherson and top-5 picks has not been "abysmal" (before the last 3 drafts). I see 3 other really good picks, 3 very good young prospects, a couple of depth guys and a young developing D-man plus a young goalie prospect.

But anyway agree to disagree if you want, seems like you won't rectify your initial position
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PlayersLtd

PlayersLtd

Registered User
Mar 6, 2019
1,472
1,831
Yeah passing on Kleven for a greater need is exactly the type of thinking that led to mistakes like the Roger pick.

Poster is being influenced by a heavy dose of hindsight.
And the Thomson pick which ironically is what that guy is arguing without even knowing it. Wanted us to prioritize RHD which we did with Thomson and it backfired. Not sure how he doesn't see that contradiction.

He tied himself in knots talking out of both sides of his mouth the last two pages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bileur

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,810
15,455
Felt a bit like we were drafting for position, we wanted the next Spezza, and had apparently lost faith in Zibanejad, I loved the pick at the time, obviously in hindsight there were some guys that would have been preferable, ironically I wanted him or Chychrun that year. Kind of got both eventually...

Brown was probably the BPA at 12.

Incredible skill in a 6'6 frame and he put up excellent numbers in his draft year.

We gambled that he'd mature, stop being lazy, and improve his footspeed, as if he had done so we'd have gotten a #1 center out of him.

Have zero problem with the pick, even in hindsight.
 

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,068
5,224
I think Brannstrom will be the oddman out and an easy piece to move come deadline because of the strides Kleven has made in his development.


Kleven looked like a fish out of water in the NHL this year. I think he deserves a shot with a real NHL coach but there is still a tonne of work to be done there to make him a an NHL player who makes a positive impact, IMO.

Those who say we should have drafted Faber have a strong case. And then some.
 

coladin

Registered User
Sep 18, 2009
12,003
4,758
Best to leave Kleven in the AHL for the rest of the season. He needs slow and steady development. Not the yo yo thing between the NHL and AHL.
Kevin Bahl from the Devils last night was pretty solid and they said he spent 100 games in the minors. No rushing him is the best thing. That massive college like hit he laid the other night? Just a sign that he is adapting to the pro game. He was never in a good position to hit anyone before. Game is slowing down for him which is development
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nac Mac Feegle

ottawah

Registered User
Jan 7, 2011
3,654
753
DeMelo has been fine, but Ceci is sheltered and quite bad on Edmonton.

Having said that, I'd have taken one season of Ceci over the extended chances we gave Zaitsev

Lol, Ceci takes the hardest minutes in Edmonton, has for three years. He is thrown to the wolves on a nightly basis. Yet still is scoring average mid 20's, a level that is solidly second pairing numbers (his even strength numbers the last three years are just behind Chabots). And he does not turn the puck over and generally will have the fewest GA/60 on the team.

This anti-Ceci narrative has never stood up to the actual facts, he's a very solid defensive player who puts up second pairing offense despite playing terrible minutes. But because he does not throw big hits, people think he's not useful defensively. He would definitely help out this team a lot.
 

Sens in Process

Registered User
Oct 1, 2012
706
802
Watching B-sens over the holiday, Kleven is really finding his stride and trending toward being a force in the AHL. He really has some underrated offensive potential. He looked awesome in 3 on 3 OT - so big and mobile but also sees and thinks the game pretty well. He is definitely going to be a top 4 NHL D-man, who puts up some surprising offensive numbers.

Kleven is not Ceci. He processes the game much faster. But I agree, I would give him a full season in the AHL.
 

God Says No

Registered User
Mar 16, 2012
8,541
1,916
Best to leave Kleven in the AHL for the rest of the season. He needs slow and steady development. Not the yo yo thing between the NHL and AHL.

Yeah, he needs to spend the whole year in AHL playing meaningful minutes. And some posters (lol Icebucket), thought he would never play a game in the AHL last year.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Kleven doesn’t play in the AHL at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nac Mac Feegle

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad