TSN Top 50 under 24 years old

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
156,489
111,008
Tarnation
i dunno. i think there's a difference between being a great player and being great at contributing to winning.

for example, for the Rangers you mentioned, they may not be as talented as the guys on this list - they're not - but because they play in front of Shesterkin they play winning hockey

I mean, Cuylle is one of the top 5-on-5 point scorers in the league this year and Laf has only one fewer 5-on-5 point than Cuylle. Shesty didn't do that.
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
13,043
19,235
So when TSN ranks the top 50 under 24 year olds they publish an article, but when I do it I gotta talk to HR? I don’t even understand.
 

Mach85

Registered User
Mar 14, 2013
3,901
678
I don't buy the clicks argument. Casual NHL fans are gonna catch wind of Boldy being ranked a few spots lower than consensus and be like "I gotta see this list!" This list is for people like us, who are gonna read it anyway because we like reading about prospects. A purposely bad list isn't bringing clicks either because people don't trust it; why would you waste your time reading a list you already think is horrible?

It makes more sense that ranking prospects/young players is a very inexact science and people have different opinions. HF has always had a problem dealing with lists that aren't consensus, despite the fact that no consensus list is ever accurate in the history of ranking prospects lol.

I can buy having Cowan on the list as a way to get clicks though, because you can put a headline like "Leafs prospect ranked in top 50" and get more Leafs fans clicking because they're the biggest fanbase. Beyond that it just seems like a line people repeat because everyone says it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad