This is a general comment (versus last night), but penalties have a different standard these days it seems. Years ago, iirc a player didn’t get a penalty for knocking a stick out of a player’s hands. But they do today.
I just think that over the long haul (season, half season, whatever), the calls will balance out in the end. Teams need to do enough on their own to win games. I thought the Canes played well and controlled big chunks of the game which enabled them to win.
Stutzle did have a good game though. That was an impressive outing for him. It's too bad either he or other Senators didn’t get more goals which is a big, necessary part in winning games. JMHO.
A conspiracy theorist would argue that there is bias in the league's calling of games.
Generally yes I agree these things balance out over time
But I think there's no doubt that there were two spectacularly bad calls last night that had a direct impact on the outcome of the game.
One called a good goal off
The other created a PP that led to a too many men. The too many men was a legit call but likely doesn't happen without the initial call. The initial call resulted in 2 goals.
So we've got a 3 goal swing stemming from bad calls
We definitely need more goals. You don't win often with one. But 1-1 at the start of the 3rd? I'd take that on the road. And that's probably what the score is 95 times out of 100 if you replay it. From there, it's not just an issue of you need one, they also need one.
Anyway, point taken. This stuff does generally balance out.