Solid post... If one stint in Vancouver is the sole measure of his ability then I guess this means Bruce Boudreau (617W-342L-128T) given his success while there is also a terrible coach. Not suggesting TG is a great coach (or he isn't) and his overall history doesn't matter at all, but I am willing to give him a chance to see how he does and judge him by results. Just a guess... but I assume TG would not have been hired if Martin (whose judgement I trust) and Dave Poulin did not agree with the hire. I can't imagine the team paying those guys and totally ignoring their input.Good coaches win. The great thing about sports is there's always a scoreboard that's publicly visible. Nowadays people will twist themselves into pretzels trying to explain why what's on the scoreboard isn't what actually matters, but it is.
He'll get a fresh start in Ottawa. He'll have a chance to change the narrative. And for all the complaining, if he wins, everyone will shut up, including myself.
But there's no reason to rewrite history and blame others for his past performance. He sucked in Vancouver. Other people sucked too. But he was right alongside them sucking. He's not a scapegoat.
Corrado was asked this question. He mentioned something about an aggressive forecheck. I was hoping he would have provided more detail & expanded on that topic, but he didn’t.I’ve read he likes to employ a dump and chase along with a passive D zone coverage.
Sounds similar to DJ and the opposite of what I would run if I was coach
Green's teams have been known to have fast starts apparently.The we're probably pretty screwed again this season.
I don't have much faith that this roster can dig themselves out of a hole a quarter of the way through the season.
I dont think you understand the definition of nepotism. Those people in hockey ops got there based on their own abilities. They played those NHL games because of their abilities. They got their jobs in management because of the experiences they have had and the success that built them up to the point they are at. Green has had lots of success prior to getting his NHL shot at jr and in the AHL. Thats not nepotism.Nepotism rules the world. It's not about what you know, but who you know a lot of the time. I find it hard to believe that Green was the absolute best candidate. But, what do I know? Currently we have a fanbase that needs to see the playoffs or Andlauer will be losing a lot more than he's gaining with this team. This fanbase is rightfully frustrated and angry after missing the playoffs since 2017. Almost a decade of missing the playoffs will make a fanbase angry. We want results and to me Green hasn't shown a lot of results at the NHL level.
I am willing to change my tune if I see a different team in October. If I see the same team, I am not going give Green a lot of leash as a fan.
He didn't have the greatest team in Vancouver, that tends to lead to more of a dump and chase style by necessity.Corrado was asked this question. He mentioned something about an aggressive forecheck. I was hoping he would have provided more detail & expanded on that topic, but he didn’t.
Where did you read dump & chase, etc.? I’d like to give it a read as this is a topic of interest for me. Corrado didn’t use those words, so it would be nice if a knowledgeable source has more detail specifically on this subject.
There has been plenty of transparency with all the money this group has spent. It doesnt take long to look into it. Even if you didnt, going to the games was a pretty great tell in itself. Theres more staff, better staff more concessions are open etc. But there is a pretty long list of hires since they took over in a short period of time. Which they are going to continue to build on. I dont care if he is making 1.5 million or 3 million they hired him and they did their due dilligence. Thats enough for me to give him a shot.Would greater transparency not serve to dispel organizational misconceptions ?
It means they arent turning pucks over at blue lines. Means they are buying into what he is telling them, thats a good sign I guess. I think a coach can only coach what he has to their strengths. I am sure Green would rather possess the puck but if you dont have the personel to do it, that shouldnt be the game plan.He didn't have the greatest team in Vancouver, that tends to lead to more of a dump and chase style by necessity.
Green is a tier 4 coach in NHL! Just comprehend this!!
-tier 3 coaches make consistently playoffs above 500 record
-tier 2 go deeper into playoff rounds
-tier 1 won the Stanley Cup
Sens are hiring a coach who only once made playoffs and ha an under 500 record.
So these guy are Tier 1 coaches???
1) Marc Crawford (1 cup in 16 seasons and missed playoffs in 8 seasons) 2) John Muckler (1 cup and sub .500 record 10 seasons) , 3) Bob Hartley ( 1 cup in 14 seasons with 6 missed playoffs plus 2 times fired in mid season) 4) Dan Bylsma ( hired with 25 games left in 2008-09 season won cup then no other cup final appearances in 7 seasons) 5) Terry Crisp (won a cup in his 2nd season and proceeded to miss the playoffs in 4 of the next 6 seasons he coached)
Yes, this was addressed in the Mendes interview I believe. Mendes mentioned that Tocchet, Deboer & Cassidy had a below .500 win percentage in their initial 250 games.There are plenty of examples of coaches who failed their first (and second) time around who coached successful and winning teams. Rick Tocchet is doing it right now in Vancouver.
It absolutely isn't a case of "having it or not"
OK, but I’d still like to read whatever I can on this subject. Lots of wildly different posts these days, so getting to things with more substance (if it's legit & available) has merit in my mind.He didn't have the greatest team in Vancouver, that tends to lead to more of a dump and chase style by necessity.
It probably takes a bit more than 10-20 games for a new coach to implement his system and get players to buy in
They play a lot of players who won’t make the club or who might make the club for stints on the 4th line or a call up basis in preseason. I doubt if Preseason games & training camp will provide much of an indication. No doubt they’ll want to get off to a fast start, but 10 games isn’t much of a basis either unfortunately.Not when you factor training camp, preseason. Should be more than enough time.
Lol, especially if they're being held up as an example of maturity. He did not show much in Chicago.People need to stop mentioning quenneville.
In the oft repeated words of Jacques Martin... "no doubt"! Staios shall be judged as much on player/roster moves he is expected to make this summer. Everybody knows his hands were somewhat tied last year. If SS makes no changes with goal tending, for example, there will be hell to pay if that tandem does a rinse, lather and repeat. SS must put his own stamp on this team, and own it, not unlike Green has to do coaching. Decision has been made - live with it. Both will be measured going forward. Not that it wasnt well earned and deserved, but time for there to be far less finger-pointing at the previous regime, organization and fans included. While we can and should demonstrate some patience, it's time to pony up. Personally I take much comfort in the fact that SS has surrounded himself with hockey minds (Martin, Alfie, Poulin) and respect that he's smart enough to seek input assessing options and moves.This is a big move for Staios. If Green performs as many expect, Staios is going to take a lot of heat for trying to be the smartest guy in the room. Fans aren't going to be patient with this choice and a lot of the goodwill the org has built since Andlauer took the reigns will be lost if the team takes another step back this upcoming season. If the team performs well, then Staios will build a massive amount of trust. This is definitely a gamble that, as a Sens fan, I hope pays off.
If he rolls out the same 2 f***ing turds on opening night, I might just lose my mind. Guaranteed failure imo. We've seen enough.In the oft repeated words of Jacques Martin... "no doubt"! Staios shall be judged as much on player/roster moves he is expected to make this summer. Everybody knows his hands were somewhat tied last year. If SS makes no changes with goal tending, for example, there will be hell to pay if that tandem does a rinse, lather and repeat. SS must put his own stamp on this team, and own it, not unlike Green has to do coaching. Decision has been made - live with it. Both will be measured going forward. Not that it wasnt well earned and deserved, but time for there to be far less finger-pointing at the previous regime, organization and fans included. While we can and should demonstrate some patience, it's time to pony up. Personally I take much comfort in the fact that SS has surrounded himself with hockey minds (Martin, Alfie, Poulin) and respect that he's smart enough to seek input assessing options and moves.
Exactly this! A quality defensive assistant coach is critical for this team. Has to be a verteran and a teacher that Green trusts and can work with. Sens can't go with anything remotely like the only previous regime holdover Capuano who had terrible results with the D core the last few years. Has to be a standout who can identify (critical!) and fix D issues.I’m really curios who will be the assistants, these are as critical as the head coach. I want a former D as one of the choices. Jay McKee would be great.
Good. Evaluating the coachs performance starts day 1 for me, so they better be ready first game. Time to put the big boy pants on, as they say.Green's teams have been known to have fast starts apparently.
If we trot out those two turd burglars on opening night then I'll be right there with you losing my mind.If he rolls out the same 2 f***ing turds on opening night, I might just lose my mind. Guaranteed failure imo. We've seen enough.
Thanks for the support lol.If we trot out those two turd burglars on opening night then I'll be right there with you losing my mind.
Don't care anymore how it's resolved. Whatever it takes. Get it done.
Just look at the facts and stats of those teams and you can sort out the BS posts from the actual truth. For example one poster went on about how Green had the Sedins in Vancouver. He did but for their last year where Henrik had 3 goals in 82 games and the brothers were a combined -45. The reality was they weren't very good.OK, but I’d still like to read whatever I can on this subject. Lots of wildly different posts these days, so getting to things with more substance (if it's legit & available) has merit in my mind.