Rangers blowing a 3rd period lead, somethings never change.
The Stat (C)Remember the days when we were something like 8255863-1 when leading going into 3rd.
Rangers blowing a 3rd period lead, somethings never change.
I forgot to mention Meskanen. He looked pretty solid. I watched him a lot when he didn't have the puck (in the O zone) and he seemed to always find the open areas. Solid shot... nice goal and almost another one. Lindqvist had some nice offensive moments but I noticed he gets knocked off the puck pretty easily and not very good in board battles.7-5 final. Oh well, no biggy. Was pretty dominant in the 1st two periods.
Nell was looking really sharp until the 3rd period. Sucked in the 3rd though.
Player of the game, IMO, was Hajek. He was everywhere on the ice making solid plays. Looked really good. HM’s are Andersson, Chytil, Howden. All three looked solid & made nice plays. Intriguing prospects were the two Free Agents; Lindqvist & Meskanen. Both showed flashes of speed & offense. FA invite, Stukel, also showed some offensive ability.
Day, Ronning & Gettinger need to do better....
Looking forward to tomorrow!!![]()
5 years ago, you must have forgot our last 3 years under AV.This makes no sense considering we used to never blow a 3rd period lead.
Because they're sending what they think is a stacked team too. And it's 2 days of practice and 1st game of a meaningless tournament. You look for individual moments, assess how players react to certain situation. You're welcome to give your negative views but people acting like "here we go again" shit is dumb. Some are joking. Others are seriously thinking this is a travesty.All of the people calling people out for "freaking out" and "overreacting", what are you talking about? Are people not allowed to give a negative review after a sloppy loss in a tournament we apparently sent a stacked team to? How is that an overaction and not just an honest assessment?
So you admit this particular thing has changed within from three plus years ago to present day?5 years ago, you must have forgot our last 3 years under AV.
All of the people calling people out for "freaking out" and "overreacting", what are you talking about? Are people not allowed to give a negative review after a sloppy loss in a tournament we apparently sent a stacked team to? How is that an overaction and not just an honest assessment?
It's exciting. Maybe not Quinn Hughes in the summer showcase, but there were times where he just dominated. Beginning of the 3rd period... I think 1st shift... NY had sustained pressure in the O zone for a while and it was all Hajek. Skated around someone with the puck... took a shot... rebound came out, he gets it, gets around a guy... takes a shot... puck kicks around and gets knocked in the air over towards the corner... he's the first on it, comes base line and tries a power move stuff in at the net, then gets back out to position as players are battling for a loose puck.If what Gorton said about who makes the team this season, Staal won't be a common sight on the ice if Hajek keeps improving.
Because they're sending what they think is a stacked team too.
People are allowed to give whatever ridiculous reaction they want. You won't hear me question their right to do so.All of the people calling people out for "freaking out" and "overreacting", what are you talking about? Are people not allowed to give a negative review after a sloppy loss in a tournament we apparently sent a stacked team to? How is that an overaction and not just an honest assessment?
Obviously.So you admit this particular thing has changed within from three plus years ago to present day?