Hemsky4pm2
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2017
- 916
- 714
The retention thing is the issue. It sounds to me like the Oilers are going to trade Jones a prospect and a contract (Stauffer didn't say this, but I think the Oilers should insist on SOMETHING being done by the Hawks for cap relief) for Keith with something retained.
I suspect the Oilers think Keith is a $4M D-man still (reading between the lines of Stauffer's 2nd pairing comments) - and would assign Klefbom's salary $ to that slot for the next two years. That would mean about 1.5M needing to be retained by Chicago. Giving the Hawks Jones + seems overly generous to me and at a certain point you have to say "no thanks". This is why I would want the Hawks to eat more salary or - at bear minimum, take back Turris who will cost the Oilers about $500K in cap space this coming year.
I think a request for Chicago to retain 50% (or find an intermediary to take on a portion of the cap hit) is totally fair and reasonable from Edmonton. Has anyone confirmed yet if Keith actually wants to go to Seattle? The context matters - media reports were "with a Pacific Northwest or Western Canadian team" - that context changes when the teams are actually known. If it's between Edmonton and Seattle, Keith could just say - "Edmonton then".
I suspect the Oilers think Keith is a $4M D-man still (reading between the lines of Stauffer's 2nd pairing comments) - and would assign Klefbom's salary $ to that slot for the next two years. That would mean about 1.5M needing to be retained by Chicago. Giving the Hawks Jones + seems overly generous to me and at a certain point you have to say "no thanks". This is why I would want the Hawks to eat more salary or - at bear minimum, take back Turris who will cost the Oilers about $500K in cap space this coming year.
I think a request for Chicago to retain 50% (or find an intermediary to take on a portion of the cap hit) is totally fair and reasonable from Edmonton. Has anyone confirmed yet if Keith actually wants to go to Seattle? The context matters - media reports were "with a Pacific Northwest or Western Canadian team" - that context changes when the teams are actually known. If it's between Edmonton and Seattle, Keith could just say - "Edmonton then".