SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 53,679
- 36,708
Is it? The playoffs would disagree with you there. The superior skating ability and shot threat enable 88 to thrive in the post-season even as it gets tighter.It's pretty obvious that he's not.
If Florida loses Barkov and Tkachuk, they lose. Heck, if they just lose Bobrovsky, they lose.
PlayoffsIs it? The playoffs would disagree with you there. The superior skating ability and shot threat enable 88 to thrive in the post-season even as it gets tighter.
Marner not so much, say what you will, and I've heard all the arguments before, the speed and structure of the playoffs do not lend themselves well to his game. He is still an outstanding player, but to proclaim him as obviously better than Nylander is something I take umbridge with.
When the games have mattered the most, it has consistently been Willy who has played well; be it statwise or eye-test wise.
Mitch Marner PlayoffsIs it? The playoffs would disagree with you there. The superior skating ability and shot threat enable 88 to thrive in the post-season even as it gets tighter.
Marner not so much, say what you will, and I've heard all the arguments before, the speed and structure of the playoffs do not lend themselves well to his game. He is still an outstanding player, but to proclaim him as obviously better than Nylander is something I take umbridge with.
When the games have mattered the most, it has consistently been Willy who has played well; be it statwise or eye-test wise.
You originally said "players' so I went with that, but I agree they likely wouldn't move JT even if it was possible.It really was just Marner, they wouldn’t have moved JT. I think it’s irrelevant. They chose to keep Marner. Marner also didn’t say he wouldn’t waive.
Yes, it is obvious. Marner has been the better player in both the regular season and playoffs; both statwise and eye-test wise.Is it? The playoffs would disagree with you there. The superior skating ability and shot threat enable 88 to thrive in the post-season even as it gets tighter. Marner not so much, say what you will, and I've heard all the arguments before, the speed and structure of the playoffs do not lend themselves well to his game. He is still an outstanding player, but to proclaim him as obviously better than Nylander is something I take umbridge with. When the games have mattered the most, it has consistently been Willy who has played well; be it statwise or eye-test wise.
Part of the issue is that we stack the top unit, but still don't play it the full 2 minutes. You either have to stack both players and time, or split both players and time.I've always been a stack one PP guy, give your best players the full 2 minutes.