Trades & Free Agency Thread: Off-season Edition

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Updated Capwages a good replacement for CapFriendly. https://capwages.com/

  • Close by no cigar

    Votes: 17 30.4%
  • It will do until something better

    Votes: 31 55.4%
  • I like https://www.spotrac.com/nhl

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • I'm dropping another

    Votes: 6 10.7%

  • Total voters
    56

Buds17

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
8,542
3,568
Logan Thompson would've been a solid add. FWIW, the upcoming season can also be his walk year. Furthermore, he apparently requested a trade in search of a better opportunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
7,507
11,405
Winnipeg
Man I would have traded our 2nd and Robertson for him. Kinda upset we didn’t get him.
I have a hard time believing Vegas would've wanted Robertson. With Holtz plus some of their forward prospects, they've got a fill on offense first types in the bottom 6 now. But yea I would've happily done that trade
 

SprDaVE

Moderator
Sep 20, 2008
53,850
37,070
I'm ok with whatever aav they give Tanev assuming the term is short. If he gets injured as expected we just throw him on the LITR and fill that cap space. If he stays healthy, great.

They just need to target another really good RHD at the minimum. Tanev is fantastic defensively but this team needs more offense and more skating from the back end, especially right handed.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,622
11,401
The next question is, what do we have to offer them?

Yeah that’s the biggest issue.

They just need to target another really good RHD at the minimum. Tanev is fantastic defensively but this team needs more offense and more skating from the back end, especially right handed.

100%. Love what Tanev brings. Now we need to add offense to the backend.
 

Avilaj07

Registered User
Feb 6, 2016
2,082
1,602
Tanev 7yrs x 3.5 mil aav
Zadorov 7yrs x 3.75 mil aav
Roy 7yrs x 4.25 mil aav

Front load all 3 contracts with signing bonuses. Might as well try to circumvent the cap any way we can. And with all 3 players being under 35, we can buy them out if need be towards the end of their contracts
 
Last edited:

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,622
11,401
Tanev 7yrs x 3.5 mil aav
Zadorov 7yrs x 3.75 mil aav
Roy 7yrs x 4.25 mil aav

Front load all 3 contracts with signing bonuses. Might as well try to circumvent the cap any way we can. And with all 3 players being under 35, we can buy them out if need be towards the end of their contracts

Doesn’t work with Zadorov and Roy so much. They are both young enough that extending their term won’t noticeably change their expected AAVs
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
33,889
11,991
I don't know how but does it not feel like we have a trading partner here? They have so many NHL guys and guys knocking on the door for a roster spot...

1719702601259.png
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
33,889
11,991
Treliving likely loves Gudbranson. Don't be surprised if they try to get him with retention.

They are also shopping Provorov

Not sure on cost to acquire Provorov

Benoit-Gudbranson would be physical but would never move the puck.

They should have traded at least two defenders last year. Their Gm has some obsession with hoarding D.

New GM now right?
 

SprDaVE

Moderator
Sep 20, 2008
53,850
37,070
Not sure on cost to acquire Provorov

Benoit-Gudbranson would be physical but would never move the puck.



New GM now right?

I'd only want Gudbranson if they give the Leafs a 2nd round pick for the trouble, similar to the Hayes trade. He sucks but at 2M could be useful depth and stops the Leafs from getting a rental again. He's a tough dude and we have seen struggling physical players rejuvenate lately in Toronto

Provorov has talent but the off-ice is questionable and I certainly wouldn't give up much, I don't see the fit for him.
 
Last edited:

Dreakmur

Registered User
Mar 25, 2008
19,127
7,538
Orillia, Ontario
I'd only want Gudbranson if they give the Leafs a 2nd round pick for the trouble, similar to the Hayes trade. He sucks but at 2M could be useful depth and stops the Leafs from getting a rental again. He's a tough dude and we have seen struggling physical players rejuvenate lately in Toronto

He may not be a top pairing guy, but he definitely doesn’t suck. I’m not sure he wouldn’t be better than Jake McCabe.
 

SprDaVE

Moderator
Sep 20, 2008
53,850
37,070
He may not be a top pairing guy, but he definitely doesn’t suck. I’m not sure he wouldn’t be better than Jake McCabe.

He's not very good but could be useful is the best case scenario. McCabe is miles better.
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
33,889
11,991
I'd only want Gudbranson if they give the Leafs a 2nd round pick for the trouble, similar to the Hayes trade. He sucks but at 2M could be useful depth and stops the Leafs from getting a rental again. He's a tough dude.

Provorov has talent but the off-ice is questionable and I certainly wouldn't give up much, I don't see the fit for him.

I would have done that Hayes deal to be honest, we have a need at centre and could use the pick, how much cheaper is a guy like Wennberg going to be?

That being said, if a retained Gudbranson was offered up, I would definitely consider it.
 

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
7,507
11,405
Winnipeg
I'd only want Gudbranson if they give the Leafs a 2nd round pick for the trouble, similar to the Hayes trade. He sucks but at 2M could be useful depth and stops the Leafs from getting a rental again. He's a tough dude and we have seen struggling physical players rejuvenate lately in Toronto

Provorov has talent but the off-ice is questionable and I certainly wouldn't give up much, I don't see the fit for him.
What's the off-ice issue with Provorov? Anything beyond not wanting to wear a rainbow jersey?

He'd be the perfect add tbh, just wish he was a RD
 
  • Like
Reactions: 57 Years No Cup

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad