I've always thought the best cap site around needed to have the best armchair-GM feature. Everything else is secondary. CapGeek was the original best, then during the period of uncertainty after, it seemed to be a split between who preferred CapFriendly vs General Fanager.
For me, I never liked the General Fanager site and started using CapFriendly immediately post CapGeek. Once General Fanager was gone CapFriendly became the de facto hockey cap site, but I chuckled at anyone who thought General Fanager was a loss. General Fanager always sucked compared to CapFriendly IMO.
Post CapFriendly era has been brief but it's pretty obvious so far that nothing compares to PuckPedia's new PuckGM feature. They seem to be the obvious heir apparent to CapFriendly unless one of the other new sites like CapWages improves their armchair-GM feature at a much faster rate than PuckPedia is able to improve theirs. I think it will end up similarly to CapFriendly vs General Fanager though. PuckPedia is ahead of CapWages to start, and should stay ahead IMO.
Again, I honestly can't fathom how anyone ever liked General Fanager in the first place, and kind of feel the same way about the people who are boosting CapWages now.