LaPlante94
Registered User
- Apr 12, 2011
- 7,230
- 3,604
play. doesn't help he came out and said he's tired of being put in the AHL and should be in the NHL.Really bad, like behavior or play?
play. doesn't help he came out and said he's tired of being put in the AHL and should be in the NHL.Really bad, like behavior or play?
Who and where ?He’s 21 and could be a 40 goal power forward who has delivered big moments in the playoffs already
It will take a long time to find a guy like him
A top pair dman can be acquired in other ways - trading a 1st or top prospect in a package
You sound like dubas too many forward trades we need defencenmenA Schmaltz + Bjugstad deal where we move Domi, whether that’s to Utah or a third team, would be a fantastic move by the Leafs.
I’d also look into a move around Robertson for Krebs.
Ship Pacioretty to Detroit for future considerations.
Knies - Matthews - Schmaltz
McMann - Tavares - Marner
Jarnkrok - Krebs - Nylander
Lorentz - Bjugstad - Steeves
Reaves
We need a really good dman to play with rielly Hes fell off seems like he’s on his retirement tour doesn’t even look like he caresWell, I would argue that we are a win-now team, as in we have a three or four year window opening now. So, if we don't agree on that we won't agree on what moves we should make.
Almost every rental or TDL with term s a player in decline. That's how this works. Having Brayden decline to being a decent 3C with intangibles might work out well on a team that has five or six other 20+ goal scorers. Luke can decline here also if he gives Mo a partner.
My point, however, was that I would not overpay for them. What actual assets are we giving up in these proposals? Robertson? Niemela? 2nd? 4th? We also move out Kampf.
Our window is opening now, but is not only now. I am not interested in moving firsts, Cowan, Minten, Danford, AA, Hildeby, or Grebyenkin for rentals.
yeah, my concern is that we have brought in d-men that we hoped would fit with Mo and it hasn't worked. Tanev for example. I like Luke because we know it worksWe need a really good dman to play with rielly Hes fell off seems like he’s on his retirement tour doesn’t even look like he cares
Tanev works with rielly Hes just better with mccabe cause he actually plays defence that’s the problem we’re going to have no matter who we put with him hopefully whoever we do get is close enough in impact to tanevyeah, my concern is that we have brought in d-men that we hoped would fit with Mo and it hasn't worked. Tanev for example. I like Luke because we know it works
We are soft as butter up front, I’m not giving up a legit power forward who’s not even in his prime for another Morgan Rielly.What on earth? This is so wrong
The guy's been in the league for 5 years now, I think at some point the #2 draft pick pedigree ceases to matter. He's still young and good but at 7m for a winger I'm not sure you're getting much surplus value with his production as you would with Cowan's ELC.
If we're bringing in another high-paid forward on a long-term deal, I'd much rather we spend the money on Bennet in UFA.
Here's the issue, why would NYR do this?
Cowan is a pretty good prospect, but likely not enough for Laf even still.
It’s not like we can trade the pending ufas so I guess we gotta trade him right ?
He’s 21 and could be a 40 goal power forward who has delivered big moments in the playoffs already
It will take a long time to find a guy like him
A top pair dman can be acquired in other ways - trading a 1st or top prospect in a package
Dahlin is one of the best defenceman in the league lol, Reilly isn't nor has ever been in the same stratosphereWe are soft as butter up front, I’m not giving up a legit power forward who’s not even in his prime for another Morgan Rielly.
Not for just anybody but we need to move some forward money on the baccend we have 2 dmen not enough