I get what you are saying and agree with your sentiment.No chance we are for many reasons, just what I think the team would really benefit from. A physical scoring top 6 centre with speed and drive who could possibly push Tavares down, would be a really good fit wherever it is they slot.
Simply put, are the Leafs better with a 2C of JT Miller, signed for $8m, or Mitch Marner for $12m?
I know where my vote is but the Cult of Marnerality will not allow any scenario to be discussed that implies that the Leafs, if they spend the money correctly (and that’s big IF), could be better off without Marner.
JT Miller is a perfect example of a player who fits the Leafs needs better than Marner, at $3-4M less a year than Marner could conceivably ask.
Some folks will get the point being made, that there is life and potential for the Leafs to exist and be even better without Marner, provided the right moves are made.
Others, not so much. Personally, I cheer for the Toronto Maple Leafs. Couldn’t care less about any single player if moving on makes our team better.
It’s Marner’s name that is left to move on from, as the decision was made to extend Nylander and Matthews. Moving on from Marner is the only remaining option to make a significant change to this team, one that a significant portion of this fan base, after watching years of the same, are eager to do something different.
Last edited: