baton elevated
One Man Gang
- Jun 4, 2009
- 1,379
- 857
Are there any comparables in the league right now who had Minten’s production in their D+1 CHL season?Here's an alternative thought: Minten has higher offensive upside than Knies. Knies is just more mature and closer to the NHL at the moment. That's because Knies is also 20 months older.
Conclusion: be very hesitant to trade either prospect but there's more to lose (potentially) in Minten. At the same age Minten is now Knies was under a ppg in a weaker league (USHL).
I'd be selling Sandin much more. I love the guy but we now have a very good understanding of his ceiling.
I'm subscribed to this.
I want to see previous seasons. My point was that that Gavrikov has a history of being a top 4 d-man. Schenn has always been a journey man, because his impacts have always been average to sub par.
Have you read Cam Charron's article on Schenn?
By all available evidence, Schenn would be an underwhelming pickup for his next team. He’s a physical defender that gives up lots of rushes against and a point producer that doesn’t create offence. He’s below average at moving the puck up the ice, is 33 years old and recently missed a game after tweaking something in his lower body. There are lots of red flags.
It’s not very likely Schenn will be a value add for a team in a trade. If I were working for a team and was confronted with this evidence, I might be arguing against my team acquiring him. If Schenn is worse than average on a poor defensive team such as the Canucks, can he even crack the everyday top-six on a contending team like the Boston Bruins, Toronto Maple Leafs or Carolina Hurricanes?
Those looking for a Muzzin replacement that can play a heavy game and give a little scare into oppositions (corner and net front) can look to these three
Chris Tanev (played well with Reilly likes to hit
Zadorv ( huge man , bone jarring hits only 27
Ristolainen ( big man , physical, dirty at times)
Both teams should be sellers.
Yeah who knows what goes on behind the scenes.That first one is kind of a weird tweet. Like, if a trade isn’t done, then why would you ever tell a team they’re out on a player? Just tell them, they’d need to improve their offer. Meier has no trade protection, so it’s not like the player said he wouldn’t go to Carolina
Tanev would be ideal in a lot of ways, but not really an option. Calgary trading for Niederreiter would indicate they see themselves are buyers, not sellers
I'll leave that up to you.Are there any comparables in the league right now who had Minten’s production in their D+1 CHL season?
How in the hell are Vegas in this? They must be offering a ton of picks.
Winnipeg got Nino... not Calgary.
Yeah who knows what goes on behind the scenes.
Maybe it has more to do with Carolina knowing he won't resign there so they thought it was too much to give up for 1 run.... I don't know.
It may be the Canes made their final take it or leave it offer and the response was "we're leaving it".That first one is kind of a weird tweet. Like, if a trade isn’t done, then why would you ever tell a team they’re out on a player? Just tell them, they’d need to improve their offer. Meier has no trade protection, so it’s not like the player said he wouldn’t go to Carolina
I take this as SJ telling Carolina that their current offer is not competitive enough and to either up it or be out of the Meier sweepstakes…That first one is kind of a weird tweet. Like, if a trade isn’t done, then why would you ever tell a team they’re out on a player? Just tell them, they’d need to improve their offer. Meier has no trade protection, so it’s not like the player said he wouldn’t go to Carolina
Maybe Carolinas offer and even an improved offer still wasn’t close to what New Jersey or Vegas have been offering?That first one is kind of a weird tweet. Like, if a trade isn’t done, then why would you ever tell a team they’re out on a player? Just tell them, they’d need to improve their offer. Meier has no trade protection, so it’s not like the player said he wouldn’t go to Carolina
What makes you think Minten has more offensive potential?Here's an alternative thought: Minten has higher offensive upside than Knies. Knies is just more mature and closer to the NHL at the moment. That's because Knies is also 20 months older.
Conclusion: be very hesitant to trade either prospect but there's more to lose (potentially) in Minten. At the same age Minten is now Knies was under a ppg in a weaker league (USHL).
I'd be selling Sandin much more. I love the guy but we now have a very good understanding of his ceiling.
Tanev is still a bit injury prone but much better. He would definitely fit the bill and still 31yr old.
Zadorov is a hulking mean man and loves to hit. In front of the net he doesn't allow any stand ins. He will chop, cross check and break ankles with no qualm.
Are there any comparables in the league right now who had Minten’s production in their D+1 CHL season?
These one-off examples are not instructive. You can easily point to Giordano winning the Norris at 36 as the other extreme. Muzzin was an extremely physical dman for over a decade - that will wear out a player much quicker than usual. Karlsson is the same age as Ekholm and is looking better than ever and about to take down a Norris. Hedman is also 32.
Not to mention that Muzzin was still perfectly effective last year and were it not for the unfortunate injury who knows how long he could have remained a contributor.
I watch flames games because I am out west so i see alot of him. He is tall 6'5 and has a lot of range to keep players to the outside. If he gets you anywhere near the boards you are getting plastered. I like my teams built like the old HABS, large defenses and speedy forwards. It's a recipe that still works. We need that mean element (at least one guy) back there. All our guys are on the soft side.Zadorov sucks…I like the style of player but nah, we’re to quick of a team in transition etc for him. He wouldn’t fit that well with our skill guys. Need someone to push the D down, not a worse third pair guy.
Calgary is built around veterans and this year looks like a goalie driven anomalie.. I can't see them moving out anything the Leafs would want unless its Sutter. Risto is as you say but the pieces don't seem to translate to good results. He is now 5th in TOI for the Flyers. I am a little spooked about any player on that club as they are floundering.Those looking for a Muzzin replacement that can play a heavy game and give a little scare into oppositions (corner and net front) can look to these three
Chris Tanev (played well with Reilly likes to hit
Zadorv ( huge man , bone jarring hits only 27
Ristolainen ( big man , physical, dirty at times)
Both teams should be sellers.
Our second line is ass in transition by merit of how slow ror and jt are. And who cares if our fourth line is good, they're not scoring.Zadorov sucks…I like the style of player but nah, we’re to quick of a team in transition etc for him. He wouldn’t fit that well with our skill guys. Need someone to push the D down, not a worse third pair guy.
Sandin is terrible on the right side.
If Dubas replaces Holl for Schenn, he should be getting a ton of criticism his way, but I doubt it happens.A scathing review from Cam for sure.
Though he is a Holl fan so how good can his analysis be.But sure, seems like it’d be a waste when the Leafs could just up the ante a bit and try to get a guy like Jensen or even McCabe though I’m less of a fan of the latter than the former.