Nah, you need to think that thinking through. I could ask the same question to you, will we win a cup by not signing these players? Doesn't make much sense huh.
Getting a cup-team is not digital / binar or whatever. Its not a 1 or 0.
Are we more likely to win a cup by signing them, that if anything is a legit question.
Actually, Ola, respectfully - you need to think that thinking through.
I think everyone has agreed that this team is not winning the cup with:
A) the current squad this year;
B) the current squad plus whatever tweaks they make, plus Girardi and Callahan on major UFA contracts over the next couple of years; or
C) the current squad plus whatever tweaks they make, with Girardi and Callahan signing major UFA contracts elsewhere over the next couple of years.
Ergo, your most logical choice is to trade them to get the best possible return and look to build a roster that CAN compete in the next couple of years. It IS that digital.
Now, we all agree that you're not going to get sure-fire superstars in return for the assets we have to offer, especially in a cap league. But since this team will never be willing to go full-on firesale (including Lundqvist) and tank for a top five pick, your next best option is
to accumulate as many lottery tickets as possible. Maybe you get lucky and draft another Corey Perry with one of those picks in the 20s. Maybe one of the prospects you acquire turns out to be another McDonagh. Your odds of that happening are SIGNIFICANTLY better if you deal guys who you know aren't going to put you over the top for 2-3 pieces each that might. Best case, several of those guys pan out as top line/top pair players. Worst case, you've got a boatload of midlevel guys that you can use to make another Nash trade - while still retaining depth.
Any other route, and you're just guaranteeing mediocrity until Hank retires.