Rumor: Trade Rumors and Proposals Thread XXV: Season over. Still waiting to begin...

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

s7ark

RIP
Jul 3, 2003
27,579
175
Last thread passed 1000.

Continue here.

Some posts.

I don't disagree that Eberle is tremendous. As I said, I probably wouldn't make the trade. I fully expect a bounce back from Eberle this season. I do think this shows that losing one of the five doesn't kill the team though. I don't think you can look at a plan by it's individual parts.

If u trade Eberle it better mean a good player is coming back - by that I mean letang

I'd rather have Eberle than Letang. Letang's strengths are redundant when we have Schultz. I believe you pay players for what they bring/add. Letang really doesn't add all that much to the Oilers as a RH offensive specialist even if he is the best in the league at it.

Not in a million years would I trade Ebs for a #2/3 defenseman

If we really need the points I'd make a deal for Brian Campbell instead of Letang. Cheaper price. Same value. Second pairing player with great production.

Do we need the points? Offence off the blue line is a bit of a concern, but I'm optimistic that Belov and an improving Schultz will help. I also think Petry could produce more with a more sheltered role. That one is hard to predict though.

I actually see Letang as Eberle - but playing D.

Smooth. Good shot. Soft. Doesn`t always care for playing D. Dangler. Small. 1st line player.

Anyways, wrap this thread up!

On to the next one!

I think lack of versatility amongst half of our defensemen (Smid, Fistric, N Schultz) cost us more than anything. Petry is a great puck mover. Schultz will hopefully grow into that role. Belov will be an upgrade over Potter in that role.

But when they have partners on LD that are terrible puck handlers and can't even make a good first pass it puts more pressure and difficulty on them to start the play.

I feel if Petry was partnered with his LD equal, he'd put up 30+ guaranteed points a year. Same with JSchultz as an offensive threat with a Petry-type LD.

As for Campbell vs Letang. Trust me, it's an equal trade off in all situations. Only difference is age. And Campbell being 1/3-1/4 the trade value.

He's a Norris candidate, he's 26, of dmen have long careers, and he's still young and will continue to improve. He's a number 1 Dman on almost every team in the nhl

My guess is a 3-way between the Oilers, Leafs and Pens.

Struggles terribly in #1 ES role. Obviously thrived on PP. Inflated numbers from being on that team.

Ranger would be a nice addition I think. Klefbom and Marincin are coming in a few seasons.

Ranger - Petry
Smid - Belov
N Schultz - J Schultz

It's significantly better than last year.


Letang is better by a bit in all areas, but I agree that the trade value is not comparable.

As I said yesterday, GM's are flying into New York, so there won't be any deals done.

Thursday there will be some intros, but I'd guess tomorrow will be quiet too. Friday things will pick up, Saturday we'll be hearing a ton of rumors but maybe only 2-3 trades of substance at the most. Sunday will be an absolute frenzy.

It's the calm before the storm.

Proposal:
MPS
Nick Schultz
37th

For

Campbell (1.5M retained)
Matthias

I should also mention, that if you think Ranger and Belov >>> Potter and Whitney, you'd be dead wrong.

If Edmonton wants to upgrade their D, they are going to need two shutdown guys or one two-way top pairing guy.

Even if it doesn't kill the team there is no reason to do it. Guys that can bring what that package does can be found through FA and trade using pieces that weren't 21yo all stars. It's a pointless downgrade.

The more moves required to complete your roster the less likely it is that it's possible. What happens when one of the GMs or FAs changes their mind at the last minute? Then that piece you were counting on to fill the hole you created with another deal isn't there and the Oilers miss the playoff again. It's better to just fill the holes you have at the moment instead of swapping holes and then trying to fill the new ones.

Seems like Letang is getting underrated. I don't think he's worth over $7mil or whatever he's asking for, but he's a #1 dman and a gamebreaker. He's dominated games against us before, like taken them over and won them. He would hands down be our #1 dman and would change the complexion of the team.

But like I said, he's probably asking for too much. I'd be happy with Letang for $6.5mil or so, but anything over that is iffy.
 

The Perfect Human*

Guest
For those calling Letang a true #1 - this season he was the #3 defensemen at even strength with the Pens, playing less ESTOI/game in both the RS and playoffs than both Orpik and Martin.

ORPIK AND MARTIN.

This was the worst batch of Norris nominees ever. Both Subban and Letang playing tertiary ES minutes and racking up points with overinflated PP minutes.

You simply cannot call these kind of players #1 defensemen.
 

AlbertaHockey20

Registered User
Feb 25, 2012
164
0
In response to s7ark.

In the scenario I laid out you would sign Iginla first to fill the top 6, then trade Eberle to fill the 3rd line RW and defensive hole so as not to create holes.

As to the 21 comment, you would be getting two already effective NHLers that are both 22. One projected to be and already playing as a top pairing defenceman. The other an excellent defensive forward with big offensive upside. Both have size and grit. You would be filling a lot of holes. Unlike trading a Hall or an RNH, trading Eberle doesn't leave a gaping hole in the lineup.

For the naysayers, I probably agree with you.
 

AlbertaHockey20

Registered User
Feb 25, 2012
164
0
For those calling Letang a true #1 - this season he was the #3 defensemen at even strength with the Pens, playing less ESTOI/game in both the RS and playoffs than both Orpik and Martin.

ORPIK AND MARTIN.

This was the worst batch of Norris nominees ever. Both Subban and Letang playing tertiary ES minutes and racking up points with overinflated PP minutes.

You simply cannot call these kind of players #1 defensemen.
I think Letang is a legit #1, but I would agree that he is not in the realms of the Keith's, Suter's, Weber's, and Pietrangelo's of the world.
 

The Perfect Human*

Guest
Guys that are better at ES than Letang:

Weber
Suter
Chara
Seidenberg
McDonagh
Phaneuf (yes)
Karlsson
Subban
Pietrangelo
Shattenkirk
Doughty
Voynov
Mitchell
Vlasic
Kronwall
Keith
Seabrook
Hjalmarsson
Josi
Timonen
Enstrom
OEL
Green
Carlson
Alzner
Girardi
Martin
Brodin
Hamhuis
Beauchemin
Fowler
 

ChefTO

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
408
0
Rebuilt D

I posted my rebuilt bottom 6...

One small addition to the bottom 6 would be a trade for Jordan Nolan... let him and Eager compete for the 13/14 forward... Mix in Smyth... so to recap

Clutterbuck Smith Peverly
J.Nolan/Eager/Gordon Hendricks/Gordon Brown
Smyth

(only sign one of Gordon and Hendricks)

This bottom 6 address all the things Mac T was preaching in his presser... Character, speed size grit toughness. It also addresses the depth at C which is needed!

Now rebuilt D

1st off - we signed Belov, no way do we sign Ranger or other suspect / potential dman... Belov is the potential guy... now we need a solid top 4 to round out our d core!

Also if Fistric is wanting to much $$... I would not be opposed to resigning Peckham and having him and Potter battle it out for the 7th spot (and if Klefbom plays his way into the top 6) Let both Potter and Peckham hit the minors... Give Klefbom all the opportunity to succeed, but do not force him into a role he is not ready for!

N. Schultz Boychuck
Smid Petry
Belov J. Schultz
Potter/Peckham
Minors...
Klefbom Marincin
Fedun Davidson

With a new system, N. Schultz will respond, by acquiring J. Boychuck, we can shelter J. Schultz and add size and grit and experience all in one.

Trades required:
J. Boychuck and Peverly for....
J. Nolan for...
Z. Smith for...
C. Clutterbuck for...

I do believe that is a roster that will compete for a playoff spot, and in doing so be very entertaining and tough to play against!
 

Cloned

Begging for Bega
Aug 25, 2003
80,613
69,525
Speaking of Phaneuf, he's so maligned now that he's become very underrated. He faces very very tough competition on ice in TO and if I had to guess at a surprise acquisition by MacT, I'd say Phaneuf could be it.
 

Paralyzer008

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
15,293
5,332
Speaking of Phaneuf, he's so maligned now that he's become very underrated. He faces very very tough competition on ice in TO and if I had to guess at a surprise acquisition by MacT, I'd say Phaneuf could be it.

I would dance around my house and be the happiest guy alive.

as long as it doesn't include Paajarvi, and I wouldn't be thrilled if it involved 7th overall.

Phaneuf is the perfect addition to this team on the left side and I don't think we can get a better fit unless Vancouver is willing to deal us Edler or Bieksa, and I don't think they'd be willing.
 

RipsADrive

Registered User
Sep 16, 2008
9,387
7,237
Edmonton
I guess the buyouts aren't going to start happening until tomorrow morning.

I was hoping there would be some action tonight. I'm getting antsy for hockey (Oiler) news.
 

soothsayer

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
8,924
11,678
I guess the buyouts aren't going to start happening until tomorrow morning.

I was hoping there would be some action tonight. I'm getting antsy for hockey (Oiler) news.

Hate to break it to you, but a buyout can only happen after the player is on waivers for 24 hours
 

s7ark

RIP
Jul 3, 2003
27,579
175
In response to s7ark.

In the scenario I laid out you would sign Iginla first to fill the top 6, then trade Eberle to fill the 3rd line RW and defensive hole so as not to create holes.

As to the 21 comment, you would be getting two already effective NHLers that are both 22. One projected to be and already playing as a top pairing defenceman. The other an excellent defensive forward with big offensive upside. Both have size and grit. You would be filling a lot of holes. Unlike trading a Hall or an RNH, trading Eberle doesn't leave a gaping hole in the lineup.

For the naysayers, I probably agree with you.

Holes can be filled trading prospects, secondary roster players and picks. It happens all the time. Teams very rarely trade star players to fill holes, and they do it is either salary related or the team decides that he isn't the right player for the team. Neither situation fits Eberle.

You can keep pitching it if you like, but I suspect you'll find few people here jumping on your Eberle for Silfverberg + Cowen train.

I guess the buyouts aren't going to start happening until tomorrow morning.

I was hoping there would be some action tonight. I'm getting antsy for hockey (Oiler) news.

Or any news. I don't understand the hold up. It's a shortened off-season, the draft is in 3.5 days, and there are no moves apart from a few signings? What the hell?

I suspect that we'll start hearing waived players tomorrow. And that will lead to signings on Friday.
 

RipsADrive

Registered User
Sep 16, 2008
9,387
7,237
Edmonton
Hate to break it to you, but a buyout can only happen after the player is on waivers for 24 hours

Huh.

I should have known compliance buyouts would follow the same rules as normal buyouts do. At least there should be some interesting players placed on waivers...
 

alphahelix

Registered User
Feb 15, 2007
7,235
3,063
Phaneuf made a lot of mistakes this year... unforced errors... some of them did not result in goals against, but enough did for the TO fanbase to take notice. He is not a stalwart, he puts himself out of position and makes some questionable decisions/fumbles with the puck. You can pick on anyone in these regards, but by my eye he made more than you would expect from a captain. Can't say that he would be any worse than our guys, but he is far from an ideal candidate. We really need someone with their head on straight at the price level we're shopping.
 

soothsayer

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
8,924
11,678
Huh.

I should have known compliance buyouts would follow the same rules as normal buyouts do. At least there should be some interesting players placed on waivers...

It should be interesting. What I think is most interesting, though, is how a player like Brad Richards, who has a NMC, can be placed on waivers and sent to a team that he doesnt want to play for. Does this not violate his contract in some way? I can't figure that one out.
 

aleshemsky83

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
17,908
463
It should be interesting. What I think is most interesting, though, is how a player like Brad Richards, who has a NMC, can be placed on waivers and sent to a team that he doesnt want to play for. Does this not violate his contract in some way? I can't figure that one out.

I believe Darcy Tucker was bought out with a NMC after refusing a trade. They go through waivers regardless.
 

Paralyzer008

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
15,293
5,332
It should be interesting. What I think is most interesting, though, is how a player like Brad Richards, who has a NMC, can be placed on waivers and sent to a team that he doesnt want to play for. Does this not violate his contract in some way? I can't figure that one out.

UNCONDITIONAL waivers, which I believe a player has to waive their NMC or NTC for.

If a team wants that terrible contract, they can claim him. Otherwise, he gets bought out and he leaves. I'm pretty sure unconditional waivers literally means anything can be placed on it for termination of contract purposes.
 
Last edited:

Raab

Registered User
Oct 6, 2007
18,085
2,778
It should be interesting. What I think is most interesting, though, is how a player like Brad Richards, who has a NMC, can be placed on waivers and sent to a team that he doesnt want to play for. Does this not violate his contract in some way? I can't figure that one out.

I'm not sure but my guess would be that he would have the option to not report to the team that tried to claim him. Which leaves the rangers with no option but to buy him out.
 

aleshemsky83

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
17,908
463
Unconditional waivers means you're being bought out, don't think anybody can claim you, different type of waivers.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, probably am
 

HeavyHitter99

Registered User
Jun 18, 2013
4,633
90
Guys that are better at ES than Letang:

Weber
Suter
Chara
Seidenberg
McDonagh
Phaneuf (yes)
Karlsson
Subban
Pietrangelo
Shattenkirk
Doughty
Voynov
Mitchell
Vlasic
Kronwall
Keith
Seabrook
Hjalmarsson
Josi
Timonen
Enstrom
OEL
Green
Carlson
Alzner
Girardi
Martin
Brodin
Hamhuis
Beauchemin
Fowler

I understand what you are saying but being better at ES doesn't make you a number 1. Letang is significantly better than a lot of these players for example Cam Fowler.
 

Raab

Registered User
Oct 6, 2007
18,085
2,778
Letang is horrible, all our d men are better!!! We should never trade for the bum!! :sarcasm:
 

Paralyzer008

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
15,293
5,332
Unconditional waivers means you're being bought out, don't think anybody can claim you, different type of waivers.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, probably am

Ethan Moreau, LA Kings

We were going to buy him out and he got claimed.
 

AlbertaHockey20

Registered User
Feb 25, 2012
164
0
You can keep pitching it if you like, but I suspect you'll find few people here jumping on your Eberle for Silfverberg + Cowen train.
It's hardly a train when I say I wouldn't do it personally.

Additionally, fans of team are a poor barometer of the value of a trade. Oiler fans are pretty good at getting overly attached to players. When you add the detriment of group thinking you don't usually come up with good decisions.
 

AlbertaHockey20

Registered User
Feb 25, 2012
164
0
I understand what you are saying but being better at ES doesn't make you a number 1. Letang is significantly better than a lot of these players for example Cam Fowler.
I agree, but because Letang is a PP specialist that isn't particularly strong defensively or very tough he wouldn't add a ton to the Oilers.
 

Raab

Registered User
Oct 6, 2007
18,085
2,778
I agree, but because Letang is a PP specialist that isn't particularly strong defensively or very tough he wouldn't add a ton to the Oilers.

:facepalm: Have you compared how many points the oilers d has put up compared to the rest of the league over the last 4 years? There's a direct correlation between the amount of points you get from the back end and how well your team does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad