HF Habs: - Trade Proposal Thread: From Here to Free Agency | Page 212 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread: From Here to Free Agency

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
He does until some here start flexing their keyboard muscle and he f***’s off as he should.
Bullshitters get run off yes

He can't respond to the question WHY is it that he gatekeeps the information he allegedly hears or for what purpose is it that he does this coquette act. His worthless punditry is a waste of access.

Is he a reporter? A PR agent for player agencies? A PR agent for the Habs?

What is this role
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaynki
Step 1 : Gallagher and midpick or equivalent prospect to Vancouver for future considerations

Step 2 : Guhle, Dach and 2027 1st (top 10 protected) to Toronto for Knies

Step 3 : Carrier and 2026 1st for Whitecloud

Step 4 : Sign Greer

Slafkovsky-Suzuki-Caufield
Knies-Kapanen-Demidov
Newhook-Evans-Bolduc
Greer-Danault-Anderson
*Texier

Hutson-Whitecloud
Matheson-Dobson
Engstrom-Reinbacher
*Xhekaj, Struble

Dobes
Fowler

Step 5 during the season if needed : Kapanen and one of Hage or Zharovsky for a top 6 center.
 
You guys think we'll be disappointed in HuGo? Everybody and their dogs think we'll make a splash.
I expect mid size moves.

I don't expect us to trade away pieces like Hage or Zharovsky.

So i don't expect we will acquire a big piece at C.

I think we could be more on secondary piece like a Kyrou on offense, Murphy on D, etc

I don't discount the possibility of no move this summer either tbh.
 
Bullshitters get run off yes

He can't respond to the question WHY is it that he gatekeeps the information he allegedly hears or for what purpose is it that he does this coquette act. His worthless punditry is a waste of access.
Well said with your classic style. Could not agree more.
 
  • Love
Reactions: ExpatHabs
Bullshitters get run off yes

He can't respond to the question WHY is it that he gatekeeps the information he allegedly hears or for what purpose is it that he does this coquette act. His worthless punditry is a waste of access.

Is he a reporter? A PR agent for player agencies? A PR agent for the Habs?

What is this role
He looks more like the Habs wannabe social media influencer who's role is to mislead everyone, including the fans and other teams media into thinking what's the Habs next moves are...

That's why it always seems like D'Amico knows something, but actually knows nothing...
 
Last edited:
I expect mid size moves.

I don't expect us to trade away pieces like Hage or Zharovsky.

So i don't expect we will acquire a big piece at C.

I think we could be more on secondary piece like a Kyrou on offense, Murphy on D, etc

I don't discount the possibility of no move this summer either tbh.
I want team to be very hard to play against physically. I want bodies that can punish. On all 4 lines and at least 2 on D.
 

(NOT A RUMOUR, BUT A PROPOSAL)

Montreal Canadiens get:
F Mason McTavish

Anaheim Ducks get:
D David Reinbacher, 2026 second-round pick, 2026 fourth-round pick

Why it works: Montreal's need for a second-line center behind Nick Suzuki became glaringly obvious as the Canadiens stumbled offensively through the Eastern Conference finals against the Canes. Their inability to generate shots -- not to mention goals -- stemmed from a lack of depth down the middle. There's a perfect opportunity to address that issue by bringing in McTavish.

Montreal has shown interest in McTavish before -- inquiring on his status last year when he was at an impasse with Anaheim on negotiating a new contract -- but the Ducks did eventually ink the 23-year-old to a six-year, $42 million deal. But then nothing about the first season of that pact went to plan. McTavish failed to thrive under coach Joel Quenneville, and was a healthy scratch at times while producing 17 goals and 41 points in 75 games. A change of scenery seems like the best course for all involved -- and the Canadiens should be first in line. He has the talent to succeed as part of a young squad that's on a serious upswing.

The Canadiens also have to be mindful of their future. Phillip Danault has only one year left on his deal, and if McTavish were to join now, he could take lessons from Danault (particularly on the defensive end) and provide Montreal with insurance in case the veteran moves on next summer.

To a similar degree that the Canadiens require center depth, the Ducks could use an NHL-ready player on the back end. All three of Anaheim's top defensive veterans -- Gudas, Trouba and Carlson -- are unrestricted free agents. The Ducks could retain one or two, but adding Reinbacher -- the No. 5 pick in 2023 and only 21 years old -- would give Anaheim another potential cornerstone on its blue line. And in a draft as deep as the one coming, collecting picks is also going to benefit the Ducks' long-term goals of transitioning into a perennial playoff contender.

It's possible Anaheim will want a little more of a sweetener for McTavish, so another seventh-round pick being tossed into the mix wouldn't hurt. But it's pretty clear McTavish's time in Anaheim is probably coming to a close, and Montreal is in a good position to give the Ducks a solid return. -- Shilton
 
I know this won't be popular .

But I'd do Guhle for Scheneider + mid round pick and run (away from here).

Lol

You better run!!!

Schneider is so bad. I know I hate the Rangers (not all of them. I actually love Trocheck I just know he won't ever be a Hab) but I promise you that for the past two years he's been really bad. I think if he was a Leaf like Carlo people would actually see it more often. Then again some folks here want Carlo too.

It's like remember Anton Volchenkov? How he used to truck guys and block shots and he seemed like a guy everyone would want and then at some point he was a guy nobody wanted and New Jersey was paying him to be a shell of himself but some people still thought he was good because hey it ain't like he got smaller? That's Schneider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HFFO
You better run!!!

Schneider is so bad. I know I hate the Rangers (not all of them. I actually love Trocheck I just know he won't ever be a Hab) but I promise you that for the past two years he's been really bad. I think if he was a Leaf like Carlo people would actually see it more often. Then again some folks here want Carlo too.

It's like remember Anton Volchenkov? How he used to truck guys and block shots and he seemed like a guy everyone would want and then at some point he was a guy nobody wanted and New Jersey was paying him to be a shell of himself but some people still thought he was good because hey it ain't like he got smaller? That's Schneider.
Fairs but we don't have the same evaluation of the player
 
32 thoughts im pretty sure was supposed to release their podcast today and usually do early, but nothing yet. Cant be that delayed because of Raddysh.

Then again, maybe it just isnt showing up for me
 
That's the thing -- a lot of us in here don't WANT to trade Guhle. No one's clamouring to get rid of him.

However, being objective and also knowing how much the staff love MM for some reason, they're lining up to have almost 20million on the LD side (and one of those guys on the third pair). The cap is going up so maybe that's realistic but also maybe not.

They're not going to trade Hutson, I HIGHLY doubt they trade Matheson after just extending him. That leaves one dude, who's still fairly young and has value.

He fits into the tradable piece category that's desirable around the league.
IMO $5m for a third pairing dman (a good one) is probably the new normal.
 
Yeah? I must’ve missed all the success Utah had. Oh, they didn’t even make the playoffs that year?
So does that mean were ready to admit Matheson is bad?

Why are you so disingenuous?

Whats the downside in acquiring Kesselring here? They literally got paid to take him lol.
 
IMO $5m for a third pairing dman (a good one) is probably the new normal.
Sure but it doesn't have to be, you could pay less if you can put someone there whose cheaper/durable and use Guhle to address more impactful positions on your roster (top 6, top 4).

Just an idea
 
I know this won't be popular .

But I'd do Guhle for Scheneider + mid round pick and run (away from here).

Lol
Louis Crevier from Chicago is who I want.

Go look at his game logs and look at the difference in ice time and quality of play between the first half and second half, where he displayed top 4 quality outings.

I am not saying he will turn into Zdeno Chara, but Chara got his breakout season at 25, which Crevier for this coming season.
Both are 6’8” and 230+ lbs and Chara has the edge on Crevier in toughness, intimidation factor, aggression and fighting abilities, Crevier beats Chara in the skating department and many believe Crevier has the same offensive potential as Chara.
I think Crevier could slot with Hutson and is ready to play top 4, top short handed and 2nd PP minutes.


This allows you to trade Guhle, Engstrom and Struble, which at least one of these is going back to the Blackhawks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HitHard and 417
Louis Crevier from Chicago is who I want.

Go look at his game logs and look at the difference in ice time and quality of play between the first half and second half, where he displayed top 4 quality outings.

I am not saying he will turn into Zdeno Chara, but Chara got his breakout season at 25, which Crevier for this coming season.
Both are 6’8” and 230+ lbs and Chara has the edge on Crevier in toughness, intimidation factor, aggression and fighting abilities, Crevier beats Chara in the skating department and many believe Crevier has the same offensive potential as Chara.
I think Crevier could slot with Hutson and is ready to play top 4, top short handed and 2nd PP minutes.


This allows you to trade Guhle, Engstrom and Struble, which at least one of these is going back to the Blackhawks.
Why would Chicago trade him away?
 
You better run!!!

Schneider is so bad. I know I hate the Rangers (not all of them. I actually love Trocheck I just know he won't ever be a Hab) but I promise you that for the past two years he's been really bad. I think if he was a Leaf like Carlo people would actually see it more often. Then again some folks here want Carlo too.

It's like remember Anton Volchenkov? How he used to truck guys and block shots and he seemed like a guy everyone would want and then at some point he was a guy nobody wanted and New Jersey was paying him to be a shell of himself but some people still thought he was good because hey it ain't like he got smaller? That's Schneider.
Schneider is probably the worst RD in the league lol. Volchenkov at least was very physical. Schneider is nothing special on that end.
 
Louis Crevier from Chicago is who I want.

Go look at his game logs and look at the difference in ice time and quality of play between the first half and second half, where he displayed top 4 quality outings.

I am not saying he will turn into Zdeno Chara, but Chara got his breakout season at 25, which Crevier for this coming season.
Both are 6’8” and 230+ lbs and Chara has the edge on Crevier in toughness, intimidation factor, aggression and fighting abilities, Crevier beats Chara in the skating department and many believe Crevier has the same offensive potential as Chara.
I think Crevier could slot with Hutson and is ready to play top 4, top short handed and 2nd PP minutes.


This allows you to trade Guhle, Engstrom and Struble, which at least one of these is going back to the Blackhawks.
Also a big fan, can't see why they'd let him go though.

But good shout
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad