Might as well consider him not a valid target.How much would it cost to get Tuch?
Might as well consider him not a valid target.How much would it cost to get Tuch?
Crosby’s 38. His play could fall off at any point. Im not giving up that many futures for him. It just seems to risky for 1 or maybe 2 good years. Not sure how he lines up with our contention years as well.I will say this again, the Canadiens should go hard after Crosby. Three firsts and ask for permission to speak with him. Add him and this team will win a cup in the next couple of years. We could keep the first line as is and put Demidov with Crosby on line 1A/B with Laine. The D is already pretty set... we could win a cup as soon as next year.
Utah should add, and we should also remove the third pick.Neither Dach or Newhook are 2nd line players and I think Utah would want a roster player and either Dach and Newhook would be my choice to go the other way, unless they ask for Gallagher or Anderson which is unlikely.
I would do Dach, Matheson, Beck and New Jersey 3rd for Hayton and Lamoureux.
Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkosvky
Laine-Hayton-Demidov
Anderson-Newhook-Gallagher
Heineman-Evans-Kapanen/Roy
Hutson-Struble
Carrier-Guhle.
Reinbacher/Lamoureux-Xhekaj
Mailloux or Engstrom.
There's little reason to think he'll suddenly just drop off. Adding him does the following.Crosby’s 38. His play could fall off at any point. Im not giving up that many futures for him. It just seems to risky for 1 or maybe 2 good years. Not sure how he lines up with our contention years as well.
That's the team you have while Crosby is useful on the ice, then you take a step down with Hage learning the ropes and you need replacements for Evans, Anderson and Gallagher.There's little reason to think he'll suddenly just drop off. Adding him does the following.
1. It opens up a window for a cup win. Probably a good three or four years.
2. It gives us a bridge until Hage gets here.
3. Crosby's influence on young players like Demidov, Slaf, Caufield and Reinbacher can't be underestimated.
We have an excess amount of picks/prospects. It's time to cash in on this. Giving up firsts isn't great but look at the stockpile of prospects we have. Hutson, RB, Slaf, Hage, Fowler, Demidov... these guys are 21 or younger. We have tons of other good prospects to bring up/play/trade. Roy, Beck, Struble, X, Kapenen, Heineman, Engstrom, Mailloux... And then we've got guys like Savard and Matheson we can trade for more picks.
The hard work is done. We've collected a whack of really good prospects. We keep the best of them and we deal the rest. We can afford to give up those three picks. We're at the next stage of the rebuild, it's time to start making the playoffs and building on what we have. Crosby would do so much for us and there's a really good chance we could win a cup in the next few years.
Imagine this lineup:
CC Suzuki Slaf
Dd Crosby Laine
Heineman Evans Beck
Anderson Newhook Gallagher
Hutson RB
Guhle Carrier
Xehjac ?
That's a really good team man. You have lines 1A and 1B. I'm not even sure which one would be better. Imagine the PP.![]()
Evans doesn't need replacing. Anderson and Gallagher aren't hard to replace. They're 4th liners at this point.That's the team you have while Crosby is useful on the ice, then you take a step down with Hage learning the ropes and you need replacements for Evans, Anderson and Gallagher.
Again, the core group is almost all under 25. Hutson, RB, Demidov and Slaf are 21 or younger. We've got a really long window.Who steps up?
Losing all those 1st rounders for a stop-gap, even if it is Crosby, will remove quality candidates to replace players internally and likely force Hughes to overpay for UFAs to fill supporting cast roles.
The goal is the cup. You want to give yourself the best chance. Does Crosby put us in a position to win? I think he does. Does Duchene? I don't think so. I don’t think he’s a bad choice and it’s probably more realistic that we can get him… but he’s not Crosby. I think Crosby makes us immediate contenders.Too risky, IMO.
I'd rather overpay money and term for Duchene whois a good skater and will age well.
7.875M X 4 for Duchene. Front load it and pay mainly in bonus money.
That should be long enough to wait out Hage's arrival (Probably plays 3rd line C in the last year of Duchene's contract) and we would have the first rounders ton shore up the talented depth pieces.
Duchene is definitely my number one target this summer. I'm not sold on Bennett to play with Demidov/Laine. Unfortunately, Dallas will have plenty of cap space to resign Duchene. Just gotta hope that he chooses us.That's the team you have while Crosby is useful on the ice, then you take a step down with Hage learning the ropes and you need replacements for Evans, Anderson and Gallagher.
Who steps up?
Losing all those 1st rounders for a stop-gap, even if it is Crosby, will remove quality candidates to replace players internally and likely force Hughes to overpay for UFAs to fill supporting cast roles.
Too risky, IMO.
I'd rather overpay money and term for Duchene whois a good skater and will age well.
7.875M X 4 for Duchene. Front load it and pay mainly in bonus money.
That should be long enough to wait out Hage's arrival (Probably plays 3rd line C in the last year of Duchene's contract) and we would have the first rounders ton shore up the talented depth pieces.
Really?so interested what KH does to get a 2C
Cernak would be great, but no way Tampa trades him.Ok,
Well, we all know that we need a top 4 RHD, a third-line center, and a second-line center. So let's see 1 option for all of them :
Caufield - Suzuki - Slafkovsky
Laine - Horvat - Demidov
Newhook - Sissons - Anderson
Heineman - Evans - Gallagher
?
Hutson - Cernak
Guhle - Reinbacher
Struble - Carrier
Xhekaj - ?
So what do we do with Mailloux, Matheson, Dach, etc? Are Cernak, Sissons, and Horvat the best options?
So the Habs would need to make an overpayment to pry him out of Tampa?Cernak would be great, but no way Tampa trades him.
By the time Tampa goes to dump him it will be in a few years and he will be closer to Savard than what he is now.
Yeah as Tampa is still competing.So the Habs would need to make an overpayment to pry him out of Tampa?
what would such overpayment look to you?Yeah as Tampa is still competing.
It wouldn't be an overpay to beat out other teams.
It's an overpay where Tampa thinks they're a better team, so you're improving their team.
Cernak is one of top 10 defensive D in the league on a great contract. They are not trading him unless you offer Hutson, Suzuki, Slaf or Demidov.what would such overpayment look to you?
not sure,does anyone think Monty can take us far if we make it ?I wonder if HuGo are regretting not getting some players at the TDL for a playoff run? Even one middle of the road player for the second line would have helped.
He won't but some people believe he can somehow.not sure,does anyone think Monty can take us far if we make it ?
Naw. Stick to the plan, Fowler's on his way.I wonder if HuGo are regretting not getting some players at the TDL for a playoff run? Even one middle of the road player for the second line would have helped.
I suspect not one bit of regret… this is what they’ve always wanted - forcing growth in order to better gather information / evaluate the 53% young core of existing teamI wonder if HuGo are regretting not getting some players at the TDL for a playoff run? Even one middle of the road player for the second line would have helped.
Are you not overstating here?Cernak is one of top 10 defensive D in the league on a great contract. They are not trading him unless you offer Hutson, Suzuki, Slaf or Demidov.
This year + 2 more is their contending window. They are done after that, so we can get him in summer 2027.
He is +28 for a reason (9th in league amongst D), 150 hits, 95 blocks and he is rightie. With 5.2M AAV, his value for Tampa is enormous and he is part of the core which already won 2 cups. They will not trade him for Newhook + 2025 1st.Are you not overstating here?
Crosby is a freak. This isn't going to be a Wayne string bean Gretzky getting 9 goals in his last year situation. Crosby's a workout beast and will still probably hit 90 points this year at 38.Crosby’s 38. His play could fall off at any point. Im not giving up that many futures for him. It just seems to risky for 1 or maybe 2 good years. Not sure how he lines up with our contention years as well.