HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #90: 2024-2025 season part III

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I would go for Cozens asap, lock up a 2C who can actually win draws
Cozens & Dach have the same deficiences - lack defensive awareness & subpar at faceoffs

Cozens, however, has a non stop motor (hence “workhorse from Whitehorse” nickname), and more speed to his game vs Dach
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsCode
Say the TSN trade board this morning and it had Savard at number 4.

Over/Under getting a 2.5 round pick in return for him.....what say you?


Also talk that if Rantanen doesn't come to terms with Carolina, he may be on the move again. Wouldn't that be something
Last year I would have said Savard would get a 2nd. But he has not been good this year.

Posters complain about Matheson’s D gaffes don’t realize how prone Dobson is to unforced errors as well
Matheson is statistically one of the worst defensive defenceman out there. Dobson is not nearly that bad. And he’s better offensively too. What better partner for Hutson if the goal is to have Guhle with Carrier as the stable duo, when the Habs were playing better. Both players on their natural side, it would be similar to Toews-Makar.
 
Some of these roster proposals are mind blowing. Filling half the team with new players and the other half with rookies who’ve never played in the NHL.

Exaggeration undermines the point.

If **all** of Dvorak, Savard, Evans, and Armia are traded that means a maximum of four rookies next year, and almost certainly some of those spots would be covered by rookies or trade acquisitions.

And none of those are core players.

It's not a big deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79
Exaggeration undermines the point.

If **all** of Dvorak, Savard, Evans, and Armia are traded that means a maximum of four rookies next year, and almost certainly some of those spots would be covered by rookies or trade acquisitions.

And none of those are core players.

It's not a big deal.

I would like to keep Evans though. He's not that easy of an asset to acquire. He's like Lehkonen, you trade these players knowing you might quickly try to have to acquire one. The rest are replaceable.
 
I would like to keep Evans though. He's not that easy of an asset to acquire. He's like Lehkonen, you trade these players knowing you might quickly try to have to acquire one. The rest are replaceable.

Say the choice is the following, what do you choose?

1) Sign Evans to a 4-year extension at 4.5 million/year.
2) A 1st rounder from a contender.
 
Dach may not be the solution at center but i still believe he can still be an effective top 6 winger. I'm not trading him right now, especially not if Laine can't be a regular top 6 winger, which is a big concern.

I'd look at getting a second line center and moving Dach to the wing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: austin316
Dach may not be the solution at center but i still believe he can still be an effective top 6 winger. I'm not trading him right now, especially not if Laine can't be a regular top 6 winger, which is a big concern.

I'd look at getting a second line center and moving Dach to the wing.
He could be a good winger and I think they need to put him there
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noble
Dach may not be the solution at center but i still believe he can still be an effective top 6 winger. I'm not trading him right now, especially not if Laine can't be a regular top 6 winger, which is a big concern.

I'd look at getting a second line center and moving Dach to the wing.
Agreed. I’ve been on this for awhile now. He can’t be our long term solution at 2C moving forward. I think he can be a very effective piece for us but it has to be on the wing. We need to find a proper 2C, or 1A with Suzuki.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noble
Agreed. I’ve been on this for awhile now. He can’t be our long term solution at 2C moving forward. I think he can be a very effective piece for us but it has to be on the wing. We need to find a proper 2C, or 1A with Suzuki.
I got to go find a number two center through trade
That has to be a must
 
  • Like
Reactions: austin316
I wonder if we see a lot of moves over the 4 nations break. Would allow for Canadian teams trade to get the visa situation sorted out + moving logistics
 
...Pezz Dispensor is just holding Heineman's spot...why add more waiver fodder??...
You want to think ahead. Good for Laval playoff run. Deep playoff run important developing players. Richard good AHLer. Play couple games here, send him down When Heineman returns. Decent chance he gets thru. Habs be trading veterans at deadline, calling Beck, Davidson up.
 
You want to think ahead. Good for Laval playoff run. Deep playoff run important developing players. Richard good AHLer. Play couple games here, send him down When Heineman returns. Decent chance he gets thru. Habs be trading veterans at deadline, calling Beck, Davidson up.

Likely would get re-claimed if sent down. You'd have to play the yoyo claim like Vegas did with Lavoie.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad