HabzSauce
Registered User
- Jun 10, 2022
- 1,983
- 2,856
I agree that we shouldn't be icing too many rookies at once in bottom six, but not sure I agree we need to hold on to newhook. As is we have:I would hold off from that. Newhook will be a good center insurance piece to have around while Beck and Kapanen are maturing in the winger/center role. Newhook's 2 years left is actually ideal. We have to be very careful with how we transition from guys like Newhook, Armia, Anderson to Beck, Kapanen, Roy, Hage. It will most likely be a process that we have to monitor.
Of course we can trade him in a package if we are after a big fish but lets not jump on Newhook as our next target. He's underperforming to his potential yes but it's at $2.9M AAV. Give him a little break and time to figure it out more. He's been moved around on our roster a fair amount.
Heineman - Evans - armia
Gallagher - Dvorak - Anderson
Armia, Dvorak and Evans are pending UFAs....
Next year once Demidov arrives, newhook will drop down. Id like to graduate Beck at the very least:
Heineman - X - Newhook
Gallagher - Beck - Anderson
So that leaves room for one more guy. Maybe a free agent signing possibly or another rook that impresses at camp....but I think id much rather hold on to one of Evans or armia over Newhook. I think my preference might be armia because Beck will eventually replace Evans.
So my ideal bottom 6 next year would be to trade Newhook and ice this instead:
Heineman - Beck - Armia
Gallagher - X - Anderson
That still gives us 3 vets at the very least