HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #88: 2024-25 Season

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,812
51,779
He's worse now. He's really slowed down. A second is probably his value now just for his pk work. He's a bottom pairing/pk killing D.

Carrier was out in final minutes of last night's game not Savard.

Teams that could use a bottom pairing RD who can PK include: Minnesota (30th), Calgary (27th), Edmonton (26th), Ottawa (24th), Colorado (22nd) & Utah (18th).

Savard to Utah for 2026 2nd & 3rd round draft picks (they have extra picks) would be a solid deal for both teams, especially with Utah pushing for a playoff spot.
I think his value is situational. If there’s a team out there that needs RD depth and not much on the market, I think he can get a second. I agree with you that he’s unlikely to garner a first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

HabsCode

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
3,438
4,082
Hughes said they needed veterans on D when he acquired Carrier. No chance they trade Savard.
This. Savard is still a vet presence and some what reliable in a limited role. If Montreal wants to make overall progress for the reminder of the season, I think they keep Savard until TDL and only trade him if we are still a bottom team and he don’t show sign of wanting to resign here, which would greatly surprise me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boss Man Hughes

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
22,070
11,043
Nova Scotia
Yes, and Dvorak will have interest as a 3rd/4th line guy that can pk. At 50%, he'll be worth his depth player value.

There are teams interested. Toronto fans are talking about him. Minnesota, Dallas, Colorado & Winnipeg will all be interested in adding a 4th line center.

Armia & Savard can both be moved without retaining.

Dvorak can't be moved without retaining.
I would ask for a 2nd for each
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Egresch

Registered User
Jul 10, 2022
1,126
1,564
This. Savard is still a vet presence and some what reliable in a limited role.
I understand that Savard deserves respect, but please open your eyes. He is the worst D on the team now. He is just too slow for the game. We should not be protecting 34y old vet in a limited role. No extension, we will not get 1st or 2nd for him at TDL.
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
22,190
26,449
I'm liking this...



gif.gif


Hughes said they needed veterans on D when he acquired Carrier. No chance they trade Savard.

They will trade Savard AND will get a vet.
 

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
18,756
12,849
I understand that Savard deserves respect, but please open your eyes. He is the worst D on the team now. He is just too slow for the game. We should not be protecting 34y old vet in a limited role. No extension, we will not get 1st or 2nd for him at TDL.
There is no way to know yet. If d are in short supply at the trade deadline a team really needing help could offer more than he is worth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

rahad

Registered User
Feb 3, 2016
2,158
2,643
montreal
They should send Struble in Laval. Can't remember his last game with us. We should probably trade/claim or call up a 28+ vet to be our #7 D.
Is very surprising/weird to see a healthy Habs for once.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,956
158,790
That "glut" of centers is still a ways off, and there's no guarantee all of Beck, Kapanen and Hage will make it. Dvorak will be gone next season. Dach and Newhook may end up being wingers. Signing Evans for four years doesn't mean he cannot be traded away 2-3 years later, should all three of those prospects do hit their potential.

A team can almost never have too much center depth.
Bang on. Taking the foot off the pedal is how this team falls back into the same hole of its paucity at center, that has plagued them for over 30 years..

There are no certainties with young players, you need to develop a lot just to be able to count on the few. Thus, keep adding center talent any which way and use the excess on the wings. This is how a 30+ years funk is broken.
 

General Fanager

Registered User
Feb 2, 2010
12,092
3,803
Chambly, Qc
Kind of ridiculous they didn't give him time to marinate knowing they were choosing between Xhekaj and Barron. But I'm sure he's glad to get an NHL paycheque.
With Xhekaj seemingly turning his game around I think Struble will be moved. There just isn't room for him. Unless Matheson or Savard is moved
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,584
12,980
This. Savard is still a vet presence and some what reliable in a limited role. If Montreal wants to make overall progress for the reminder of the season, I think they keep Savard until TDL and only trade him if we are still a bottom team and he don’t show sign of wanting to resign here, which would greatly surprise me.
He's not reliable.

With Xhekaj seemingly turning his game around I think Struble will be moved. There just isn't room for him. Unless Matheson or Savard is moved
Unless we storm into a playoff spot, Savard will be moved. Matheson should be moved.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad