krutovsdonut
eeyore
- Sep 25, 2016
- 17,584
- 10,336
most likely true. i have struggled to come up with moves i like on the roster and on assets gven up all week.Staying pat may have been the best decision made by the canucks
most likely true. i have struggled to come up with moves i like on the roster and on assets gven up all week.Staying pat may have been the best decision made by the canucks
*lemme change the subject real quick because my argument has been refuted*Then let’s see them dap dump Mikheyev
Hopefully nothing. No one wants to play for that boring ass team anyway.The Kings still have to do something, right? Trying to see where the rest of the chips fall.
Toffoli at that price would have been nice but aside from that I don’t think we missed on much.most likely true. i have struggled to come up with moves i like on the roster and on assets gven up all week.
Insane that Hughes is not even 24 and a half.I agree; this isn't a one-year-and-done team. Hughes is 24, Pettersson is 25, Demko is 28, Hronek is 25, Hoglander is 23, Lekkermaki is 19, and Willander is 19. I know I am including a few prospects, but this is the core age profile of the team. The only issue is Miller at 30.
Nothing about the age of our players suggests that this is a one-and-done.
Doesn't strike me as a contending move to go into the post season with Pod and Lafferty in your top 6So if the Nucks don't make any more moves, what are the forward lines?
Sounds like they want to play Lindholm at C.
So:
Pod-Miller-Brock
Hog-EP-Lafferty
Joshua-Lindholm-Garland
Suter-Blueger-Mikheyev
PDG
I don't like Suter nor Mikheyev in the Top 6 unless absolutely necessary. Possible to swap with Lafferty to mix things up.
Joshua and Garland have chemistry so would want to keep them together.
It's fine but really does show the need for a Top 6 W but looking slim atm.
I’m not changing the subject- you said dumping cap is easy so let’s see them do the easy thing that like you’ve said is the preferable move*lemme change the subject real quick because my argument has been refuted*
But yes, I would also prefer if they cleared Mikheyev off the books. I was against the signing from the beginning.
No retention is horrible.
Literally every other player has been retained on.
I would definitely keep Joshua-Blueger-Garland together. I'd also probably put Lindholm beside EP rather than Lafferty, or shoehorn Kessel there.So if the Nucks don't make any more moves, what are the forward lines?
Sounds like they want to play Lindholm at C.
So:
Pod-Miller-Brock
Hog-EP-Lafferty
Joshua-Lindholm-Garland
Suter-Blueger-Mikheyev
PDG
I don't like Suter nor Mikheyev in the Top 6 unless absolutely necessary. Possible to swap with Lafferty to mix things up.
Joshua and Garland have chemistry so would want to keep them together.
It's fine but really does show the need for a Top 6 W but looking slim atm.
Greenway isn't a bargain bin add with that contractwould love to just bargain bin shop and pickup a Greenway and Eric Johnson type players.
He makes 5.3MWow, Zucker just got a 6th rounder, also cheap.
This x10000.In general it's always better to buy during the off-season. Especially wingers, they get devalued a ton during the summer.
He makes 5.3M
Didn't expect LV to be just above the PO marker.The SN pannel is hard to watch
Talking about how stack Vegas is after their TDL moves
they can literally be outside of the playoffs in 2 days
Look at his cap hit.Wow, Zucker just got a 6th rounder, also cheap.
Mikheyev has been improving a lot the past 3 games playing with Miller and BoeserSo if the Nucks don't make any more moves, what are the forward lines?
Sounds like they want to play Lindholm at C.
So:
Pod-Miller-Brock
Hog-EP-Lafferty
Joshua-Lindholm-Garland
Suter-Blueger-Mikheyev
PDG
I don't like Suter nor Mikheyev in the Top 6 unless absolutely necessary. Possible to swap with Lafferty to mix things up.
Joshua and Garland have chemistry so would want to keep them together.
It's fine but really does show the need for a Top 6 W but looking slim atm.