one2gamble
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2007
- 17,388
- 8,651
maybe?Is Miller really better than Dell at this point?
Hes better insurance down the stretch and in the playoffs than dell. Though I think a 3rd is a bit rich for him as a rental.
maybe?Is Miller really better than Dell at this point?
Is Miller really better than Dell at this point?
Is Miller really better than Dell at this point?
Is Miller really better than Dell at this point?
I mean he has a .928 and .929 save % the past two years soooooo, pretty easy yes.
I thought Miller was basically just playing between injuries at this point though?
maybe?
Hes better insurance down the stretch and in the playoffs than dell. Though I think a 3rd is a bit rich for him as a rental.
"The market has really ground to a halt on a lot of these other guys because of what's happened at the top level," Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman said Tuesday. "So you’ve got a lot of teams waiting for the top three for it to sort out with them: Panarin, Duchene and Stone, and everyone else is kind of stuck until that happens.
"I think there's teams like San Jose who are in on those guys and maybe they’re trying to vulture them for less because there's a big poker game right now, but every time I ask about one of the secondary guys I get told everybody's waiting. So unless I think someone steps up and says I'm determined I have to get one of those guys, I think it's likely the other guys go first."
Where’s it say that? I’m just quoting Rusnonowsky why would he tweet “Boyle”He just got traded to Nashville
SameNot sure what to make of Rusanowsky's tweet. Seems like meant for a private message related to Kevin Boyle???
From the Sportsnet Live Blog (bold mine):
So, it sounds like DW IS in on one of the Big Three? But is just playing chicken betting that the market is depressed enough that no one is going to definitively beat his offer? Who would he most likely be after? Gotta be Stone, right? Perfect fit, makes EK65 happy, since apparently they're really good friends, etc. What do you guys think?
I think Miller probably wouldn't have these types of numbers if he were a starter. He's like the reverse version of guys like Rask, Schneider, Talbot, (or even Jones in LA, although he also had one bad season there too) who put up really good numbers (high .920's% and low .930's%) as backups then level out a bit as starters. Still good, but not ungodly anymore. I think that's what Miller is doing right now.Miller's save percentage above expected is 0.493% this year and it was 0.574% last year. Both were higher than Gibson's. As a starter in Vancouver, he was at -0.102% in 2016-2017 and -0.033% in 2015-2016. This season, Martin Jones' save percentage above expected is -0.633% and Aaron Dell's is -0.69%.
That's not to say that Miller will steal the starting role from Jones, but he will provide some solid insurance and a definite upgrade on Dell. And he has never been as bad as Jones has been this season.
I'm curious to see what our goalie expert, @Bleedred thinks of this.
Its happening bros
Omg, such amazing troll opportunity. Dan should next tweet "Panarin", then 20 minutes later "Done", really get people freaked out.
Nah, he should tweet out "Oops meant Panera."