They should have taken the Eriksson + Spooner deal last deadline, to be honest.
They should have taken the Eriksson + Spooner deal last deadline, to be honest.
Pretty sure it was Eriksson+Koko+1st or close to that as Dom said. Eriksson didn't agree to an extension, and the deal fell through. If Eriksson walked, Koko went to Russia, and we were left with just a 1st, that would've been a horrible move.
Eh maybe not. You would have gotten a good prospect and cap space for a center possibly. Khokhlachev may not have left for Russia either if St. Louis had a roster spot. But of course, we'll never know.
No way Boston offered Eriksson and Spooner. St. Louis probably would have taken that.
I wouldn't call Koko a good prospect anymore.
Bishop probably goes to a playoff bound team that needs a goalie. Probably Dallas.
So the hawks are not going to make one, but two trades within the hyper competitive Central?My bold prediction: Hawks are brutally out of a playoff spot so they trade Panarin(upcoming RFA) to the Jets for some combination of young forwards and Crawford to Dallas for Niemi and picks/prospects.
Don't the Flyers also have playoff aspirations?
Anyone got interest in Marleau?
Don't the Flyers also have playoff aspirations?
Streit @ 50% for a 2nd and low-end prospect/AHL cusp player to either...
Boston, Montreal, Colorado, Edmonton, depending on their playoff aspirations at the time, obviously.
The Sens have a whole in the top 6, would would Marleau realistically cost?