No, the proposal was bad then and is bad now. You should feel bad, it’s actually awful. Kerfoot is a useful player who is sort of a Swiss Army knife that can move up and down the line up.Looking back on this would the Leafs benefit from making either of these deals before the start of the season? Especially if one were retained 50% imagine all the extra cap space we'd have right now.
I'm so sick of this narrative. He's done nothing of significance at the top of the lineup as a winger. He has done even less as a 3C and has been vastly outperformed by Engvall when he has Hyman and Soup on that line.No, the proposal was bad then and is bad now. You should feel bad, it’s actually awful. Kerfoot is a useful player who is sort of a Swiss Army knife that can move up and down the line up.
Last year wasn’t indicative of the kind of player he can be. Between Babcock misusing him and Barrie from day one to having his face caved in and having to play with a birdcage on.
I don't feel bad, I feel good about it.No, the proposal was bad then and is bad now. You should feel bad, it’s actually awful. Kerfoot is a useful player who is sort of a Swiss Army knife that can move up and down the line up.
Last year wasn’t indicative of the kind of player he can be. Between Babcock misusing him and Barrie from day one to having his face caved in and having to play with a birdcage on.
Kerfoot brings nothing to the table that can't be had for the league minimum. The only reason he's a Leaf is because it would look bad on Dubas to give away Kadri for essentially nothing and the Toronto media wouldn't let him live it down.
If Dubas was smart, he'd mitigate his losses and move on from Kerfoot. Bring in someone who can actually PK and provide good value. I'd happily take a guy like Derek Grant who can provide great value for half the cost.