TMLBlueandWhite
Toxic Marner Is Toxic
- Feb 2, 2023
- 2,037
- 2,097
You willingly paid heed to a Damien Cox piece?
You weren't born "just after that period", you were born yesterday.
Good one.
You willingly paid heed to a Damien Cox piece?
You weren't born "just after that period", you were born yesterday.
****ing hell man. Still angry about the game last night?You willingly paid heed to a Damien Cox piece?
You weren't born "just after that period", you were born yesterday.
****ing hell man. Still angry about the game last night?
its most likely a good book with cox and stellick, and gord is about as good as youll find.No.
Cox, Feshchuck, Simmons.
The trifecta of bottom of the barrel scum drudging "journalists" in Toronto.
I've been unwillingly hearing from these idiots for 30 years now.
No.
Cox, Feshchuck, Simmons.
The trifecta of bottom of the barrel scum drudging "journalists" in Toronto.
I've been unwillingly hearing from these idiots for 30 years now.
Almost every week I read most of Simmons column…. I’m guessing I’m no the only one.I can’t understand how they’re still employed
You can't? People talk about them and what they write daily.I can’t understand how they’re still employed
Like playoff teams? You don't say lolDid any listen to Jason Bukala on Kyper and Bourne today?
I wasn’t paying close enough attention to the stats he was throwing out but they weren’t good. I’ll have to listen the podcast, but basically the gist of what he said is the Leafs stars don’t perform as well as other stars when the play against good teams.
Almost every week I read most of Simmons column…. I’m guessing I’m no the only one.
Yes, I was reading his columns when he bashing and trashing those folks, I also listen to the cronies “The Leaf (sic) Report”, been listening to McCown for years, read Cox‘s columns in The Star, watched Coaches Corner and listen to Grape’s podcast.….FYI, I don’t read and listen for confirmation, I do it for entertainment purposes.It's pretty obvious with some of the opinions you share.
Were you on board with Simmons when he was trashing the Sundin Leafs and trashing Quinn, mostly due to being too dirty and employing goons like Tucker, Domi, and Belak?
Were you on board when he was trashing the Leafs in the Kessel era for Phil (the cancer in the locker room - a disgusting thing to call a cancer survivor) because they lacked heart and grit, longing for tougher days of Roberts and Tucker?
Were you on board when he was trashing the Leafs for their obvious lack of skill in the years before Matthews was drafted?
Simmons is a reactionary writer who plays to the emotions of the easily manipulated masses.
The reason he has remained employed is that he has enough of a balance between the "perpetually angry at the team", and the "hate-read" crowd.
I love how Steve Simmons asks Leafs players questions now and they don't answer him seriously.
His articles do have readability the guy is just not an ideal human.
Seems like idiocy to me. O'Neill always comes across as stupid to me and I have little use for stupid people.I'll preface this with:
"I love Overdrive and listen to them on podcast every day"
Not because I agree with them, not because I disagree with them.
Because the dynamic between the 3 is great entertainment.
Yesterday, Hayes and O'Dog got caught with their pants down and I'm loving it as I listen.
4:00 started off with Jeff all up in arms about the response by Mitch to a question.
He wanted the answer phrased a very specific way - share how pissed off the players are about losing, how they feel the games have generally been good, but a few mistakes have led to the losses, not giving up, striving to be better.
For over 2 hours they harped on this.
And then they played the actual clip of the Marner response and it was almost word for word what O'Dog was hoping the response to have been from the start.
"I actually think that wasn't that bad" - Jeff O'Neil
Just like Patrick Roy, I think the Overdrive guys got caught "hot-dogging".
That's just great entertainment...
They were reacting to the twitter post by the hack known as Luke Fox. If you want to take the time, go find his post about the Marner quote, then listen to Marner's interview. Absolutely gutless reporting. I've muted that loser from my twitter feed.I'll preface this with:
"I love Overdrive and listen to them on podcast every day"
Not because I agree with them, not because I disagree with them.
Because the dynamic between the 3 is great entertainment.
Yesterday, Hayes and O'Dog got caught with their pants down and I'm loving it as I listen.
4:00 started off with Jeff all up in arms about the response by Mitch to a question.
He wanted the answer phrased a very specific way - share how pissed off the players are about losing, how they feel the games have generally been good, but a few mistakes have led to the losses, not giving up, striving to be better.
For over 2 hours they harped on this.
And then they played the actual clip of the Marner response and it was almost word for word what O'Dog was hoping the response to have been from the start.
"I actually think that wasn't that bad" - Jeff O'Neil
Just like Patrick Roy, I think the Overdrive guys got caught "hot-dogging".
That's just great entertainment...
They were reacting to the twitter post by the hack known as Luke Fox. If you want to take the time, go find his post about the Marner quote, then listen to Marner's interview. Absolutely gutless reporting. I've muted that loser from my twitter feed.
I mean, anyone who takes in that show for anything other than entertainment needs to take a step back from their keyboard. I agree with some of what they say, and disagree with other stances. But I don't take any of it too serious, and I think that is what makes the show enjoyable. They will laugh at themselves, and others... while touching on most of the relevant moments of sport. It's three hours of not having to think about all the bad stuff going on in our world. I zone out on the golf and Jays talk though, I will admit... NBA too lolI don't have Twitter, so for whatever reason, people's profiles no longer show their tweets in chronological order for me and I just don't go on that site at all.
Which is a phenomenal way to make money on advertising, by the way - make your product as shit as possible so people just pretend it doesn't exist.
Regardless, these guys are professional, ar least Hayes is, and they had 2 hours of hot takes based on absolute garbage.
As much fun ad they are, I can't take their word or opinion on matters too seriously if they are going to be spin doctors.
For all the crap Noodles gets, he is the only one of the 3 who wants big picture and context. Because stuff like this does indeed happen from time to time.
Did any listen to Jason Bukala on Kyper and Bourne today?
I wasn’t paying close enough attention to the stats he was throwing out but they weren’t good. I’ll have to listen the podcast, but basically the gist of what he said is the Leafs stars don’t perform as well as other stars when the play against good teams.
It's pretty obvious with some of the opinions you share.
Were you on board with Simmons when he was trashing the Sundin Leafs and trashing Quinn, mostly due to being too dirty and employing goons like Tucker, Domi, and Belak?
Were you on board when he was trashing the Leafs in the Kessel era for Phil (the cancer in the locker room - a disgusting thing to call a cancer survivor) because they lacked heart and grit, longing for tougher days of Roberts and Tucker?
Were you on board when he was trashing the Leafs for their obvious lack of skill in the years before Matthews was drafted?
Simmons is a reactionary writer who plays to the emotions of the easily manipulated masses.
The reason he has remained employed is that he has enough of a balance between the "perpetually angry at the team", and the "hate-read" crowd.
Seems like idiocy to me. O'Neill always comes across as stupid to me and I have little use for stupid people.
“ Simmons is a reactionary writer who plays to the emotions of the easily manipulated masses.”I don't have Twitter, so for whatever reason, people's profiles no longer show their tweets in chronological order for me and I just don't go on that site .
Which is a phenomenal way to make money on advertising, by the way - make your product as shit as possible so people just pretend it doesn't exist.
Yeah, i love that we need these analysts to tell us what we have been saying for 5 or 6 years. Easiest job in the world if you can get a job in hockey.Like playoff teams? You don't say lol
Sounds interesting, I will listen to that one in a couple of hours.
Caught some of The Leaf Report and they insinuated a similar thing regarding the underlying numbers.