LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2010
- 47,530
- 16,114
I heard he’s not too shabby.Is he good? Should I care? Legit first time hearing the name.
Well that’s kind of the point though. You don’t know until you try.It’s always strange to me how NHL teams view players overseas. Nigel Dawes never sniffed the NHL again despite being one of the KHLs most productive goal scorers of all time. I feel like some of the mystery of a player is more appealing than the actual results.
That’s a pretty big chick. Regardless of which kinda chick you’re talking about5’8 157lbs is chick weight
Difference is teams know those guys are basically tweeners already.But I mean, he's not outproducing a fringe NHL'er...that was my point. He's got the same pts at Petan in 1 more game. Petan was a long-time NHL fringe player. I mean, I guess a guy can come over at 24yo+ and make it but also at 5'8 157lbs, I wince and question how likely it is.
To the point of - why bother?
Any of those teams could have claimed Lavoie, Poulin, Suzuki, ZAR, or Adam Gaudette and got a player with just as much impact.
Nicolas Petan has the same number of points in one less game, for context's sake.
Petan potted a whopping 7g and 35pt in 170 NHL games. Just so we're clear.
But I mean, thats kinda my point. If you look at a guy like Lavoie or Poulin, sure you can say they are tweeners but they are also 20. If at 24, the kid isn't producing better than a longtime NHL tweener, what potential do scouts really see there? Made sense with a guy like Gusev who was potting 71pts in 57gp at 24yo. If he was PPG last year, I'd get it. 0.5ppg, even in the KHL, is still pretty meh.Difference is teams know those guys are basically tweeners already.
He will essentially get a 1 year tryout with someone. If he does well you just got a decent player for nothing. If he doesn't, all you did was pay him a year on an ELC. No risk is pretty appealing to GM's.