Proposal: Toronto-Chicago
- Thread starter Avilaj07
- Start date
I think you'll need a better package then this. A top four RHD, a top six winger, a decorated starting goalie, half retention as same, and taking Mrazek on will cost more pieces that will hurt.
Hawks should hhave to add Dach and trade their unconditional 2022 1st round pick to get this lopsided deal even better
TheNewEra
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2013
- 8,079
- 3,471
should really simplify this
Leafs get
fleury 50%
Hawks get
2022 1st round pick toronto
Mrazek
Robertson
Conditional 2nd 2023 that becomes a third if the leafs dont win a round this year
the first round pick is roughly the value of fleury with retention. The cost for dumping Mrazek is Robertosn and the conditional pick which might be a bit light tbh due to mrazek's term but overall this deal is a lot closer imo
Leafs get
fleury 50%
Hawks get
2022 1st round pick toronto
Mrazek
Robertson
Conditional 2nd 2023 that becomes a third if the leafs dont win a round this year
the first round pick is roughly the value of fleury with retention. The cost for dumping Mrazek is Robertosn and the conditional pick which might be a bit light tbh due to mrazek's term but overall this deal is a lot closer imo
Robertson is a no go. The leafs need low cap impact players. With Amirov’s health he is the only one who fits this bill right now. Knies may soon join but he doesn’t have the offensive upside of Robertson.
Also Fleury said he doesn’t want to be traded
Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 20,979
- 9,101
cslebn
80 forever
- Feb 15, 2012
- 2,787
- 1,356
Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 20,979
- 9,101
Still, the spirit of the offer was good. We need a totally lopsided trade in our favor.
Wow another Leafs offer centered around Kerfoot, Holl, and Mrazek for substantially better players. Hawks with an easy pass on this one. Maybe if the Leafs still had Bracco to add they would have a deal.
Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Chicago doesn’t do this trade. Also, Toronto isn’t going to swing it the other way by dealing 3-4 of it’s top young pieces.
M Ace
Registered User
People always harp on leafs fans for making shit proposals but come up with these way overinflated proposals for leafs trade. Fleury is not getting that type of return
What a joke of a deal. A bunch of nothing from Toronto other than the pick. Toronto adds Nylander to this if we’re serious about making the value equal.
Well, at least you admitted that TML fans make really lopsided and lame proposals, like this one.
You are not thinking about the money side of the deal; this proposal will cost the Hawks over $8m due to the retention of 50% of Fleury’s contract and taking on Mrazek’s $3.8m contract for the next two seasons.
So not only do the Leafs improve their goaltending situation, they create a lot of cap space and save actual $ moving forward. There is a price for that as well, not just acquiring Fleury.
So not only do the Leafs improve their goaltending situation, they create a lot of cap space and save actual $ moving forward. There is a price for that as well, not just acquiring Fleury.
Last edited:
So do a lot of other fan bases, there's just more of us so you get a lot of homers and trolls
The Devilish Buffoon
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2018
- 12,637
- 11,381
TheNewEra
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2013
- 8,079
- 3,471
in case reading is a bit difficult i wrote that fleury with retention is getting a late 1st. Im guessing your issue is with part 2 of the deal and more specifically Robertson but dumping 2 more years of mrazek isnt going to be cheap. Again if you had actually read through the post instead of having an emotional reaction
the hawks are not going to be upset that they have the honor of taking on a bad contract for two years. If you find a cheaper place to dump Mrazek go right ahead
I read your proposal clearly. You're over valuing the retention of fleury, goalies don't typically go for high value, retention or not. Especially 37 year old rentals. And yes, I'm sure mrazek can be traded in the off season without giving up a first or a top prospect
Holymakinaw
Registered User
Dude, you KNOW that's not enough for Chicago to give up their good players. LOL. Jesus.
Dr Danglefest
Lindros|Giroux|Krug
I’m curious as to how the OP viewed the value here?
as in what’s the breakdown?
fluery @ 50% = ?
Murphy = ?
Hagel = ?
Taking on Mrazek = ?
would be helpful to understand the offer with context
as in what’s the breakdown?
fluery @ 50% = ?
Murphy = ?
Hagel = ?
Taking on Mrazek = ?
would be helpful to understand the offer with context
