Proposal: [TOR-PIT] Bunting

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,999
30,659
Leafs need to save their assets to address the middle of the ice. Someone ideally with term who can be 3C this run and take over 2C next year
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
86,320
87,185
Redmond, WA
Honestly, to me it's really just Kampf's deal that is the issue here. I'd consider it more if you made it something like:

Penguins trade Bunting at 50% and Puljujarvi
Leafs trade Jarnkrok, Robertson, 2025 2nd and 2026 3rd

But I also like Jarnkrok and would be willing to gamble on him even with his recent surgery. Adding on Kampf's remaining 3 year deal is an absolute killer that I'd want compensated for, but taking it out makes it more easy to stomach.
 
Last edited:

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
4,170
3,798
Leafs need to save their assets to address the middle of the ice. Someone ideally with term who can be 3C this run and take over 2C next year
2C with term that Tor can fit with their 1 mill in cap space.

Sounds like a VERY expensive piece

Also, if Jarnkrok, Kampf and Robertson are the type of assets you want to use to acquire said piece, yikes
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,206
34,884
St. Paul, MN
Mirtle said the Leafs didn't have a single conversation about an extension in Toronto when he was an UFA. Granted that was pre-Tre but I think he wore out his welcome here.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
43,113
22,037
No to the OP proposal with the biggest issue being too many roster players coming back to Pittsburgh. We can't take on 3 roster players.

Bunting for Robertson+Jarnkork+3rd might be more realistic.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
27,051
14,158
Mirtle said the Leafs didn't have a single conversation about an extension in Toronto when he was an UFA. Granted that was pre-Tre but I think he wore out his welcome here.
Might be because of the leafs not having the 4.5 million in cap he ended up getting, from the 1.9 he was on.
Wasn’t it during the flat cap or 1 million cap increases /year, that he signed also.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,999
30,659
2C with term that Tor can fit with their 1 mill in cap space.

Sounds like a VERY expensive piece

Also, if Jarnkrok, Kampf and Robertson are the type of assets you want to use to acquire said piece, yikes

I count cap space as assets too. I am saying there is no room to add Bunting. Save the cap space and assets for what you need to do. Leafs have lots of good prospects as they have had for years before. Cowan, Danford, Grebenkin, Minten, Chadwick, 1st 2026 I've just listed several A prospects varying from almost NHL ready to a few years away. They have assets to make deals.
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
23,728
28,288
Leafs don't need more wingers... that's the last thing that they should be spending assets on.

Actually, it's premature to really know what the MAIN need is... it might be 3C, unless Minten or Domi step up.... and if it's not 3C, it's probably a RD partner for Rielly... man, I've only been saying that for a decade it feels like.
 

cyris

On a Soma Holiday
Dec 6, 2008
17,203
5,032
3rd Planet From Sun.
I really have next to no interest in a Bunting reunion with the Leafs.
It got pretty rough here towards the end between him and the officials.
 

Aashir Mallik

Backcheck, Forecheck, Paycheque
Apr 19, 2019
12,818
13,690
No interest whatsoever

Bunting shrinks come playoff time and I’m not seeing anything that we don’t already have in Puljujarvi

It’s a nice deal in terms of getting off cap dump Jarnkrok and overpayment kampf but no thanks
 

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,883
7,645
Leafs need to save their assets to address the middle of the ice. Someone ideally with term who can be 3C this run and take over 2C next year

Why wouldn’t the Leafs just flex their deep pockets in free agency depending on who shakes loose? Tavares might need to take a back seat though. You wouldn’t want the Leafs to be in on Sam Bennett if he hits FA?

A Kadri return might also be an option.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad