AuraSphere
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2012
- 4,181
- 2,247
after winning their last 8 games in a row they are now in a fringe wildspot... they were more than cooked.St-Louis is in a playoff spot. They were not trading Schenn.
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Serverafter winning their last 8 games in a row they are now in a fringe wildspot... they were more than cooked.St-Louis is in a playoff spot. They were not trading Schenn.
That kind of consistency is worth a first, IMO.14 straight games without a point and 1 goal in his last 21 games now.
The missing piece.That kind of consistency is worth a first, IMO.
yeah but also intangiblesssssThat kind of consistency is worth a first, IMO.
Maybe.He is nothing more than a solid 4th line player on a good team. Inflated stats on a bad team. He was never going to be the Leafs answer for their 3rd lien center spot. Frankly it is incompetence to think that he ever was going to be that.
We don't want defense we want scoring
And you thought Laughton would give more scoring than Frost?
No I do not understand what I am saying. Laughton is much more than 4th line player. I have only seen him play 7 times. My apologies for offending you.Maybe.
Although when a worse NHL team by far plays him up the lineup, against the same exact competion, for seasons at a time, and he has better results on the bad team than he does on the good team?
You better look into the reason.
Inflated stats on a bad team? Do you even understand what you're saying, before you type it?
this isn't a featureOver reactions here.
Guy is still a 30P 3rd liner locked up for 1.5M. A 1st is steep but that's what 50% retention costs.
I'm sure they could have found a 25 point player in free agency or trade, making less than 2 without giving up a 1st. I think even with retention, you're asking for something tangible enough to make it worth it. A 1st is definitely steep. But who knows, he may score the cup winning goal and nobody will remember what was given up for him.Over reactions here.
Guy is still a 30P 3rd liner locked up for 1.5M. A 1st is steep but that's what 50% retention costs.
I'm sure they could have found a 25 point player in free agency or trade, making less than 2 without giving up a 1st. I think even with retention, you're asking for something tangible enough to make it worth it. A 1st is definitely steep. But who knows, he may score the cup winning goal and nobody will remember what was given up for him.
I'm sure they could have found a 25 point player in free agency or trade, making less than 2 without giving up a 1st. I think even with retention, you're asking for something tangible enough to make it worth it. A 1st is definitely steep. But who knows, he may score the cup winning goal and nobody will remember what was given up for him.
Sounds like he can’t really play 3C thoFor 1.5M? Not a chance.
Not someone who can play #3C and PK.
I'm sure there are plenty of examples where you can find such players in free agency. Last off-season Canucks signed Teddy Blueger to a 2 year, 3.6 million dollar contract (1.8 AAV) as a free agent. He is a 3C/4C, excellent at PK; good faceoff guy. Laughton is the type of player who has always seemed like he is better, or should be better, than he actually is.For what Scott Laughton provides, not a chance you get someone for less than $2m in free agency.
Lars Eller impending UFA solid 3/4C doubt his next deal is more than 2M as wellI'm sure there are plenty of examples where you can find such players in free agency. Last off-season Canucks signed Teddy Blueger to a 2 year, 3.6 million dollar contract (1.8 AAV) as a free agent. He is a 3C/4C, excellent at PK; good faceoff guy. Laughton is the type of player who has always seemed like he is better, or should be better, than he actually is.
Sounds like he can’t really play 3C tho
Yeah I know he used to be, seems like those days are either behind him or he’s not fit to be a 3C on a contending team.Historically he has been
View attachment 1000425
More of a hybrid in the last year. I'll hold judgement for more than 10 games with a new team however.