BKarchitect
Registered User
Low risk, mediocre upside as a PP placeholder who is a complete liability outside some offensive creativity which he isn’t quick enough to unleash reliability at the NHL level.
I chuckle when fans start breaking out the standard hyperbole “low risk but HUGE BIG upside” nonsense with these guys who are well into their mid 20’s (nearly 30 in Gusev’s case) because they flashed some good raw point totals years ago but have since floated to numerous teams because they have giagantic, gaping holes in their games that prevent them from being good or reliable NHL players.
So yeah, it’s low - zero risk. It’s also extremely mediocre upside…as a placeholder until an actual good player is acquired or promoted.
I chuckle when fans start breaking out the standard hyperbole “low risk but HUGE BIG upside” nonsense with these guys who are well into their mid 20’s (nearly 30 in Gusev’s case) because they flashed some good raw point totals years ago but have since floated to numerous teams because they have giagantic, gaping holes in their games that prevent them from being good or reliable NHL players.
So yeah, it’s low - zero risk. It’s also extremely mediocre upside…as a placeholder until an actual good player is acquired or promoted.