Confirmed Signing with Link: [TOR] Matthews extended (5 years, $11.63M AAV)

Status
Not open for further replies.

HockeyDBspecialist

Habs 2019 cup champ
Jan 30, 2018
6,000
3,386
Montreal
They are signing their core to short term deals to win in a 5 year window like the hawks and Pens did. This part I like.

What I don't like is the massive overpay doing this.

so you are giving your team only 5 years to compete ?
I don't get why the 5 years, he is your #1c for 20+ years why can't you sign him for 8 years. I have a feeling like MAtthews will steal Toronto after his 5 years
 

JT Kreider

FIRE GORDIE CLARK
Dec 24, 2010
16,903
15,465
NYC
You have literally no idea what you're talking about lmao.

Nah. Marner and Tavares are better than Matthews that is undeniable. And Andersen is more important to the Leafs than Matthews (just ask the Avalanche with their season going to down the tubes due to goaltending. Or the Flames. Rittich has single handly saved their season).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

Burnie97

Registered User
Jun 26, 2015
14,884
14,014
Canada
IF... and it's still a pretty big IF ... but they win a cup... I think a lot of people will forget about this.

It'll be interesting to see what other RFAs want now .... also the pressure is completely on the player to perform now.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,766
16,910
You can't compare it to Ovie, Sid, McDavid. The money players make is always going up every year.
 

ER89

Registered User
Jul 25, 2018
4,700
4,739
leaf fan... overpayment af. And i love dubas. Wtf is this garbage? This contract is essentially more than mcdavids'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,610
9,997
Waterloo
I wonder how long it takes for the gleeful chuckles at Leaf misfortune to turn to concerned head scratches when people start to consider the ramifications of a potentially major shift in the way RFA's are paid.
 

flamesforcup

Registered User
Sep 5, 2017
3,026
3,539
The contracts 93% bonuses. Arent u supposed to get a discount if you do that? Guess the Leafs financial capital didnt help at all on the Avg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benedictTavares

Tysonson3

Registered User
Feb 20, 2017
727
518
Guess Dubas is gonna have to sign Marner to a 2 year term if he wants to keep him under 11.....
 

member 157595

Guest
Barf.

With that cap hit there should be a hell of a lot more term than 5 years. Brutal. Not surprising though.
 

LetsGoBLUES91

Registered User
Jan 8, 2013
9,188
3,115
It's fair value for his AAV based on comparables, but it's terrible for term.

11.634 on an 83 million cap next year (if reports are true) is identical to malkin's 2nd contract

Yea it's the term that's crazy. 11.634 is a little high for him maybe, but 5 years? He's going to be UFA at 26 and will get the maximum from somebody.
 

BuiumSaveUs

Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
May 2, 2018
19,150
12,071
If he stays at the same level he’s at now, this will look bad. If he become a perennial 50 and 50 guy... this will be just fine.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,623
86,176
Redmond, WA
I don't even think $11.6 million is even that bad for Matthews, I had him pegged at $11 million so this value isn't bad. The problem here is that he's at $11.6 million with only buying out 1 UFA year, that's not a good contract. They gave Matthews an 8 year, 4 UFA year cap hit for a contract that was only 5 years and 1 UFA year, that's not a good deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starry Knight

BusQuets

Registered User
Jul 16, 2010
12,036
2,988
This is brutal contract for Toronto and awesome for Matthews. They couldn't get more term even though they overpaid? Bad just bad.
 

ThatGuy22

Registered User
Oct 11, 2011
10,723
4,393
If it's 11.5 it should be an 8 year deal.

How can he justify 11.5 on a 5 year deal?

He can justify it because the Leafs were willing to give it to him.

How can Dubas justify giving it to him without the extra 3 years is certainly another question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad