LTIR more than likely. I suspect that's the secret plan in Treliving's head. The odds are good that Tanev doesn't stay healthy enough to finish the last few years of his contract.so its going to be a buyout in 2 years
This just reaffirms my belief that the poll section of this site could outperform the average NHL GM.
Winning individual polls isn't the same as winning real life games on a hockey team , Leafs have 4ppg forwards and can't win more than a round in a decade , its not suprising that they lose polls to worst players , they are viewed as losers league wideTim Stutzle vs Auston Matthews Contracts Included
Which player would you take, contracts included? Stutzle: 78 GP 39 G 51 A 90 points, 8 years x 8.350 million beyond this year Matthews: 74 GP 40 G 45 A 85 points, 4 years x 13.25 million beyond this year.forums.hfboards.com
Marner vs Andrei Svechnikov
Who do you take right now? everything it's considering from age, contract, previous experience. Andrei Andrei Svechnikov Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com Mitch Mitch Marner Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.comforums.hfboards.com
Have you ever actually been in the HFboards poll section? Lmao
Or are you one of the posters who constantly votes wrong on polls concerning Leaf players?
Either way, your opinion is hilariously ill-informed
Winning individual polls isn't the same as winning real life games on a hockey team , Leafs have 4ppg forwards and can't win more than a round in a decade , its not suprising that they lose polls to worst players , they are viewed as losers league wide
There is a significant difference. Money paid from LTIR contracts comes from the players' 50% share of HRR. The dummy year contracts were designed to pay more than 50% HRR. And that's why there were cap recapture penalties, to get that extra money back on books to the players' share.More blatant cap circumvention than this you have to look for. It's obvious this deal was only signed to get the AAV down and then ltir him and get rid of the cap hit for the last 3 years.
It's basically like all the frontloaded long term deals signed a decade ago to get the cap hit down.
Would be funnier if it went even longerMore blatant cap circumvention than this you have to look for. It's obvious this deal was only signed to get the AAV down and then ltir him and get rid of the cap hit for the last 3 years.
It's basically like all the frontloaded long term deals signed a decade ago to get the cap hit down.
Robidas island baby!Seems kinda bad towards the end of the contract, no?
Love the player, but it's a bad contract. My condolences.Tim Stutzle vs Auston Matthews Contracts Included
Which player would you take, contracts included? Stutzle: 78 GP 39 G 51 A 90 points, 8 years x 8.350 million beyond this year Matthews: 74 GP 40 G 45 A 85 points, 4 years x 13.25 million beyond this year.forums.hfboards.com
Marner vs Andrei Svechnikov
Who do you take right now? everything it's considering from age, contract, previous experience. Andrei Andrei Svechnikov Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com Mitch Mitch Marner Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.comforums.hfboards.com
Have you ever actually been in the HFboards poll section? Lmao
Or are you one of the posters who constantly votes wrong on polls concerning Leaf players?
Either way, your opinion is hilariously ill-informed
I think he can be good for a couple years and serviceable for a third. Then I think the plan is to hope the NHL doesn't change how LTIR works and have him spend a couple seasons in LTIRetirement.Idk how to feel about Tanev tbh. He's a good deadline pick up when he's having a healthy effective season, but this guy is going to be 35 2 months into the season, has a sizeable injury history, and there's just no telling when the wheels are going to fall off. I think he'll be useful this year, and maybe next, but I don't see it past that point.