Coaches Coroner
Member
- Mar 12, 2009
- 7,599
- 7,947
Never understood why that should be a problem? They are not making the playoffs this year, why should they care where they trade players other than just getting the best assets back?The Bruins trading key players being traded to divisional rivals. Never thought this day would come..
This had better hurt both of these rivals significantly.Marchand to Florida, then Carlo to Toronto?
Shrewd moves Boston, very shrewd.
One of the better deals of the deadline IMO. Compared to the prices being paid for others - a conditional 2027 1st is not bad at all.Laughton and Carlo, man that is not good.
Let's see the price, but a 1st for Laughton was laughingly bad.
tbf he could bounce back in a different situationThis had better hurt both of these rivals significantly.
Unfortunately for Toronto Carlo has been a disaster this season.
Needed to ask this before the trade to get a real answer.How has Carlo looked this year?
Laughton is a 4th liner on a good team.One of the better deals of the deadline IMO. Compared to the prices being paid for others - a conditional 2027 1st is not bad at all.
No he's not lol. He's a 3rd liner on a good team, which is what he is on Toronto.Laughton is a 4th liner on a good team.
Regardless, the games still must be playedCarlo is a decent addition but it won't matter. Florida in the playoffs will be on another level.
Needed to ask this before the trade to get a real answer.
Weird that you care so much then.Watching Leaf fans realize that Carlo is absolutely horrendous will be extremely enjoyable to watch.
I give it 10mins into game 1 until he turns it over 3x trying to get out of the zone for one breakout.
If Laughton is on your 4th line then your team is packed!Laughton is a 4th liner on a good team.