KevSkillz4
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2016
- 7,874
- 13,254
The bottom ten teams are all really bad in terms of prospect pipelines would you sleep better if he ranked the Bruins 29th?How are the Bruins 32nd? Even if you count Lohrei and Poitras as graduated Lysell and Letourneau still exist. Also have some players who project as solid depth pieces like Riley Duran, Chris Pelosi, and Beckett Hendrickson. Also guys like Jackson Edward, Jellvik, and Gasseau. Not sure how that’s worse than teams like Edmonton, Florida, and TBL.
Considering Edmonton is 25 I would sleep better if the Bruins were somewhere closer to there. Bruins prospect pool is not as bad as it was a few years ago, but it seems their reputation of the worst prospect pool has stuck with some of these writers to this day. Bruins have had the worst prospect pool in the league for probably 5 years at least according to these lists despite finding more nhl talent than many other teams like Poitras, Lohrei, Beecher, and others.The bottom ten teams are all really bad in terms of prospect pipelines would you sleep better if he ranked the Bruins 29th?
He probably didn’t like their latest draftConsidering Edmonton is 25 I would sleep better if the Bruins were somewhere closer to there. Bruins prospect pool is not as bad as it was a few years ago, but it seems their reputation of the worst prospect pool has stuck with some of these writers to this day. Bruins have had the worst prospect pool in the league for probably 5 years at least according to these lists despite finding more nhl talent than many other teams like Poitras, Lohrei, Beecher, and others.
Letourneau may have been ranked a bit lower than 25, but we all know teams draft guys like that way higher than they are ranked. He probably would not have been there after 30ish. He had a sick Development Camp and stood out among many NCAA and top USHL players not because of his size but because of his skill. He is raw still, but the ceiling is crazy. The other picks they made seem very solid for 4th round+. I’m not sure what there is to not like.He probably didn’t like their latest draft
Cause their pool is better and deeper...How is Montreal above Columbus ?
How is Montreal above Columbus ?
How is Montreal above Columbus ?
any shutdown defenseman or a player that isn't a big point guy like L. Hughes and Hutson don't exist in his model. Silayev has a 47% chance of making the NHL based off his models.Byron's model goes brrrr
That's whack.any shutdown defenseman or a player that isn't a big point guy like L. Hughes and Hutson don't exist in his model. Silayev has a 47% chance of making the NHL based off his models.
Also a player like Barkov would be way down the list compared to higher point producing Centers even though he's a more complete player.
I was incorrect its 51%. It was the player he compared to which is Erik Gudbranson who was 47%That's whack.
Unless Silayev's progression falls off a cliff a player like him pretty much has a 99% rate of making the NHL.
The NHL loves 6'7 dmen. He can already do a first pass, so he's going to play in the big league one day.
any shutdown defenseman or a player that isn't a big point guy like L. Hughes and Hutson don't exist in his model. Silayev has a 47% chance of making the NHL based off his models.
Also a player like Barkov would be way down the list compared to higher point producing Centers even though he's a more complete player.
I meant Currently, not in there draft year.Barkov graded incredibly high in most NHLe models, he was almost p/gp in a pro league in his draft year.
I meant Currently, not in there draft year.
Depth mostly. His model says Columbus' top 5 (Fantilli, Lindstrom, Jiricek, Mateychuk and Brindley) ranks slightly ahead of Montreal's (Demidov, Hutson, Reinbacher, Hage and Roy), but Montreal has a lot more depth. That's not really a hot take even if you're ignoring NHLe models.
Why slightly?
Columbus has 2 franchise C prospects in their system
+ a franchise Dman and another higher Dprospect