Top and bottom 15 Dman who have played at least 50 minutes 5on5 in relative xGF% for October

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,829
126,414
NYC
One of the top 15 defenseman in the NHL (according to this thread) is being scratched tonight and it seems right. (Justin Barron)

So maybe we are all collectively clueless, or maybe this advanced stats means shit?
Honestly, I don't know anything about Justin Barron, so I won't draw any conclusions on that, but it's more likely that we're all collectively clueless.
 

Obvious Fabertism

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2009
6,575
3,932
MN
Is this raw or GSVA adjusted? Game score adjusting affects expected goals more than most other stats, teams up two or more goals have significantly higher chances for GF and GA due to the opponent needing to take risks to catch back up.
 

Erik Alfredsson

Beast Mode Cowboy!
Jan 14, 2012
13,515
5,811
It shows how useless this stat is that JBD is the 2nd best. He's been very good for Ottawa, but he's a bottom pairing dman, Sanderson, Chabot, and Jensen have all been far better so far, which is to be expected.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,652
17,057
Victoria
You know what, you’re right. I withdraw all prior criticism of this metric, which I suddenly realize is very accurate at determining who plays the best hockey.

IMG-8115.jpg
It's funny, you continue to show you don't actually understand this metric.

This chart you posted isn't the same metric from OP's post.

Is this raw or GSVA adjusted? Game score adjusting affects expected goals more than most other stats, teams up two or more goals have significantly higher chances for GF and GA due to the opponent needing to take risks to catch back up.
I think you mean score adjusted? Based on the outputs, I think OP did not choose a score-adjusted filter.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad