Queen’s University vs Montreal Shamrocks, 14 March 1899
A Montreal paper wrote: “Harriss, the ‘Kid’, did some great work on the wing, and frequently was very dangerous”
Another Montreal paper reported: “Queen’s has two superior men, one is Harris, the other is Hiscock. Harris is a big, brawny wing man, and played on Fred Scanlan. Hiscock is the goal keeper, and he made some really fine stops”
“‘Jock’ Harty was a disappointment to many who expected a great deal more from the doctor, but he was attended to by a member of the legal fraternity in close style, and his chances to distinguish himself were but rare. Dalton showed himself to be a good man, but Jack Brannen was altogether too much for the Granite man”
Final Score: 6-2 Shamrocks
Rosters
Queen’s: Hiscock in goal, Curtis at point, Merrill at cover, Harty, Dalton, Harriss, and Walkem at forward
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Tansey at cover, Wall at cover, Trihey, Farrell, Scanlan, and Brannen
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Queen’s | Harty or Harriss | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Farrell | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Queen’s | Dalton | Harty | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Scanlan | Brannen | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell | N/A | N/A |
Sources: The Gazette, 15 March 1899 page 2 and The Montreal Star, 15 March 1899 page 2
Winnipeg Victorias vs Montreal Shamrocks, 12 February 1900
A Winnipeg paper wrote: “The Shamrocks also got in some fast play and had it at the Winnipeg end when Bain got possession and went down the ice as only Bain can, and scored”
“Bain, who seems to be everywhere, relieved…”
Quoting the Montreal Herald- “Wall, at cover point, cool and collected, lifted the puck the length of the rink as if in a practice game where nothing was at stake. Tansey ably seconded him. McKenna, on the poles, at first had little to do, but that little he did well. Trihey, Brennen, Scnalan, and Farrell worked together almost as if they were parts of one machine”
“Charley Johnstone, at cover point, was a match for any forward, and kept feeding the puck to his forwards with a regularity and sureness which could not help but inspire the greatest confidence in the forwards”
Quoting The Mail: “Gingras’ play was the star feature of the match”
A Montreal paper reported: “And, on the other hand, the work of the Winnipeg forwards was so good that it would be a difficult matter to choose any of them out for special mentino. True, Bain was the king-pin of the lot, but there was not much to choose between him and Gingras, who played a game that will stand out prominently in the annals of this great game of ours”
“McKenna stopped some wonderful shots and saved some sure scores in remarkable style. Tansey and Wall played a splendid game and though both of them were sent to the fence for offences committed it was hardly surprising that in the great heat of the game either of them should have forgotten himself”
“Jack Brannan is easily Bain’s peer in speed, though he is not the same effective combination, where Bain will be yards in the rear and Brannen’s spurts last night were wonderful to behold. The Winnipeg men have a splendid stick handler in Gingras, but they have to deal with Trihey and there is Farrell to be taken into account. Arrell did some work on the ice last night that was wonderful”
“Dan Bain speedily became the favorite of the audience and his work all through was loudly applauded”
“Johnstone’s work at cover was good and the husky Winnipeg man created uite an impression by his style of play”
Final Score: 4-3 Winnipeg
Rosters
Winnipeg: Merritt in goal, Flett at cover, Johnstone at cover, Bain (center), Gingras (RW), Roxburgh (rover), and Campbell (LW) at forward
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Tansey at point, Wall at cover, Trihey, Scanlan, Farrell, and Brennan at forward
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Shamrocks | Scanlan | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Bain | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Farrell | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Campbell or Bain | Roxburgh | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Gingras | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Bain | Campbell | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Trihey | N/A | N/A |
Sources: The Winnipeg Tribune, 13 February 1900 page 1 and 4, The Gazette, 13 February 1900 page 2, and The Montreal Star, 13 February 1900 page 3
Winnipeg Victorias vs Montreal Shamrocks, 14 February 1900
There is a play by play provided by the Winnipeg paper, and Bain is all over it. He sounds like a force in this one.
A Winnipeg paper reported: “Trihey was the star of the Shams, and on the other side Johnstone made a hero of himself, and his feat of scoring two goals from center ice is an unprecedented one in the annals of hockey, and will make his name in a household word among lovers of the game. Flett is also a marvel, and was time and again applauded for his neat, clean lifts and cool-headed work. The Winnipeg forward line did magnificent individual work, and the checking was close and desperately swift. The indefatigable Bain was several times on the point of scoring, and the impetuosity of his rushes was a feature of the play. Gingras did not make the sensational hits of the previous match but no man could do that twice. Roxburgh was more than once prevented from registering a score by the nearest margin, and Campbell got in a number of hot shots in his usual cool style”
“McKenna in goal and Tansey at point cover the net with surprising agility”
“At it again and in exactly one minute the greatest cover point in the world [referring to Johnstone] had the puck on centre ice and shot again with the same result. Another goal for the Pegs”
A Montreal paper wrote: “Captain Trihey out generaled Captain Bain”
“Then Shamrock appeared stronger. This was especially so with Farrell and Scanlan. The work these men performed, finishing strong and willing at that, would have prostrated ordinary men. Their pluck and gameness went a long way in the Shamrock’s success. At the outset Gingras’ speed and quick recovery bothered Scanlan, but later the gritty Shamrock wing, standing up under a continuous run of the hardest body work and checking any defence can administer to an overly aggressive forward, got his man in limbo. With the trying finish poor Gingras absolutely wilted and done was no match for the great little Irishman”
“Farrell’s work came early in the first half. Farrell cut a merry pace that made Campbell stand to right from the initial whistle. Unlike Scanlan Farrell had his man well in hand at all stages. He was the Shamrock’s wing work that counted last night, and Farrell and Scanlan did the work. In centre ice Captain Trihey’s superb stick handling will scarcely ever be equalled in championship again. His generalship though was the key note. In hard straight hockey Bain and Roxburgh last night lost nothing by contrast with Trihey’s and Brannen’s game- Brannen, perhaps, had a shafe the better of Roxburgh, and certainly gained territory on Wall’s lifts through his speed than did the Winnipeg man in following Johnstone’s and Flett’s relief pucks up the ice”
“Winnipeg’s defence in close, confined, haphazard work are unbeatable. Johnstone and Flett are the strongest and hardest pair ever standing before a hockey goal. It is different, though, in breaking up a forward system such as the Shamrock’s possess”
“Flett was tough and strong”
“Johnstone’s lifting was always off, Wall distancing him in this respect. Johnstone’s and lett’s excessive predilection for lifting was decidedly trying on the quartett in the line ahead. Wall’s lifting, on the other hand, was of the right king, judiciously employed, generally with his men hanged about Merritt’s flags”
“Tansey’s point game was a fin exhibition of brainy hockey. Both he and Wall brought the gypsum out time and again centering to their forwards with an [unclear] gain. Tansey’s blocking of Campbell’s surface pucks was a feature of the work behind either the Shamrock or Victoria lines”
Another Montreal paper noted: “Both Campbell and GIngras played a strong, effective game, but they had not the same opportunities as on Monday night, and there were not the same wide openings for them to go through. Both Scanlan and Farrell played a far superior game and Scan’s work was particularly good. He carried the puck out time after time, and went down the ice in great style, and had he been fortunate in his shooting there ought to have been some goals to his credit. Farrell did well, and when it is understood that he was suffering from a peculiar indisposition, the excellence of his work will be better appreciated. Jack Brannen’s speed was a great factor in the game, and his work was a vast improvement over his previous form. Harry Trihey showed cool generalship, and his work was in every way worthy of the leader of such a splendid team”
“Wall’s lifts and rushes and Tansey’s stops and rushes were features”
“McKenna’s work was just right”
“Their defence was good, and Johnston played a particularly good game. Flett seemed to have fallen off a bit, but ‘Whitey’ Merritt exhibited his usual skill”
Final Score: 3-2 Shamrocks
Rosters
Winnipeg: Merritt in goal, Flett at point, Johnstone at cover, Blain (rover), Campbell, Roxburgh (center), and Gingras at forward
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Tansey at point, Wall at cover, Farrell, Scanlan, Trihey, and Brannen at forward
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Scanlan | Brannen |
| Winnipeg | Johnstone or Campbell | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Johnstone or Bain | Maybe Johnstone | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Brannen or Trihey | Farrell | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Scanlan | N/A |
Sources: The Winnipeg Tribune, 15 February 1900 page 1 and 4, The Gazette, 15 February 1900 page 2, and The Montreal Star, 15 February 1900 page 3
Winnipeg Victorias vs Montreal Shamrocks, 16 February 1900
A Winnipeg paper reported: “...the puck was faced at 8:32 between the sticks of the cyclonic Trihey and irrepressible Roxburgh”
“Bain is the greatest player on the ice, for he is doubly guarded, and keeps two of the Shamrocks humping to hold him down. Gingras makes his Napoleonic rushes with marvellous effect, while Roxburgh and Campbell simply set their teeth and keep going with the tireless pertinacity of devils”
A Montreal paper noted: “Johnstone and Flett are a splendid pair to have in front of a goal, and they stood off the Shamrock attacks as no other team has done”
Final Score: 5-4 Shamrocks
Rosters
Winnipeg: Merritt in goal, Flett at point, Johnstone at cover, Bain, Gingras, Campbell, and Roxburgh at forward
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Tansey at point, Wall at cover, Trihey, Farrell, Scanlan, and Brannen at forward
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Wall | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Gingras or Bain | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Bain | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Farrell | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Brannen or Scanlan | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Gingras | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Roxburgh or Bain or Gingras | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Brannen | N/A |
Sources: The Winnipeg Tribune, 17 February 1900 page 1 and 4, The Gazette, 17 February 1900 page 2, and The Montreal Star, 17 February 1900 page 19
Series Scoring Table:
| Name | Team | Goals | Assists | Points |
| Trihey | Shamrocks | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Farrell | Shamrocks | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Bain | Winnipeg | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Scanlan | Shamrocks | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Gingras | Winnipeg | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Brannen | Shamrocks | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Campell | Winnipeg | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roxburgh | Winnipeg | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wall | Shamrocks | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| | | | |
| Maybe Johnstone | Winnipeg | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| | | | |
| Bain or Campbell | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bain or Gingras | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bain, Gingras, or Roxburgh | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Baine or Johnstone | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Brannen or Farrell or Scanlan | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Brannen or Trihey | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Campbell or Johnstone | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Halifax Crescents vs Montreal Shamrocks, 5 March 1900
A Montreal paper wrote: “Maher and McInnes are the Crescent stars. Maher kept Scanlan guessing more than once. He has speed, strength and a beautiful changeover puck from the side that made McKenna blink. McInnes found a Tartar in Farrell. The visitors left wing tenaciously hung on though, fighting gamely every inch. Crockett, in centre, shows a nice turn of speed. He is the general of the forwards, playing fast, unselfish hockey. Kane at point evinces a strong tendency for roughing it. Otherwise he is the right little man in the proper place. Captain Mullane’s run from ten yards out from Bishop’s position clean through Shamrock centre, and over Wall and Tansey, centering a timely pass out from the corner to Crockett for the second Halifax goal, was a bright scintillating dash in the Crescent hockey display. Bishop in the goals is decidedly good”
“Farrell was the bright particular star last night. His skating, stick work and judgment in the position on the right boards has seldom been qualled. Trihey’s stick dexterity was again a revelation”
Another Montreal paper reported: “Maher is the effective man of the Crescents, but he had but little opportunity to show to any advantage last night, though the one opportunity that was given him was attended to in good order. Scanlan was able to take care of Maher, and did it, too. McInnes on the other wing is a husky individual, but he was no match for Arthur Farrell. The two centre men did better work, as they had more room to play in, but their style of game had little effect against Trihey’s brilliant stick handling and Brannen’s swift dashes. Brannen was a surprise to the Halifax men, and his method of getting over the ice was an eye opener to the visitors”
Final Score: 10-2 Shamrocks
Rosters
Crescents: Bishop in goal, Kane at point, Mullane at cover, Crockett, Ryan, Maher, and McInnes at forward
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Tansey at point, Wall at cover, Trihey, Farrell, Scanlan, and Brannen at forward
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Farrell | Tansey or McKenna |
| Shamrocks | Farrell | Brannen or Trihey | Maybe Trihey |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Trihey | Maybe Trihey | N/A |
| Crescents | Maher | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Brannen or Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey or Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Crescents | Crockett | Mullane | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Wall | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Wall or Tansey | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Wall | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Wall or Brannen | N/A | N/A |
Sources: The Gazette, 6 March 1900 page 2, and The Montreal Star, 6 March 1900 page 19
Halifax Crescents vs Montreal Shamrocks, 7 March 1900
This is pretty amazing- I looked at two sources- both from Montreal - and neither can agree on the goalscorer for a single goal.
A Montreal paper wrote: “Bishop’s goal work was a feature. Farrell again proved Shamrock’s strong number, with Trihey, Brannen and Tansey in close order”
Another Montreal paper reported: “There are many weaknesses on the Crescent team, and one of them is their failure to shoot. Time after time they brought the puck into favorable positions, but they appeared to lack confidence in their abilities and passed the puck to the wing to give Mahar a chance, but Scanlan was altogether too much for the young man, and a pass to Mahar generally landed at Scanlan’s stick”
“During the whole period of the match McKenna never touched the puck while it was in play”
“Arthur Farrell appeared at his best and his backhand pass and side carom were altogether too much for McInnes, who was at a standstill whenever Farrell began to move. Brannen’s flight was almost meteoric and he could almost beat out a lift to the other goal. Scanlan made a runaway race of it with Mahar, though the latter showed up to better advantage than any one on the Crescent forward line, Scanlan could bring the puck to the goal every time, but to save his life he could not score”
“The only man on the Crescent team who really showed up to our standard last night was Bishop, the goal tend. He played a magnificent game and his work in the second half was almost marvelous”
Final Score: 11-0 Shamrocks
Rosters
Crescents: Bishop in goal, Kane at point, Mullane at cover, Crockett, Ryan, Maher, and McInnes at forward
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Tansey at point, Wall at cover, Farrell, Scanlan, Trihey, and Brannen at forward
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Shamrocks | Trihey or Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Wall | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey or Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Brannen or Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Scanlan or Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Wall or Farrell | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Brannen or Wall | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Trihey or Farrell | N/A | N/A |
Sources: The Gazette, 8 March 1900 page 2, and The Montreal Star, 8 March 1900 page 19
Series Scoring Table:
| Name | Team | Goals | Assists | Points |
| Farrell | Shamrocks | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Crockett | Halifax | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Maher | Halifax | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Trihey | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Wall | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mullane | Halifax | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| | | | |
| Maybe Trihey | Shamrocks | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| | | | |
| Farrell or Trihey | Shamrocks | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Farrell or Wall | Shamrocks | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Brannen or Wall | Shamrocks | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Brannen or Trihey | Shamrocks | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Brannen or Farrell | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Scanlan or Trihey | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Tansey or Wall | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| McKenna or Tansey | Shamrocks | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Winnipeg Victorias vs Montreal Shamrocks, 29 January 1901
A Winnipeg paper reported: “The Victorias were first to appear, and were greeted with great applause, the audience recognizing Bain, Gingras, Johnstone and Rod Flett at once, while a great deal of interest was awakened by the beautiful skating of Wood, who as a young player, caused considerable conjecture and speculation. ‘Whitey’ Merritt was missed, and his successor, Brown, came in for a large amount of close scrutiny, which he fully warrants, for his work was beautiful. Magnus Flett, too, came in for his share of interest”
“Bain was hounded by two men without stop and so closely checked that he could not shoot. He passed frequently to Wood or GIngras and they sent in dozens of hot shots on McKenna, who certainly played a star game”
“Johnstone scored one. He’ll do better than that yet. He is only getting warmed up”
“The Winnipeg defence is breaking up the Shamrocks’ combination work. More power to them”
“Bain and Burke Wood are doing the trick of scoring between them. They are a hard team to beat”
“Gingras generally seems to score when the most need is. As a benedict he is not a whit less great”
“Brown felt bad about that high lift. Not at all, Art. It was not your fault; no one but an owl could see it among the rafters”
A Montreal paper wrote: “Wood was a hard man to figure on, and nobody knew exactly what Gingras was going to do, so that the Shamrock defence were kept very busy, indeed. Wall and Grant were both trying the lifting game, but the visitors gauged the drops well”
“Incidentally, Bain is a peach”
“Wall made one of his dangerous lifts which should have scored”
Final Score: 4-3 Winnipeg
Rosters
Winnipeg: Brown in goal, R. Flett at point, M. Flett at cover, Johnson, Bain, Gingras, and Wood at forward
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Wall at point, Grant at cover, Scanlan, Brannen, Trihey, and Farrell at forward
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Trihey | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Johnstone or Bain or Gingras | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Bain or Gingras | Maybe Gingras | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Wood or Johnstone | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Farrell or Brannen | N/A | N/A |
| Shamrocks | Wall | N/A | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Wood | Gingras | N/A |
Sources: The Winnipeg Tribune, 30 January 1901 page 2 and 5, The Gazette, 30 January 1901 page 2, and The Montreal Star, 30 January 1901 page 2
Winnipeg Victorias vs Montreal Shamrocks, 31 January 1901
A Winnipeg paper reported: “Bain scored both goals last night and is probably the greatest player the world ever saw, but Gingras, Johnstone, Wood and the others also played mighty games. The defence was equally as strong. The Flett Brothers’ combination was a happy hit of Armytage, and worked ot perfection. By all reports Rod put up the greatest point game in a superlatively great career while Brown, in goal, well deserves the name ‘wizard’.
“Bain scored both goals and played from the first like a man whose very soul was at stake for he possibly knew it was ‘now or never’. His pluck, speed and endurance were magnificent for he was watched a pounded in a special manner”
“On the left Burke Wood played against Farrell and not only ‘held him down’ but occasionally took a turn in centre ice. Farrell put up the game of his life but couldn’t score, which is saying a whole lot for Wood”
“On the right Gingras played Scanlan, and here was a battle royal. Gingras rushed his man and got in dozens of hot shots on McKenna, who put up a brilliant game throughout and saved a big score. Gingras as usual wa a hot favorite with the audience owing to his desperate spirits”
“In centre ice were Johnstone, Bain, Trihey and Brennan- and where will you ind another such a quartette? Johnstone is a veritable western cycling and whirls all over the ice coming at the puck and the man who has it from all directions, like a regular old-time norwester. He plays the position of ‘rover’ much more effectively than he ever did that of cover-[point. He is an ideal rover and never tires using either his body or his stick. He plays as if it was the greatest fun in the world after he got well warmed up. He is a steam engine at breaking up a combination. As for the Winnipeg defence, it was magical. Brown is the equal of anything ever seen here. The two Fletts work well together. Magnus takes care of the men and Rod handles the puck. They checked the ‘Green’ men so closely that it was impossible to score. They never lifted very far or made any of those startling shots on goal which used to distinguish Charlie Johnstone at cover and which Wall and Grant still practice. The day for long lifting seems to be over. It does no good and simply wearies the team for nothing”
“Brennan, Trihey and Farrell put up their greatest game, but Scanlan seemed afraid of his weak ankle-bone. On the defence Mike Grant was strong. He is far ahead of Tansey of last year, though not so pretty a player. Wall saved his goal scores of times and McKenna simply out-did himself”
“Trihey played like a demon and retrieved his fame until he was laid out in a hard body check from Mag. Flett. He went down and off the ice with a very sore wrist. Wood, who played brilliantly and seemed fresh, was laid off for the rest of the time the game went on”
“Carruthers at key says Bain, Gingras and Johnstone played the game of their lives. Bain was very roughly handled in the second part. Never could move unless he was heavily bodychecked. Brown saved the game for the Winnipegs”
“Flett brothers played a great game together”
A Montreal paper wrote: “The Shamrocks were weak in the defence, insofar as both Wall and Grant seemed to be duplicates in their own particular defence play. A little more dangerous man than Wall with his lifting ability would be difficult to find on hockey ice today. Grant is likewise a goodlifter, i no quite so accurate as Wall, with the added advantage of being able to rush well and use the body to good effect. But when Grant rushes and gets to the other side of the rink he does not get back in time enough to play his position, and stop the dash of a man like Gingras or Bain or Wood”
“ALthough McKenna made some sensational stops the men in front of him did not seem to have the necessary confidence, the result of which was that point and cover seemed to use up each other’s ground, and therefore lost ground”
“The work of Johnson and Gingras for the visitors was particularly worthy of note”
“What looked to be a fine run of Grant’s which nearly resulted in a score ended unexpectedly. He did not get back to place in time and Gingras came along like a ghost, and had the puck with him. He scored the game, the match was over, and Winnipeg had captured the Stanley Cup”
Final Score: 2-1 Victorias
Rosters
Winnipeg: Brown in goal, R. Flett at point, M. Flett at cover, Johnstone at rover, Bain at center, Wood at LW, Gingras at RW
Shamrocks: McKenna in goal, Grant at point, Wall at cover, Trihey at rover, Brennan at center, Scanlan at LW, and Farrell at RW
| Team | Goal Scorer | Assist | Assist |
| Winnipeg | Bain or Gingras | Maybe Gingras
Maybe Bain | Johnstone |
| Shamrocks | Trihey | Scanlan or Brannen | N/A |
| Winnipeg | Bain or Gingras | N/A | N/A |
Sources: The Winnipeg Tribune, 1 February 1901 page 5 and 7, The Gazette, 1 February 1901 page 2, and The Montreal Star, 1 February 1901 page 2
Series Scoring Table
| Name | Team | Goals | Assists | Points |
| Trihey | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Wall | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Wood | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gingras | Winnipeg | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Johnstone | Winnipeg | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| | | | |
| Maybe Gingras | Winnipeg | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Maybe Bain | Winnipeg | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| | | | |
| Bain or GIngras | Winnipeg | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Bain, Gingras, or Johnstone | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Brannen or Farrell | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Farrell or Trihey | Shamrocks | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Johnstone or Wood | Winnipeg | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Brannen or Scanlan | Shamrocks | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Total Shamrocks SC Challenge Stats 1899-1901
| Name | Goals | Assists | Points |
| Trihey | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Farrell | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| Scanlan | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Wall | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Brannen | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| | | |
| Maybe Trihey | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| | | |
| Farrell or Trihey | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Farrell or Wall | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Brannen or Trihey | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Brannen or Farrell | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Brannen or Wall | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Brannen or Farrell or Scanlan | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Scanlan or Trihey | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Tansey or Wall | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Brannen or Scanlan | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| McKenna or Tansey | 0 | 1 | 1 |
