Top 5 best GMs currently

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,709
10,208
BC
Anyone who has GMDA in their top 5 should have GMBA in there instead. Has clearly shown that he's a major reason for the blues success and has done an excellent job with Arizona/Utah.
He was AGM for 2 seasons and the Blues drafting hasn't missed a beat since he's been gone.

Was he part of the success? Sure. Does he get the credit over D. Armstrong? Not even close.
 

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
3,836
5,642
No joke, I think getting Askarov puts Mike Grier in contention at the moment. Maybe not top 5, admittedly. But somewhere close.

Zito should be #1.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Laus723

Nogatco Rd

Pierre-Luc Dubas
Apr 3, 2021
2,828
5,287
Maybe just in general, we have an overly romanticized picture that being a GM is only making trades, signing players, and drafting prospects.
I remember reading an anecdote where some writer was interviewing the Washington Wizards GM and they were interrupted when his secretary showed up with some paperwork that needed his signature. The writer asked what the papers were for and the GM said it was something like authorization to pay for sports bras for the WNBA team.
Not sure if Ernie Grunfeld is the GM you're referencing, but I think he was at one point the longest tenured GM in the NBA, and that certainly wasn't for his drafting or personnel acumen.

Ted Leonsis owns the Wizards and the Caps, and is notorious in the DMV area for only really caring about the Caps being successful. He always seemed satisfied with the Wiz being a middling organization, who drew well enough to help pay the bills at his arena.
 

Hins77

Registered User
Apr 2, 2013
4,054
3,714
I would say, this is not because a team is at the bottom of the standings, than this is easier for a GM. I mean Ottawa and Buffalo? Im still waiting. At one point, a GM need to build something. Ottawa getting chychrun, sanderson, chabot? For me this is 3 same kind of defensemen. Why?
Buffalo have a lot of tiny forward, why?
Montreal started their rebuild way after theirs and I consider them very close.
And good GM knows when make trades, bet when the values is at the highest (or lowest). the timming, the bluffing part.
Also, I don’t think it’s because your team make playoff, that your team has a good GM. I hated Marc Bergevin even if we were making playoff. He was not able to build a team, he was keeping 1st round pick when Price was the best goalie in the league, he was litterally a passive GM. I could continue the list. Anyway, a good GM to me is a good poker face, he knows when to buy, when to sell etc.
Don Waddell was a good GM in carolina. Losing many players (faulk, hamilton, trochek, niedereitter, etc. And still being competitive. Good GM takes best choice possible even tough one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

bringbacktheskate604

Registered User
Jul 20, 2022
1,472
1,664
Zito, McCrimmon, Nill, Sweeney, Hughes
Sorry but Hughes belongs nowhere on that list, Allvin should tho.

Drafting and accumulatig picks is easy,every GM does it and it means absolutely nothing until all that work culminates into a winning team.

I mean all those lottery picks and trades of stalled former high picks might look good one day but as of right now every single pick from Slaf to Caufield and everything in between has yet to do anything of significance, Dach has been nothing but glass, Dvorak was a flop and Newhook was meh in his first season.

Personally missing out on Cooley and Matvei was a huge blunder and Reinbacher imo should have been the 3rd dman off the board after Willander and the guy the yotes picked.

Meanwhile in less time Allvin has catapulted Vancouver up the standings, completely rebuilt the culture, went from the team with one of the worse cap structures to arguably one of the teams with the most efficient cap structure in the league. Doing all of this while going from the worst prospect pool to an average one while improving the team and lowering the average age of the club.
Him, Zito and Nill right now are the top 3 imo
 

Sasha Orlov

Lord of the Manor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2018
8,953
21,189
Sorry but Hughes belongs nowhere on that list, Allvin should tho.

Drafting and accumulatig picks is easy,every GM does it and it means absolutely nothing until all that work culminates into a winning team.

I mean all those lottery picks and trades of stalled former high picks might look good one day but as of right now every single pick from Slaf to Caufield and everything in between has yet to do anything of significance, Dach has been nothing but glass, Dvorak was a flop and Newhook was meh in his first season.

Personally missing out on Cooley and Matvei was a huge blunder and Reinbacher imo should have been the 3rd dman off the board after Willander and the guy the yotes picked.

Meanwhile in less time Allvin has catapulted Vancouver up the standings, completely rebuilt the culture, went from the team with one of the worse cap structures to arguably one of the teams with the most efficient cap structure in the league. Doing all of this while going from the worst prospect pool to an average one while improving the team and lowering the average age of the club.
Him, Zito and Nill right now are the top 3 imo
“means absolutely nothing until all that work culminates into a winning team.”

Remind me what Vancouver has won again (you can go back 100 years if you want)
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,765
4,093
Calgary
Not sure if Craig Conroy exactly fits a best GM description but he's doing a fine job of dismantling the mediocre Flames and trading older assets for younger players, prospects, and picks. At best, he should garner some praise for his ability to talk ownership into letting him do it because if there ever was an ownership group more adverse to going ahead with a serious rebuild I'd be interested in knowing who they are.

He needs to complete the rebuild before he comes anywhere close to top 5. This was the easy part but he has shown great patience.

The focus on keying on depth prospects/RFAs on other teams that he thinks are undervalued is very much a sink or swim strategy. If he hits on more than he misses on those guys he's going to look like a genius. Bahl, Sharangovich, Miromanov, the long name guy from Vancouver.

Not sure if that would be him or our scouting staff but either way, if he can pull that off it's huge.
 

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,392
11,902
Sorry but Hughes belongs nowhere on that list, Allvin should tho.

Drafting and accumulatig picks is easy,every GM does it and it means absolutely nothing until all that work culminates into a winning team.

I mean all those lottery picks and trades of stalled former high picks might look good one day but as of right now every single pick from Slaf to Caufield and everything in between has yet to do anything of significance, Dach has been nothing but glass, Dvorak was a flop and Newhook was meh in his first season.

Personally missing out on Cooley and Matvei was a huge blunder and Reinbacher imo should have been the 3rd dman off the board after Willander and the guy the yotes picked.

Meanwhile in less time Allvin has catapulted Vancouver up the standings, completely rebuilt the culture, went from the team with one of the worse cap structures to arguably one of the teams with the most efficient cap structure in the league. Doing all of this while going from the worst prospect pool to an average one while improving the team and lowering the average age of the club.
Him, Zito and Nill right now are the top 3 imo
Dvorak was a BargainBin blunder.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dutronc and viceroy

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,049
18,583
Mulberry Street
Zito, BriseBois, Nill, Trotz, McCrimmon, Francis

Really? Seattle had a good run last year but Francis hasn't been very good overall.

Allvin has basically just found ex Pens staff and players to sign which feels more like JR pulling strings. I don't put him in that group at all yet.

Zito, Nill, Armstrong (Blues), the last two are a toss up between 3-5 others I think. Hughes would be one but that pick of a pos that shouldn't have a career stops me from ever picking him as a top 5.

Sure hes overseeing a rebuild, but IMO Hughes shouldn't be in the top 5. You can collect as many picks or prospects as you want, but if none of them work out then it's really not that impressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bluenotes27

Xirik

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
9,870
14,654
Alberta
A Habs poster already cleared it up. Bergevin drafted the little pos. Hughes should have cut him loose though.
eyebrow-raise-okay.gif


Some would take offense to that.;)
 

CTHabsfan

Registered User
Jul 28, 2007
1,426
1,175
Sorry but Hughes belongs nowhere on that list, Allvin should tho.

Drafting and accumulatig picks is easy,every GM does it and it means absolutely nothing until all that work culminates into a winning team.

I mean all those lottery picks and trades of stalled former high picks might look good one day but as of right now every single pick from Slaf to Caufield and everything in between has yet to do anything of significance, Dach has been nothing but glass, Dvorak was a flop and Newhook was meh in his first season.

Personally missing out on Cooley and Matvei was a huge blunder and Reinbacher imo should have been the 3rd dman off the board after Willander and the guy the yotes picked.

Meanwhile in less time Allvin has catapulted Vancouver up the standings, completely rebuilt the culture, went from the team with one of the worse cap structures to arguably one of the teams with the most efficient cap structure in the league. Doing all of this while going from the worst prospect pool to an average one while improving the team and lowering the average age of the club.
Him, Zito and Nill right now are the top 3 imo
Valid point about trades and draft picks meaning nothing until you win, which is why Kent Hughes shouldn't be listed as a top-five GM at this time. Too bad you then state missing out on Cooley and Matvei (or at least not drafting Simashev or Wilander) was a huge blunder when Cooley outscored by Slafkovsky and none of the four mentioned 2023 draftees has played a single NHL game. If it's too soon to say Kent Hughes is a great GM, isn't also too soon to say he made huge mistakes with his 2022 and 2023 first-round picks?

Oh, I see that someone has already corrected you about Christian Dvorak, but it should also be noted Cole Caufield was not a Hughes pick. Caufield did play a lot better once Marc Bergevin's coach was fired and replaced by a Kent Hughes/Jeff Gorton hire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,669
17,100
Victoria
Any GM of a rebuilding team should pretty much be disqualified. It's easy to tear down a team. That's the easy part of the competitive cycle. Until teams like MTL, SJ, etc. actually make the playoffs, they haven't really accomplished anything.

Also LOL to Chevy. They need to win a round this decade before he's upgraded from mediocre.

Number 1 is Zito with a bullet. After that I would probably go some combo of Nill, Brisebois, Sakic/MacFarland, McCrimmon, and Allvin.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad