Because no one knows what damn position he's playing.WILDTATE10 said:How come Brent Burns isnt on anyones list?
Evilo said:Incredible how Whitney is still underrated after his stellar play for both the WB Pens and Pitt Pens.
clay said:1) Dion Phaneuf
2) Cam Barker
3) Ryan Suter
4) Jack Johnson
5) Niklas Kronwall
6) Fedor Tyutin
7) Braydon Coburn
8) Brent Seabrook
9) Andrej Meszaros
10) Anton Babchuk
11) Shawn Belle
12) Shea Weber
13) Ryan Whitney
14) Luc Bourdon
15) Carlo Coliaccavo
Good lord, you're really out of control when it comes to the Pens.jmelm said:And people need to realize Whitney is not merely an offensive defenseman. This guy will win a Norris one day.
rydlar said:According to HF:
1. Phaneuf
2. Suter
3. Barker
4. Coburn
5. Johnson
6. Tyutin
7. Kronwall
8. Babchuk
9. Seabrook
10. Meszaros
11. Weber
12. Belle
Any guesses on 13-15? That's as far as one can pull off their Top 50 list. I'd throw Matt Greene in there (7.0B - same as Belle) for the Oilers as potentially being in 13-15.
Also Ryan Whitney (don't know how he wasn't in there).
MrMastodonFarm said:Good lord, you're really out of control when it comes to the Pens.
For all the hype Dion Phaneuf has garnered over the past two years, and for all the hype he is getting now for how well he is playing I still haven't said he will ever win a Norris, those things are just way to hard to predict.
jmelm said:Looking at it from a Calder-eligable point of view, Whitney is 2nd after Phaneuf.
And people need to realize Whitney is not merely an offensive defenseman. This guy will win a Norris one day.
RallyKiller said:I'll take Smid, Grebeshkov, Bourdon and Whitney over Belle
Why, because half his points came in one game? Unreal.jmelm said:Looking at it from a Calder-eligable point of view, Whitney is 2nd after Phaneuf.
.
I don't think i'd easily take him number two after Dion but i agree he's looked real good for the Sens this year every game i've watched him play.He brings a nice game that kid.NCSENSFAN said:Sorry guys but the only person that I would take over Andrej Meszaros would be Phaneuf. Meszaros is a stud playing right now. when the A-train went down for two games this kid steped in and got top 4 mins, and they are using him on the PP. You can call me a Sens homer all you want but this kid is the real deal and only 19/20.
Belle doesn't get enough credit around here. He's a big and strong defenceman, and an absolutely wonderous skater. He's likely the fastest skating blue-line prospect. He showed at the WJC just how good he can be when he's playing smart. (He should have been a tourney all-star, IMO). I think Belle could be a top-pairing defenceman.Jon Prescription said:I'd take a BUNCH of people over Belle, also.
Staal, Whitney, etc etc.
Shawn Belle - Iowa Stars AHL - 11gp, 0g, 0a, 0ptsGod Bless Canada said:Belle doesn't get enough credit around here. He's a big and strong defenceman, and an absolutely wonderous skater. He's likely the fastest skating blue-line prospect. He showed at the WJC just how good he can be when he's playing smart. (He should have been a tourney all-star, IMO). I think Belle could be a top-pairing defenceman.
God Bless Canada said:Belle doesn't get enough credit around here. He's a big and strong defenceman, and an absolutely wonderous skater. He's likely the fastest skating blue-line prospect. He showed at the WJC just how good he can be when he's playing smart. (He should have been a tourney all-star, IMO). I think Belle could be a top-pairing defenceman.
God Bless Canada said:Belle doesn't get enough credit around here. He's a big and strong defenceman, and an absolutely wonderous skater. He's likely the fastest skating blue-line prospect. He showed at the WJC just how good he can be when he's playing smart. (He should have been a tourney all-star, IMO). I think Belle could be a top-pairing defenceman.
Rabid Ranger said:Doubt it. He's a poor man's Bret Hedican. He can skate like the wind and has nice size but has a two-cent brain and virtually zero offensive upside.