Canadiens1958
Registered User
You referring to the controversy over Art Ross's deployment of "Kitty Bar the Door" tactics C58?
Ross was not the only one. Variations -"lob","dump and chase", etc.
First pass or transition came much later.
You referring to the controversy over Art Ross's deployment of "Kitty Bar the Door" tactics C58?
Ross was not the only one. Variations -"lob","dump and chase", etc.
First pass or transition came much later.
,Yeah. Interesting find in the archives. Leo Dandurand, Flying Frenchman singularly unimpressed.
,
Yes, except they would lob or dump and chase at times, using the speed of Morenz, Joliat, Lepine.
Initial late 1930's Icing Rule was modified in 1945 to reflect the modern rule:
The Montreal Gazette - Google News Archive Search
Article also states that only one assist was to be awarded per goal. Yet we can plainly see that all six teams finished with more assists than goals in the 1945-46 season. Evidently the rule was either promptly rescinded or ignored altogether.
Next meeting most likely. Was more interested in the "Icing Rule" change.
Thru the O6 era at least, in season rule modifications were common.
Would love to see the minutes of the various NHL meeting.
Initial late 1930's Icing Rule was modified in 1945 to reflect the modern rule:
The Montreal Gazette - Google News Archive Search
Wouldn't that be something. Highly doubt they will ever release those archives though. Best to keep the fans merely suspecting that things aren't always on the level than to release the transcripts and remove all doubt.
What?!.... The red line running from the goalposts used to be the same line as the top of the crease? 15' out from the boards until 1945? So basically running along the same line as the top of the old rectangular crease?... That is/was insane.... And Art Ross. Gets shot down in wanting to remove the Center Ice Red, so then suggests "lets get rid of the Blue-Lines then. Vote please". Genius or Moron? No wonder Conn Smythe was forever losing his **** with the guy... didnt speak to him for some 15 years.
D’arcy Jenish quotes from some league meeting minutes in The NHL: A Centennial History, but I get the strong sense that verbatim meeting transcripts simply do not exist and the most we could ever hope to lay eyes on would amount to “Moved, Seconded, Discussion, Carried.”Next meeting most likely. Was more interested in the "Icing Rule" change.
Thru the O6 era at least, in season rule modifications were common.
Would love to see the minutes of the various NHL meeting.
What?!.... The red line running from the goalposts used to be the same line as the top of the crease? 15' out from the boards until 1945? So basically running along the same line as the top of the old rectangular crease?... That is/was insane.... And Art Ross. Gets shot down in wanting to remove the Center Ice Red, so then suggests "lets get rid of the Blue-Lines then. Vote please". Genius or Moron? No wonder Conn Smythe was forever losing his **** with the guy... didnt speak to him for some 15 years.
D’arcy Jenish quotes from some league meeting minutes in The NHL: A Centennial History, but I get the strong sense that verbatim meeting transcripts simply do not exist and the most we could ever hope to lay eyes on would amount to “Moved, Seconded, Discussion, Carried.”
If true, that’s beyond bizarre — I can’t even think of an intensifier strong enough. I’m floored.
If you’re really going on a Holmesian mission, start with that anti-betting regulation — “no player, club owner, executive, official, trainer, stick boy, or anyone connected with a team or the league can bet on a game. This goes even though his own team may not be playing in a game.” If I read the entire article correctly, this would seem to apply to both the NHL and CAHA?I have no reason to doubt the veracity, integrity of the reporter.... So ya, once again, truth far stranger than any fiction you or I, that anyone really could dream up.... Absolutely bizarre Badger. Art Ross... certifiable.... As for that Red Line running through the top of the crease, possibly beyond (?!)... new one on me. Makes zero sense. Beyond bizarre. Have serious doubts. Film, photos obviously exist. Pre-1945. Gonna do a little detective work.
If you’re really going on a Holmesian mission, start with that anti-betting regulation — “no player, club owner, executive, official, trainer, stick boy, or anyone connected with a team or the league can bet on a game. This goes even though his own team may not be playing in a game.” If I read the entire article correctly, this would seem to apply to both the NHL and CAHA?
Is there such a thing? In "absolute terms" Ovechkin would obliterate Hull. Even with the old equipment, the best players are faster, stronger, smarter, etc. than the best players 50 years ago (in a "time machine" scenario).I think all this is saying is all that IE is saying, which is we should focus on how good a player is in absolute terms,
Totally different interpretation of the phrase "in absolute terms"Is there such a thing? In "absolute terms" Ovechkin would obliterate Hull. Even with the old equipment, the best players are faster, stronger, smarter, etc. than the best players 50 years ago (in a "time machine" scenario).
If it helps, I'm pretty sure Yzerman is going to get that same benefit.Didn't Red Kelly get a bit too much mileague out of his Toronto years? His first half of his career was excellent but the second half...yeah, he was a good/very good #2C.
The biggest "plus" for Kelly in my books was the great quote presented that Imlach acquired him and moved him to center because he needed somebody to go up against Jean Beliveau. The results of that experiment speak for themselves. Toronto supplanted Montreal as the dominant team of the 1960s up until Kelly's retirement.
If it helps, I'm pretty sure Yzerman is going to get that same benefit.
But even aside from that - Kelly was an absolutely stud Dman who wouldn't have been out of place on the list at that time *as a Dman*. Toronto years gave some intangible points, but I thought of them as a tiebreaker because the tangibles were already there.
The biggest "plus" for Kelly in my books was the great quote presented that Imlach acquired him and moved him to center because he needed somebody to go up against Jean Beliveau. The results of that experiment speak for themselves. Toronto supplanted Montreal as the dominant team of the 1960s up until Kelly's retirement.